[U-Boot] [PATCHv2][RESEND] spi: Add support for N25Q016A

Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer moritz.fischer@ettus.com --- drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c index 4f37e33..8ae4eea 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ const struct spi_flash_params spi_flash_params_table[] = { {"M25P64", 0x202017, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, RD_NORM, 0}, {"M25P128", 0x202018, 0x0, 256 * 1024, 64, RD_NORM, 0}, {"M25PX64", 0x207117, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, RD_NORM, SECT_4K}, + {"N25Q016A", 0x20bb15, 0x1000, 64 * 1024, 32, RD_NORM, SECT_4K}, {"N25Q32", 0x20ba16, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL, WR_QPP | SECT_4K}, {"N25Q32A", 0x20bb16, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL, WR_QPP | SECT_4K}, {"N25Q64", 0x20ba17, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, RD_FULL, WR_QPP | SECT_4K},

On 14 July 2016 at 00:00, Moritz Fischer moritz.fischer@ettus.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer moritz.fischer@ettus.com
drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c index 4f37e33..8ae4eea 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ const struct spi_flash_params spi_flash_params_table[] = { {"M25P64", 0x202017, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, RD_NORM, 0}, {"M25P128", 0x202018, 0x0, 256 * 1024, 64, RD_NORM, 0}, {"M25PX64", 0x207117, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, RD_NORM, SECT_4K},
{"N25Q016A", 0x20bb15, 0x1000, 64 * 1024, 32, RD_NORM, SECT_4K},
Why would we need this ext_id (0x1000) here? I understand this is true number for this part but it shouldn't require for probe or require somewhere else?
thanks!

Jagan,
thanks for your review!
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.teki@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 July 2016 at 00:00, Moritz Fischer moritz.fischer@ettus.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer moritz.fischer@ettus.com
drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c index 4f37e33..8ae4eea 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ const struct spi_flash_params spi_flash_params_table[] = { {"M25P64", 0x202017, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, RD_NORM, 0}, {"M25P128", 0x202018, 0x0, 256 * 1024, 64, RD_NORM, 0}, {"M25PX64", 0x207117, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, RD_NORM, SECT_4K},
{"N25Q016A", 0x20bb15, 0x1000, 64 * 1024, 32, RD_NORM, SECT_4K},
Why would we need this ext_id (0x1000) here? I understand this is true number for this part but it shouldn't require for probe or require somewhere else?
You're right. I just sent v3.
Cheers,
Moritz
participants (2)
-
Jagan Teki
-
Moritz Fischer