Spam detection software, running on the system "lists.denx.de", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: Hi Philipp, å¨ 2017/10/6 18:17, Philipp Tomsich åé: >> +   if (pdata->clk_in) { >> +       /* >> +        * Since mac_clk is fed by an external clock >> +        * we can use 0 here.
+Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â */ >> +Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ret = clk_set_rate(&clk, 0); > >
In hindsight using '0' was a bad decision. > We should always request the expected external clock rate here (so the > clock driver could do some sanity checking). [...]
Content analysis details: (6.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [211.157.147.133 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 0.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [58.22.7.114 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?58.22.7.114] 2.4 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 RBL: Very bad reputation (-5) [211.157.147.133 listed in bl.mailspike.net] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL Mailspike blacklisted