The RSK7203 board has the SMSC9118 wired up 'incorrectly'. Byte-swapping is necessary, and so poor performance is inevitable. This problem cannot evade by the swap function of CHIP, this can evade by software Byte-swapping. And this has problem by FIFO access only. pkt_data_pull/pkt_data_push functions necessary to solve this problem.

Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwamatsu.nobuhiro@renesas.com --- drivers/net/smc911x.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/smc911x.c b/drivers/net/smc911x.c index 0fff820..648c94c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/smc911x.c +++ b/drivers/net/smc911x.c @@ -57,6 +57,11 @@ static inline void reg_write(u32 addr, u32 val) #error "SMC911X: undefined bus width" #endif /* CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC911X_16_BIT */

+u32 pkt_data_pull(u32 addr) \ + __attribute__ ((weak, alias ("reg_read"))); +void pkt_data_push(u32 addr, u32 val) \ + __attribute__ ((weak, alias ("reg_write"))); + #define mdelay(n) udelay((n)*1000)

/* Below are the register offsets and bit definitions @@ -641,7 +646,7 @@ int eth_send(volatile void *packet, int length) tmplen = (length + 3) / 4;

while (tmplen--) - reg_write(TX_DATA_FIFO, *data++); + pkt_data_push(TX_DATA_FIFO, *data++);

/* wait for transmission */ while (!((reg_read(TX_FIFO_INF) & TX_FIFO_INF_TSUSED) >> 16)); @@ -684,7 +689,7 @@ int eth_rx(void)

tmplen = (pktlen + 2+ 3) / 4; while (tmplen--) - *data++ = reg_read(RX_DATA_FIFO); + *data++ = pkt_data_pull(RX_DATA_FIFO);

if (status & RX_STS_ES) printf(DRIVERNAME