[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] designware_i2c: Enhance DesignWare I2C driver address support

Enhance the DesignWare I2C driver to support address length more than 1 byte. This enhancement is required as some I2C slave device such as EEPROM chip might have 16 bit address byte.
Signed-off-by: Chin Liang See clsee@altera.com Cc: Alexey Brodkin Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com Cc: Tom Rini trini@ti.com cc: Armando Visconti armando.visconti@st.com Cc: Stefan Roese sr@denx.de Cc: Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.net Cc: Heiko Schocher hs@denx.de Cc: Vipin KUMAR vipin.kumar@st.com Cc: Mischa Jonker mjonker@synopsys.com --- Changes for v2 - Removed the function check_params() --- drivers/i2c/designware_i2c.c | 41 +++++++++-------------------------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/designware_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/designware_i2c.c index cb2ac04..5b8482a 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/designware_i2c.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/designware_i2c.c @@ -197,35 +197,18 @@ static int i2c_wait_for_bb(void) return 0; }
-/* check parameters for i2c_read and i2c_write */ -static int check_params(uint addr, int alen, uchar *buffer, int len) -{ - if (buffer == NULL) { - printf("Buffer is invalid\n"); - return 1; - } - - if (alen > 1) { - printf("addr len %d not supported\n", alen); - return 1; - } - - if (addr + len > 256) { - printf("address out of range\n"); - return 1; - } - - return 0; -} - -static int i2c_xfer_init(uchar chip, uint addr) +static int i2c_xfer_init(uchar chip, uint addr, int alen) { if (i2c_wait_for_bb()) return 1;
i2c_setaddress(chip); - writel(addr, &i2c_regs_p->ic_cmd_data); - + while (alen) { + alen--; + /* high byte address going out first */ + writel((addr >> (alen * 8)) & 0xff, + &i2c_regs_p->ic_cmd_data); + } return 0; }
@@ -266,10 +249,7 @@ int i2c_read(uchar chip, uint addr, int alen, uchar *buffer, int len) { unsigned long start_time_rx;
- if (check_params(addr, alen, buffer, len)) - return 1; - - if (i2c_xfer_init(chip, addr)) + if (i2c_xfer_init(chip, addr, alen)) return 1;
start_time_rx = get_timer(0); @@ -307,10 +287,7 @@ int i2c_write(uchar chip, uint addr, int alen, uchar *buffer, int len) int nb = len; unsigned long start_time_tx;
- if (check_params(addr, alen, buffer, len)) - return 1; - - if (i2c_xfer_init(chip, addr)) + if (i2c_xfer_init(chip, addr, alen)) return 1;
start_time_tx = get_timer(0);

On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 09:45 -0600, Chin Liang See wrote:
Changes for v2
- Removed the function check_params()
Ok, so you decided to not add "assert" check instead. I think it's ok - it's not a requirement. Others don't do it as well so let's leave it as it is.
Acked-by: Alexey Brodkin abrodkin@synopsys.com
Regards, Alexey

Thanks Alexey.
Hi Heiko,
I believe this patch should be good for apply. Would need your help then. :) Thanks
Chin Liang
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 15:51 +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 09:45 -0600, Chin Liang See wrote:
Changes for v2
- Removed the function check_params()
Ok, so you decided to not add "assert" check instead. I think it's ok - it's not a requirement. Others don't do it as well so let's leave it as it is.
Acked-by: Alexey Brodkin abrodkin@synopsys.com
Regards, Alexey

Hello Chin,
Am 22.01.2014 16:37, schrieb Chin Liang See:
Thanks Alexey.
Hi Heiko,
I believe this patch should be good for apply. Would need your help then. :) Thanks
Chin Liang
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 15:51 +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 09:45 -0600, Chin Liang See wrote:
Changes for v2
- Removed the function check_params()
Ok, so you decided to not add "assert" check instead. I think it's ok - it's not a requirement. Others don't do it as well so let's leave it as it is.
Acked-by: Alexey Brodkinabrodkin@synopsys.com
Regards, Alexey
Your patch apply not clean to current head f889cc81c1572f4af0be950fd49bb6b67bc580fb also checkpatch drops one warning:
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis #82: FILE: drivers/i2c/designware_i2c.c:210: + writel((addr >> (alen * 8)) & 0xff, + &i2c_regs_p->ic_cmd_data);
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 64 lines checked
Could you please fix this, thanks!
bye, Heiko

Hi Heiko,
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 06:20 +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Chin,
Am 22.01.2014 16:37, schrieb Chin Liang See:
Thanks Alexey.
Hi Heiko,
I believe this patch should be good for apply. Would need your help then. :) Thanks
Chin Liang
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 15:51 +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 09:45 -0600, Chin Liang See wrote:
Changes for v2
- Removed the function check_params()
Ok, so you decided to not add "assert" check instead. I think it's ok - it's not a requirement. Others don't do it as well so let's leave it as it is.
Acked-by: Alexey Brodkinabrodkin@synopsys.com
Regards, Alexey
Your patch apply not clean to current head f889cc81c1572f4af0be950fd49bb6b67bc580fb also checkpatch drops one warning:
Yup, it caused by a later patch. Let me re-base my patch.
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis #82: FILE: drivers/i2c/designware_i2c.c:210:
writel((addr >> (alen * 8)) & 0xff,
&i2c_regs_p->ic_cmd_data);
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 64 lines checked
I overlooked this as I saw no errors. Let me fix that too. Thanks again for your helps.
Chin Liang
Could you please fix this, thanks!
bye, Heiko
participants (3)
-
Alexey Brodkin
-
Chin Liang See
-
Heiko Schocher