[U-Boot] [STATUS] v2013.04-rc2 released
Hey all,
I've tagged and pushed v2013.04-rc2 now. We're getting closer to the expected release date, but I hope to meet the deadline still.
First, a word of warning. The syntax for 'ext4write' was changed to match the rest of the filesystem read/write commands. If you had scripts or other things using this, please change them.
Now, I know Albert is working on a pull request for u-boot-arm and in turn waiting on a few other changes to come in still.
Next, we haven't met the goal of having the TPM related codebase and usage sorted out, but that's not a failing on the side of the folks pushing the code, so we aren't going to rip that out. But I'm not going to pull the 45 part series in just before the release either.
If you have specific bugfixes, please hit me up and CC the list. Putting my u-boot-ti hat on, aside from the MMC1 bugfix I just posted, I Manfred Huber's TEMT fix.
Hi Tom,
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:33:03 -0400, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
Hey all,
I've tagged and pushed v2013.04-rc2 now. We're getting closer to the expected release date, but I hope to meet the deadline still.
First, a word of warning. The syntax for 'ext4write' was changed to match the rest of the filesystem read/write commands. If you had scripts or other things using this, please change them.
Now, I know Albert is working on a pull request for u-boot-arm and in turn waiting on a few other changes to come in still.
Next, we haven't met the goal of having the TPM related codebase and usage sorted out, but that's not a failing on the side of the folks pushing the code, so we aren't going to rip that out. But I'm not going to pull the 45 part series in just before the release either.
If you have specific bugfixes, please hit me up and CC the list. Putting my u-boot-ti hat on, aside from the MMC1 bugfix I just posted, I Manfred Huber's TEMT fix.
Mainly I am waiting for Vincent's V10 to be tested a bit, and also I am going to post the fix for the __bss_end mixup. Anything else for 2013.04 ARM still missing, people please yell at me.
Amicalement,
On 04/04/2013 10:20, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Tom,
Hi Albert,
Mainly I am waiting for Vincent's V10 to be tested a bit, and also I am going to post the fix for the __bss_end mixup. Anything else for 2013.04 ARM still missing, people please yell at me.
Apart my pull request I have sent now, what about Benoit's V10 ? As far as I read the series is ready for inclusion, and it has some improvement (MX3 fixes and MX5 NAND) that all i.MXlers like to have in the release.
Best regards, Stefano
Hi Stefano,
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 10:55:40 +0200, Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de wrote:
On 04/04/2013 10:20, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Tom,
Hi Albert,
Mainly I am waiting for Vincent's V10 to be tested a bit, and also I am going to post the fix for the __bss_end mixup. Anything else for 2013.04 ARM still missing, people please yell at me.
Apart my pull request I have sent now, what about Benoit's V10 ? As far as I read the series is ready for inclusion, and it has some improvement (MX3 fixes and MX5 NAND) that all i.MXlers like to have in the release.
... s/Vincent/Benoît/, with my apologies -- and this answers your question I guess.
Best regards, Stefano
Amicalement,
Hi all,
On 04/04/2013 10:20 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:33:03 -0400, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
Hey all,
I've tagged and pushed v2013.04-rc2 now. We're getting closer to the expected release date, but I hope to meet the deadline still.
If you have specific bugfixes, please hit me up and CC the list. Putting my u-boot-ti hat on, aside from the MMC1 bugfix I just posted, I Manfred Huber's TEMT fix.
Mainly I am waiting for Vincent's V10 to be tested a bit, and also I am going to post the fix for the __bss_end mixup. Anything else for 2013.04 ARM still missing, people please yell at me.
Hopefully the OMAP3 NAND BCH8 changes are accepted by Tom.
Apart from that I have some AT91 related changes (new Atmel BMP, one of the board changes in queue) for this release. I will send my PR for that before Friday evening CEST.
best regards
Andreas Bießmann
Hi Albert, Tom,
On 04/04/2013 10:20 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Mainly I am waiting for Vincent's V10 to be tested a bit, and also I am going to post the fix for the __bss_end mixup. Anything else for 2013.04 ARM still missing, people please yell at me.
I only want to drop a note that there are still some ARM related patches pending for 2013.04. They should run through the marvell tree. Prafulla is already aware of this: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-April/151229.html
Regards Holger
Hi Holger,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:34:09 +0200, Holger Brunck holger.brunck@keymile.com wrote:
Hi Albert, Tom,
On 04/04/2013 10:20 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Mainly I am waiting for Vincent's V10 to be tested a bit, and also I am going to post the fix for the __bss_end mixup. Anything else for 2013.04 ARM still missing, people please yell at me.
I only want to drop a note that there are still some ARM related patches pending for 2013.04. They should run through the marvell tree. Prafulla is already aware of this: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-April/151229.html
Thanks Holger. While Prafulla processes them, I'll gather them in a temporary branch here and build-test them to speed things up when the Marvell PR comes in. That would be:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212438/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212441/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212439/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212440/
Let me know (patchwork URLs) if any other patch should be considered.
Regards Holger
Amicalement,
-----Original Message----- From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.boot@aribaud.net] Sent: 11 April 2013 14:41 To: Holger Brunck Cc: Tom Rini; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar; Falauto, Gerlando Subject: Re: [STATUS] v2013.04-rc2 released
Hi Holger,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:34:09 +0200, Holger Brunck holger.brunck@keymile.com wrote:
Hi Albert, Tom,
On 04/04/2013 10:20 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Mainly I am waiting for Vincent's V10 to be tested
a bit, and also I
am going to post the fix for the __bss_end mixup.
Anything else for
2013.04 ARM still missing, people please yell at
me.
I only want to drop a note that there are still some
ARM related patches pending
for 2013.04. They should run through the marvell
tree. Prafulla is already aware
April/151229.html
Thanks Holger. While Prafulla processes them, I'll gather them in a temporary branch here and build-test them to speed things up when the Marvell PR comes in. That would be:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212438/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212441/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212439/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212440/
Let me know (patchwork URLs) if any other patch should be considered.
Dear Albert, Holger I am in process of sending pull request for the same. I am sorry for the delays since I was OOO.
Regards... Prafulla . . .
Hi Prafulla,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 23:12:19 -0700, Prafulla Wadaskar prafulla@marvell.com wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.boot@aribaud.net] Sent: 11 April 2013 14:41 To: Holger Brunck Cc: Tom Rini; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar; Falauto, Gerlando Subject: Re: [STATUS] v2013.04-rc2 released
Hi Holger,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:34:09 +0200, Holger Brunck holger.brunck@keymile.com wrote:
Hi Albert, Tom,
On 04/04/2013 10:20 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Mainly I am waiting for Vincent's V10 to be tested
a bit, and also I
am going to post the fix for the __bss_end mixup.
Anything else for
2013.04 ARM still missing, people please yell at
me.
I only want to drop a note that there are still some
ARM related patches pending
for 2013.04. They should run through the marvell
tree. Prafulla is already aware
April/151229.html
Thanks Holger. While Prafulla processes them, I'll gather them in a temporary branch here and build-test them to speed things up when the Marvell PR comes in. That would be:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212438/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212441/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212439/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212440/
Let me know (patchwork URLs) if any other patch should be considered.
Dear Albert, Holger I am in process of sending pull request for the same. I am sorry for the delays since I was OOO.
Prafulla,
Make sure you base your tree against current ARM ToT. For a few hours, ARM contained a series which broke PPC, and was rolled back to fix it.
Regards... Prafulla . . .
Amicalement,
-----Original Message----- From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.boot@aribaud.net] Sent: 12 April 2013 11:57 To: Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: Holger Brunck; Tom Rini; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Falauto, Gerlando Subject: Re: [STATUS] v2013.04-rc2 released
Hi Prafulla,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 23:12:19 -0700, Prafulla Wadaskar prafulla@marvell.com wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Albert ARIBAUD
[mailto:albert.u.boot@aribaud.net]
Sent: 11 April 2013 14:41 To: Holger Brunck Cc: Tom Rini; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prafulla
Wadaskar;
Falauto, Gerlando Subject: Re: [STATUS] v2013.04-rc2 released
Hi Holger,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:34:09 +0200, Holger Brunck holger.brunck@keymile.com wrote:
Hi Albert, Tom,
On 04/04/2013 10:20 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Mainly I am waiting for Vincent's V10 to be
tested
a bit, and also I
am going to post the fix for the __bss_end
mixup.
Anything else for
2013.04 ARM still missing, people please yell
at
me.
I only want to drop a note that there are still
some
ARM related patches pending
for 2013.04. They should run through the marvell
tree. Prafulla is already aware
April/151229.html
Thanks Holger. While Prafulla processes them, I'll gather them in a temporary branch here and build-test them to speed things up when the Marvell PR comes in. That would be:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212438/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212441/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212439/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212440/
Let me know (patchwork URLs) if any other patch
should
be considered.
Dear Albert, Holger I am in process of sending pull request for the same. I am sorry for the delays since I was OOO.
Prafulla,
Make sure you base your tree against current ARM ToT. For a few hours, ARM contained a series which broke PPC, and was rolled back to fix it.
Okay Albert, I will do it. BTW: what do you mean by "few hours"? Shall I rebase after few hours and then post the pull request. OR The patches are already in during last few hours?
Regards... Prafulla . . .
Regards... Prafulla . . .
Amicalement,
Albert.
Hi Prafulla,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 23:38:06 -0700, Prafulla Wadaskar prafulla@marvell.com wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.boot@aribaud.net] Sent: 12 April 2013 11:57 To: Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: Holger Brunck; Tom Rini; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Falauto, Gerlando Subject: Re: [STATUS] v2013.04-rc2 released
Hi Prafulla,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 23:12:19 -0700, Prafulla Wadaskar prafulla@marvell.com wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Albert ARIBAUD
[mailto:albert.u.boot@aribaud.net]
Sent: 11 April 2013 14:41 To: Holger Brunck Cc: Tom Rini; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prafulla
Wadaskar;
Falauto, Gerlando Subject: Re: [STATUS] v2013.04-rc2 released
Hi Holger,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:34:09 +0200, Holger Brunck holger.brunck@keymile.com wrote:
Hi Albert, Tom,
On 04/04/2013 10:20 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Mainly I am waiting for Vincent's V10 to be
tested
a bit, and also I
am going to post the fix for the __bss_end
mixup.
Anything else for
2013.04 ARM still missing, people please yell
at
me.
I only want to drop a note that there are still
some
ARM related patches pending
for 2013.04. They should run through the marvell
tree. Prafulla is already aware
April/151229.html
Thanks Holger. While Prafulla processes them, I'll gather them in a temporary branch here and build-test them to speed things up when the Marvell PR comes in. That would be:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212438/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212441/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212439/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212440/
Let me know (patchwork URLs) if any other patch
should
be considered.
Dear Albert, Holger I am in process of sending pull request for the same. I am sorry for the delays since I was OOO.
Prafulla,
Make sure you base your tree against current ARM ToT. For a few hours, ARM contained a series which broke PPC, and was rolled back to fix it.
Okay Albert, I will do it. BTW: what do you mean by "few hours"? Shall I rebase after few hours and then post the pull request. OR The patches are already in during last few hours?
Details are in my post "[ARM] Rollback *again* -- 5 patches"
Regards... Prafulla . . .
Amicalement,
Hi Tom,
Tom Rini wrote:
If you have specific bugfixes, please hit me up and CC the list.
[U-Boot] powerpc/lib: fix unsafe register handling in wait_ticks (2012-01-27)
Out of curiosity and perhaps to have better success in the future; what is the reason that this patch hasn't made it into the release?
BR // Mats
Dear Mats Kärrman,
In message ED3E0BCACD909541BA94A34C4A164D4C4297FE75@post.tritech.se you wrote:
Tom Rini wrote:
If you have specific bugfixes, please hit me up and CC the list.
[U-Boot] powerpc/lib: fix unsafe register handling in wait_ticks (2012-01-27)
Out of curiosity and perhaps to have better success in the future; what is the reason that this patch hasn't made it into the release?
Lack of resources? I haven't heard anything of Andy for more than a month...
Scott - do you happen to know anything about Andy's whereabouts?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
On 04/04/2013 08:12:07 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Mats Kärrman,
In message ED3E0BCACD909541BA94A34C4A164D4C4297FE75@post.tritech.se you wrote:
Tom Rini wrote:
If you have specific bugfixes, please hit me up and CC the list.
[U-Boot] powerpc/lib: fix unsafe register handling in wait_ticks (2012-01-27)
Out of curiosity and perhaps to have better success in the future;
what is the reason that this patch hasn't made it into the release?
Lack of resources? I haven't heard anything of Andy for more than a month...
Scott - do you happen to know anything about Andy's whereabouts?
He's still around -- probably busy.
-Scott
Hi Tom,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
Hey all,
I've tagged and pushed v2013.04-rc2 now. We're getting closer to the expected release date, but I hope to meet the deadline still.
Great!
First, a word of warning. The syntax for 'ext4write' was changed to match the rest of the filesystem read/write commands. If you had scripts or other things using this, please change them.
Now, I know Albert is working on a pull request for u-boot-arm and in turn waiting on a few other changes to come in still.
Next, we haven't met the goal of having the TPM related codebase and usage sorted out, but that's not a failing on the side of the folks pushing the code, so we aren't going to rip that out. But I'm not going to pull the 45 part series in just before the release either.
Sounds reasonable - at this stage I don't think we have any choice as it is too late for this code to have a decent test period. There is also the FIT image code refactor and test, that sits on top of those. It's quite painful to rebase though so I would appreciate it if could be considered early in the next cycle.
Given the interest in the TPM code, it would be good if we could bring in the pending TPM patches to this release so that U-Boot has everything up to date on that. For example the sboot code you pointed me to makes quite heavily use of the TPM and the 'tpm' command and associated that Che-Liang wrote would be useful here. If you are happy to bring that in for this release I will go through and create a bundle for it, and test it on snow.
I also plan to send you a patman/buildman pull, plus get the the cros_ec series picked up.
If you have specific bugfixes, please hit me up and CC the list. Putting my u-boot-ti hat on, aside from the MMC1 bugfix I just posted, I Manfred Huber's TEMT fix.
Will do.
Regards, Simon
Hi,
-----Original Message----- From: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Simon Glass Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 10:25 PM To: Tom Rini Cc: U-Boot Mailing List Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] v2013.04-rc2 released
Hi Tom,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
Hey all,
I've tagged and pushed v2013.04-rc2 now. We're getting
closer to the
expected release date, but I hope to meet the deadline still.
[...]
Given the interest in the TPM code, it would be good if we could bring in the pending TPM patches to this release so that U-Boot has everything up to date on that. For example the sboot code you pointed me to makes quite heavily use of the TPM and the 'tpm' command and associated that Che-Liang wrote would be useful here. If you are happy to bring that in for this release I will go through and create a bundle for it, and test it on snow.
I also plan to send you a patman/buildman pull, plus get the
We (at gdsys) are working on U-Boot code to support our new board and this code depends on Che-Liang Chious TPM patch. (We currently plan to submit the patch set soon and hope it gets into the the next release (2013.07).)
I made some extensions to Che-Liangs TPM lib which adds support for authorized TPM commands and adds single authorized versions of two TPM commands (LoadKey2 and GetPubKey)). (Of course separatly configurable since this authorization stuff adds some amount of code.) But I'm not sure if I can submit a patch on the U-Boot ML which requires another patch (namely Che-Liang Chious TPM patch) which is not already in the main line.
If Che-Liangs work gets into 2013.04 it would be great and we would happily base on it when we publish our next changes.
Greetings, Reinhard Pfau.
Hi Reinhard,
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:48:55 +0200, "Pfau, Reinhard" Pfau@gdsys.de wrote:
But I'm not sure if I can submit a patch on the U-Boot ML which requires another patch (namely Che-Liang Chious TPM patch) which is not already in the main line.
Yes you can, provided you clearly state the dependency, and ideally, provided you submit rebased patches whenever the patch(es) you depend upon get a new version submitted -- especially if rebasing is not trivial.
If Che-Liangs work gets into 2013.04 it would be great and we would happily base on it when we publish our next changes.
Note that even if Che-Liang's work only went in for 2013.07, that would not prevent your patches from going into it as well.
Greetings, Reinhard Pfau.
Amicalement,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2013 04:24 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com mailto:trini@ti.com> wrote:
Hey all,
I've tagged and pushed v2013.04-rc2 now. We're getting closer to the expected release date, but I hope to meet the deadline still.
Great!
First, a word of warning. The syntax for 'ext4write' was changed to match the rest of the filesystem read/write commands. If you had scripts or other things using this, please change them.
Now, I know Albert is working on a pull request for u-boot-arm and in turn waiting on a few other changes to come in still.
Next, we haven't met the goal of having the TPM related codebase and usage sorted out, but that's not a failing on the side of the folks pushing the code, so we aren't going to rip that out. But I'm not going to pull the 45 part series in just before the release either.
Sounds reasonable - at this stage I don't think we have any choice as it is too late for this code to have a decent test period. There is also the FIT image code refactor and test, that sits on top of those. It's quite painful to rebase though so I would appreciate it if could be considered early in the next cycle.
Agreed.
Given the interest in the TPM code, it would be good if we could bring in the pending TPM patches to this release so that U-Boot has everything up to date on that. For example the sboot code you pointed me to makes quite heavily use of the TPM and the 'tpm' command and associated that Che-Liang wrote would be useful here. If you are happy to bring that in for this release I will go through and create a bundle for it, and test it on snow.
OK. Can you please put together a pull request or bundle for all of the TPM stuff that's ready to go, and was v1'd before the window closed?
I also plan to send you a patman/buildman pull, plus get the the cros_ec series picked up.
Looking at patman/buildman now, I wasn't sure if the cros_ec things should go via u-boot-samsung or not.
- -- Tom
Hi Tom,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2013 04:24 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com mailto:trini@ti.com> wrote:
Hey all,
I've tagged and pushed v2013.04-rc2 now. We're getting closer to the expected release date, but I hope to meet the deadline still.
Great!
First, a word of warning. The syntax for 'ext4write' was changed to match the rest of the filesystem read/write commands. If you had scripts or other things using this, please change them.
Now, I know Albert is working on a pull request for u-boot-arm and in turn waiting on a few other changes to come in still.
Next, we haven't met the goal of having the TPM related codebase and usage sorted out, but that's not a failing on the side of the folks pushing the code, so we aren't going to rip that out. But I'm not going to pull the 45 part series in just before the release either.
Sounds reasonable - at this stage I don't think we have any choice as it is too late for this code to have a decent test period. There is also the FIT image code refactor and test, that sits on top of those. It's quite painful to rebase though so I would appreciate it if could be considered early in the next cycle.
Agreed.
Thanks. I will update and resend as needed.
Given the interest in the TPM code, it would be good if we could bring in the pending TPM patches to this release so that U-Boot has everything up to date on that. For example the sboot code you pointed me to makes quite heavily use of the TPM and the 'tpm' command and associated that Che-Liang wrote would be useful here. If you are happy to bring that in for this release I will go through and create a bundle for it, and test it on snow.
OK. Can you please put together a pull request or bundle for all of the TPM stuff that's ready to go, and was v1'd before the window closed?
Yes I will. I am currently testing it on snow and am away tomorrow, so it will be Wed Thu before I send it.
I also plan to send you a patman/buildman pull, plus get the the cros_ec series picked up.
Looking at patman/buildman now, I wasn't sure if the cros_ec things should go via u-boot-samsung or not.
I was expecting not, but they could do.
Regards, Simon
Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRYusPAAoJENk4IS6UOR1WcqEP/2eyNShteAgybGLkNxUDHbd3 EKxz9ZrVOpKwh1fAW3rL9Wq47xEjtIFpumWdrv7Dl4EkxB6iSBgvC3YqSQ7tknK7 0c14DEVqxNMwo32SdXwPJxLRj00CFMoaHLELcj49rTV7vqlL1faQqJYWAWE02GNo 0jcq/ec0XHfLB6SfxkJcLMplC8VIlGNEdIHROZJ8nlm9KvZPfUssXsNVdUXHyuro 2OtBdm4i7i0H0Mu7aHfynh/CsFhG9pKNj6+ELbYBRDocjx+pzTSUJ+ZbDsGXkKTo ro/LLDVdBWT+2824zov4iRNjmxy/H0+OdwVbv88CliSfYaoM3lSiYvE63kHJHaKU T26IJqojFx9bQa1eMnyVYDcMGfrwhCrTtW6dQBxFeI1kMHxmYhc9XDzZ5wtO/+cn +wQjRVxgyW5h/Iu7Dw6oQVPKqUGaS8zbRbNHO8cxnvV6BCs1G8JWLUFvDzgxD+Rf znbqY2VufCK8IWxaoWcUp4cU/+B/JR7DRAwQpWyPr2xGH4ypIT6edaWlI/ZO7Nf4 azXs9p8Qaebi7SjzdhTyb4bqO5k3UIlyRsCe8YthGwAvfVClAfCFG+3jQdbkIA1q FyT3wXh2mcusnLKRJ7uKsChrWfKSM7bgjZHSXfpuSYBzRY1vUjIMY/AHQU/y0+nv XGv5HbtoqhiA+8qqyciF =B7VJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (11)
-
Albert ARIBAUD -
Andreas Bießmann -
Holger Brunck -
Mats Kärrman -
Pfau, Reinhard -
Prafulla Wadaskar -
Scott Wood -
Simon Glass -
Stefano Babic -
Tom Rini -
Wolfgang Denk