[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] iomux-v3: Take mx6dqp in consideration for imx_iomux_v3_setup_pad()

We should take the MX6DP and MX6QP options in consideration when defining imx_iomux_v3_setup_pad().
Based on a patch by Pierluigi Passaro pierluigi.p@variscite.com
Signed-off-by: Eran Matityahu eran.m@variscite.com --- arch/arm/include/asm/mach-imx/iomux-v3.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach-imx/iomux-v3.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach-imx/iomux-v3.h index ed75e9c..2008dc9 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach-imx/iomux-v3.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach-imx/iomux-v3.h @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ void imx_iomux_gpio_get_function(unsigned int gpio, #if defined(CONFIG_MX6QDL) #define IOMUX_PADS(x) (MX6Q_##x), (MX6DL_##x) #define SETUP_IOMUX_PAD(def) \ -if (is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6Q) || is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6D)) { \ +if (is_mx6dq() || is_mx6dqp()) { \ imx_iomux_v3_setup_pad(MX6Q_##def); \ } else { \ imx_iomux_v3_setup_pad(MX6DL_##def); \

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Eran Matityahu eran.m@variscite.com wrote:
We should take the MX6DP and MX6QP options in consideration when defining imx_iomux_v3_setup_pad().
Based on a patch by Pierluigi Passaro pierluigi.p@variscite.com
Signed-off-by: Eran Matityahu eran.m@variscite.com
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@nxp.com
participants (2)
-
Eran Matityahu
-
Fabio Estevam