[U-Boot-Users] [Patch 1/5] Add support for AT91SAM9261EK board

The five following patches adds support to build the AT91SAM9261EK board (USB, LCD, NandFlash and DataFlash support)
These patches are applied against the 1.1.4 release and should be applied in numerical order.
This patch (1/5) adds support for ATMEL AT91SAM9261EK board.
CHANGELOG Patch by Nicolas Lacressonniere 23 January 2006 * Add support for ATMEL AT91SAM9261EK board (arm926ejs)

Sorry,
I forgot to attach the file...
-----Original Message----- From: Lacressonniere Nicolas [mailto:nicolas.lacressonniere@rfo.atmel.com] Sent: lundi 23 janvier 2006 13:53 To: U-Boot-Users Cc: Lacressonniere Nicolas Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [Patch 1/5] Add support for AT91SAM9261EK board
The five following patches adds support to build the AT91SAM9261EK board (USB, LCD, NandFlash and DataFlash support)
These patches are applied against the 1.1.4 release and should be applied in numerical order.
This patch (1/5) adds support for ATMEL AT91SAM9261EK board.
CHANGELOG Patch by Nicolas Lacressonniere 23 January 2006 * Add support for ATMEL AT91SAM9261EK board (arm926ejs)

Hi Wolfgang,
This time, patches are applied against git top of tree and should be applied in numerical order.
The five following patches adds support to build the AT91SAM9261EK board (USB, LCD and DataFlash support)
This first patch (1/5) adds support for ATMEL AT91SAM9261EK board.
CHANGELOG Patch by Nicolas Lacressonniere 24 January 2006 * Add support for ATMEL AT91SAM9261EK board (arm926ejs)
Best regards. Nicolas.

Hi Wolfgang,
Following patches are applied against git top of tree and should be applied in numerical order.
The five following patches adds support to build the AT91SAM9261EK board (USB, LCD and DataFlash support)
This first patch (1/5) adds support for ATMEL AT91SAM9261EK board.
CHANGELOG Patch by Nicolas Lacressonniere 31 January 2006 * Add support for ATMEL AT91SAM9261EK board (arm926ejs)
Best regards. Nicolas.

I had to split my first patch, so please find attached AT91SAM9261.h header file
CHANGELOG Patch by Nicolas Lacressonniere 23 January 2006 * Add AT91SAM9261 header file for ATMEL AT91SAM9261EK board
-----Original Message----- From: u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Lacressonniere Nicolas Sent: lundi 23 janvier 2006 13:53 To: U-Boot-Users Cc: Lacressonniere Nicolas Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [Patch 1/5] Add support for AT91SAM9261EK board
The five following patches adds support to build the AT91SAM9261EK board (USB, LCD, NandFlash and DataFlash support)
These patches are applied against the 1.1.4 release and should be applied in numerical order.
This patch (1/5) adds support for ATMEL AT91SAM9261EK board.
CHANGELOG Patch by Nicolas Lacressonniere 23 January 2006 * Add support for ATMEL AT91SAM9261EK board (arm926ejs)
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&da... _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Please find attached AT91SAM9261.h header file (patch 2/5)
CHANGELOG Patch by Nicolas Lacressonniere 24 January 2006 * Add AT91SAM9261 header file for ATMEL AT91SAM9261EK board

In message KAEELLICOFHDAEPIACDEAEOECFAA.nicolas.lacressonniere@rfo.atmel.com you wrote:
These patches are applied against the 1.1.4 release and should be applied in numerical order.
Why don't you submit patches against top of tree?
This patch (1/5) adds support for ATMEL AT91SAM9261EK board.
Ummm... "this patch"? There is no patch anywhere...
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk

Hi Wolfgang,
Why don't you submit patches against top of tree?
I don't have access to CVS in my office. Moreover, my last submitted patches (mainly for at91rm9200dk) were submitted against the release and not against CVS, and you accepted them... That's why I did the same thing today...
But, as I have to try to find a solution to submit my nandflash patch against "testing-NAND" branch, I can try to submit other patches against top of tree at the same time, in this case, forget all patches I submitted today and I will re-submit them later. Is it OK for you?
Best regards. Nicolas.
-----Original Message----- From: wd@denx.de [mailto:wd@denx.de] Sent: lundi 23 janvier 2006 15:23 To: Lacressonniere Nicolas Cc: U-Boot-Users Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [Patch 1/5] Add support for AT91SAM9261EK board
In message KAEELLICOFHDAEPIACDEAEOECFAA.nicolas.lacressonniere@rfo.atmel.com you wrote:
These patches are applied against the 1.1.4 release and should be applied
in
numerical order.
Why don't you submit patches against top of tree?
This patch (1/5) adds support for ATMEL AT91SAM9261EK board.
Ummm... "this patch"? There is no patch anywhere...
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
-- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de Oh, that sound of male ego. You travel halfway across the galaxy and it's still the same song. -- Eve McHuron, "Mudd's Women", stardate 1330.1

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message KAEELLICOFHDAEPIACDEAEOECFAA.nicolas.lacressonniere@rfo.atmel.com you wrote:
These patches are applied against the 1.1.4 release and should be applied in numerical order.
Why don't you submit patches against top of tree?
We can't run cvs commands at work. We are behind a proxy and according to some standards imposed by an audit company (bla bla bla bla) we are not allowed to even get a watched tunnel. There is also no way to get a snapshot from sourceforge site without using cvs.
I am also asking myself, if there aren't many changes between 1.1.4 and top of tree, maybe you should consider these patches anyway.
We will see what we can do.
Regards,
Amine.
This patch (1/5) adds support for ATMEL AT91SAM9261EK board.
Ummm... "this patch"? There is no patch anywhere...
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk

In message 43D4EED4.9030508@rfo.atmel.com you wrote:
We can't run cvs commands at work. We are behind a proxy and according to some standards imposed by an audit company (bla bla bla bla) we are not allowed to even get a watched tunnel. There is also no way to get a snapshot from sourceforge site without using cvs.
Ummm... that argument is just void.
First, CVS is dead and only kept working for a limited time. Please use GIT instead. GIT inherently supports HTTP transfers so I guess you should be able to access the GIT repository just fine.
Second, the documentation clearly explains how to use the cvsgrab tool (see http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootVersions) to tunnel CVS through HTTP protocol; again, this should work fine even for you behind your restrictive firewall.
Third, you should be in a position to explain your network admins that their role is to enable you to get some work done, not to block you. They are servants of your company, not Gods.
I am also asking myself, if there aren't many changes between 1.1.4 and top of tree, maybe you should consider these patches anyway.
You will need to use GIT anyway to get access to the testing-NAND branch. Any patches against the current NAND code will just be lost when we merge that branch back into the trunk.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
participants (3)
-
Lacressonniere Nicolas
-
Mohammed Amine SAYA
-
Wolfgang Denk