Hi Grant, I don´t know if your approach is a better solution if your final intention is to clean up the code from the C files of U-Boot where the relocation is done manually. I think this would be the final goal, so, if the BROKEN or FIXED defines are provisional and only for test proposes I think both are equally valid.

Regards, Txema. -----Mensaje original----- De: u-boot-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:u-boot-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] En nombre de Grant Likely Enviado el: miércoles, 21 de febrero de 2007 18:01 Para: Stefan Roese CC: U-Boot-Users Asunto: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix relocation problem with "new"get_dev() function

At first glance this looks like a bad idea because it means every board config file must be touched; but every config file needs to be touched regardless. Either: a) touch every config file now (by adding the "IT'S BROKEN" define; or b) touch every config file later (by removing the "IT'S FIXED" define when all board ports are working and the hooks are no longer needed).

Thoughts? g.