July 2008 - U-Boot

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix dm9000 receive status and len little endian issue
by Tsi-Chung Liew 02 Jul '08

02 Jul '08

From: TsiChung Liew <Tsi-Chung.Liew(a)freescale.com> The received status and len was in little endian format and caused the ethernet unable to proceed further. Add __le16_to_cpu() in dm9000_rx_status_8/16/32bit(). Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <Tsi-Chung.Liew(a)freescale.com> --- drivers/net/dm9000x.c | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/dm9000x.c b/drivers/net/dm9000x.c index 844fb76..e7365fe 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dm9000x.c +++ b/drivers/net/dm9000x.c @@ -214,24 +214,28 @@ static void dm9000_rx_status_32bit(u16 *RxStatus, u16 *RxLen) DM9000_outb(DM9000_MRCMD, DM9000_IO); tmpdata = DM9000_inl(DM9000_DATA); - *RxStatus = tmpdata; - *RxLen = tmpdata >> 16; + *RxStatus = __le16_to_cpu(tmpdata); + *RxLen = __le16_to_cpu(tmpdata >> 16); } static void dm9000_rx_status_16bit(u16 *RxStatus, u16 *RxLen) { DM9000_outb(DM9000_MRCMD, DM9000_IO); - *RxStatus = DM9000_inw(DM9000_DATA); - *RxLen = DM9000_inw(DM9000_DATA); + *RxStatus = __le16_to_cpu(DM9000_inw(DM9000_DATA)); + *RxLen = __le16_to_cpu(DM9000_inw(DM9000_DATA)); } static void dm9000_rx_status_8bit(u16 *RxStatus, u16 *RxLen) { DM9000_outb(DM9000_MRCMD, DM9000_IO); - *RxStatus = DM9000_inb(DM9000_DATA) + (DM9000_inb(DM9000_DATA) << 8); - *RxLen = DM9000_inb(DM9000_DATA) + (DM9000_inb(DM9000_DATA) << 8); + *RxStatus = + __le16_to_cpu(DM9000_inb(DM9000_DATA) + + (DM9000_inb(DM9000_DATA) << 8)); + *RxLen = + __le16_to_cpu(DM9000_inb(DM9000_DATA) + + (DM9000_inb(DM9000_DATA) << 8)); } /* -- 1.5.4.1

3 5

[U-Boot-Users] Problem with the prompt
by navin karnam 02 Jul '08

02 Jul '08

Hi all, When u-boot is loaded on board following messages come on my board. U-Boot 1.3.3 (Jul 2 2008 - 10:34:34) DRAM: 256 MB ERROR: too many flash sectors Flash: 64 MB *** Warning - bad CRC, using default environment In: serial Out: serial Err: serial $ If I don't press any key, within 1 minute above things repeat on hyper terminal again. Actually till user doesn't press anything, above messages should not repeat on hyper terminal. Kindly note that 1) CONFIG_BOOTDELAY -1 And none of the below #defines are enabled CONFIG_BOOT_RETRY_TIME CONFIG_BOOT_RETRY_MIN CONFIG_AUTOBOOT_KEYED CONFIG_AUTOBOOT_PROMPT CONFIG_AUTOBOOT_DELAY_STR CONFIG_AUTOBOOT_STOP_STR CONFIG_AUTOBOOT_DELAY_STR2 CONFIG_AUTOBOOT_STOP_STR2 CONFIG_ZERO_BOOTDELAY_CHECK CONFIG_RESET_TO_RETRY -- Regards, Naveen

3 2

[U-Boot-Users] (no subject)
by 钟文辉 02 Jul '08

02 Jul '08

各位老总：您们好！诚祝：您们在2008年里；有鼠不尽的快乐！鼠不尽的收获！鼠不尽的钞票！　鼠不尽的幸福！鼠不尽的美满生活！愿：您们阖家欢乐！幸福安康！我公司可以长期提供：出口报关单，核销单，等等一系列手续；代理：出口报关，商检，境内外运输......等等；还可以代办：出口欧盟许可证，欧盟产地证；并且还有（广州国际贸易交易会）的摊位可以转让；价格特别优惠；有意者请来邮件或来电联系。谢谢合作！　电话：0755-81153047。　传真：0755-81172940。　手机：15817477278。　联系人：钟文辉。　电子邮箱:shanhu.dao@163.com 此致：敬礼！

1 0

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] nand: Make 'nand dump.oob' actually work
by Scott Wood 01 Jul '08

01 Jul '08

Jason McMullan wrote: > Currently, "nand dump.oob" is a no-op. > > This commit makes it functional. nand dump.oob is implemented in the testing branch of u-boot-nand-flash, which I hope to merge next window. -Scott

1 0

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] nand: Make 'nand dump.oob' actually work
by Jason McMullan 01 Jul '08

01 Jul '08

Currently, "nand dump.oob" is a no-op. This commit makes it functional. Signed-off-by: Jason McMullan <mcmullan(a)netapp.com> --- common/cmd_nand.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/cmd_nand.c b/common/cmd_nand.c index 37198d2..f85ef09 100644 --- a/common/cmd_nand.c +++ b/common/cmd_nand.c @@ -39,6 +39,33 @@ int find_dev_and_part(const char *id, struct mtd_device **dev, static int nand_dump_oob(nand_info_t *nand, ulong off) { + int i; + size_t read_bytes; + u_char *buf, *p; + + buf = malloc(nand->oobsize); + if (!buf) { + puts("No memory for oob buffer\n"); + return 1; + } + off &= ~(nand->oobblock - 1); + i = nand->read_oob(nand, off, nand->oobsize, &read_bytes, buf); + if (i < 0) { + printf("Error (%d) reading page %08x\n", i, off); + free(buf); + return 1; + } + printf("Page %08x OOB:\n", off); + i = nand->oobsize >> 3; + p = buf; + while (i--) { + printf( "\t%02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x\n", + p[0], p[1], p[2], p[3], p[4], p[5], p[6], p[7]); + p += 8; + } + free(buf); + + return 0; } -- 1.5.4.3

1 0

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fix 460EX/GT PCIe port initialization
by Stefan Roese 01 Jul '08

01 Jul '08

This patch fixes a bug where the 460EX/GT PCIe UTLSET1 register was configured incorrectly. Thanks to Olga Buchonina from AMCC for pointing this out. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr(a)denx.de> --- cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_pcie.c | 12 +++++------- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_pcie.c b/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_pcie.c index 503facc..d50a538 100644 --- a/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_pcie.c +++ b/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_pcie.c @@ -615,22 +615,20 @@ int __ppc4xx_init_pcie_port_hw(int port, int rootport) #if defined(CONFIG_460EX) || defined(CONFIG_460GT) int __ppc4xx_init_pcie_port_hw(int port, int rootport) { - u32 val = 1 << 24; + u32 val; u32 utlset1; - if (rootport) { + if (rootport) val = PTYPE_ROOT_PORT << 20; - utlset1 = 0x21222222; - } else { + else val = PTYPE_LEGACY_ENDPOINT << 20; - utlset1 = 0x20222222; - } if (port == 0) { val |= LNKW_X1 << 12; + utlset1 = 0x20000000; } else { val |= LNKW_X4 << 12; - utlset1 |= 0x00101101; + utlset1 = 0x20101101; } SDR_WRITE(SDRN_PESDR_DLPSET(port), val); -- 1.5.6.1

1 0

[U-Boot-Users] Relocating code problem
by Aruna Kumari 01 Jul '08

01 Jul '08

I have a problem durinf relocating of code from sdram. The uboot hangs. My sdram initialization is correct as it has passed ddr test. Kindly help me in solving this. I am using Jtag to download uboot to flash. Regards, Aruna, Project leader, DEEOPL, BAngalore

3 2

[U-Boot-Users] Using DDR1 in AMCC 460EX custom design
by Felix Radensky 01 Jul '08

01 Jul '08

Hi, I will soon have to port U-Boot to a custom board based on AMCC 460EX CPU. This board should be very close to Canyonlands evaluation board, but board designers decided to use DDR1 instead of DDR2 present on Canyonlands. Looking at U-Boot 1.3.3 code, I can see that DDR1 support for 460EX is available in cpu/ppc4xx/cp44x_spd_ddr2.c. My question is - was DDR1 support ever tested on 460EX. Another question is - are there DDR1 DIMMs that can be used on Canyonlands ? Thanks a lot. Felix.

3 4

[U-Boot-Users] (no subject)
by 钟文辉 01 Jul '08

01 Jul '08

各位老总：您们好！诚祝：您们在2008年里；有鼠不尽的快乐！鼠不尽的收获！鼠不尽的钞票！　鼠不尽的幸福！鼠不尽的美满生活！愿：您们阖家欢乐！幸福安康！我公司可以长期提供：出口报关单，核销单，等等一系列手续；代理：出口报关，商检，境内外运输......等等；还可以代办：出口欧盟许可证，欧盟产地证；并且还有（广州国际贸易交易会）的摊位可以转让；价格特别优惠；有意者请来邮件或来电联系。谢谢合作！　电话：0755-81153047。　传真：0755-81172940。　手机：15817477278。　联系人：钟文辉。　电子邮箱:shanhu.dao@163.com 此致：敬礼！

1 0