Tom, do you have time for Tegra stuff still? Thanks!

Yeah, I do. It just got pushed to the back of the line the last few weeks, but that surge should be over and I can get back to my usual round-robin scheduling of my task list.

Thanks,

Tom

-----Original Message----- From: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 3:44 PM To: Marcel Ziswiler marcel@ziswiler.com; Tom Warren TWarren@nvidia.com Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Marcel Ziswiler marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com Subject: Re: Tegra U-Boot Patches

* PGP Signed by an unknown key

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:40:45AM +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:

Hi Tom

I have 3 patch sets [1, 2, 3] more or less long since (e.g. the longest almost one full year now) awaiting inclusion. Could you please consider pulling those in during current merge window?

Good news two more patches [4, 5] long since got applied and may be removed (resp. status changes) in patchwork.

Thanks for the update on [4, 5], I was wondering about those when cleaning up patchwork earlier today.

Tom, do you have time for Tegra stuff still? Thanks!

-- Tom

* Unknown Key * 0xD31D7652 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Tom

On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 23:08 +0000, Tom Warren wrote:

Hi, Marcel. I had it on my TODO list to send you an email asking for a list of pending patches today! Sorry for the delay - things have heated up here and I don’t get to give my upstream tasks as much attention as I'd like.

No problem, just glad if you can make it.

I'll pull them down first thing tomorrow and get a PR up for TomR to apply. Are they in order as you have them listed here? i.e. I can apply #1, then #2, then #3?

Yes, that should work fine.

Or are there no dependencies?

#1 e.g. the tegra nand mtd stuff is independent. But #2 e.g. the TK1 stuff should go before #3 e.g. the T30 stuff due to the former introducing the weak tegra_pcie_board_port_reset() function the later also uses.

Thanks for your patience,

Thank you for your continued support!

Tom

Cheers

Marcel

-----Original Message----- From: Marcel Ziswiler marcel@ziswiler.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 3:41 PM To: Tom Warren TWarren@nvidia.com Cc: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Marcel Ziswiler marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com Subject: Tegra U-Boot Patches

Hi Tom

I have 3 patch sets [1, 2, 3] more or less long since (e.g. the longest almost one full year now) awaiting inclusion. Could you please consider pulling those in during current merge window?

Good news two more patches [4, 5] long since got applied and may be removed (resp. status changes) in patchwork.

[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=43045 [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=43210 [3] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=43290 [4] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/797890/ [5] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/797887/

Thanks!

Cheers

Marcel