[PATCH] test: cmd: setexpr: Fix a typo

SETEXPR_TEST is for a new setexpr test, not mem.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com ---
test/cmd/setexpr.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/test/cmd/setexpr.c b/test/cmd/setexpr.c index fd6d869..7067e1f 100644 --- a/test/cmd/setexpr.c +++ b/test/cmd/setexpr.c @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
#define BUF_SIZE 0x100
-/* Declare a new mem test */ +/* Declare a new setexpr test */ #define SETEXPR_TEST(_name, _flags) UNIT_TEST(_name, _flags, setexpr_test)
/* Test 'setexpr' command with simply setting integers */

On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 02:04, Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
SETEXPR_TEST is for a new setexpr test, not mem.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com
test/cmd/setexpr.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Thanks...I have a local patch not yet sent.

On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 02:04, Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
SETEXPR_TEST is for a new setexpr test, not mem.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com
test/cmd/setexpr.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Thanks...I have a local patch not yet sent.
Applied to u-boot-dm/next, thanks!
participants (2)
-
Bin Meng
-
Simon Glass