[U-Boot] [PATCH] sparc: add asm/unaligned.h
It isn't possible to build any sparc boards without this ...
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vapier@gentoo.org --- arch/sparc/include/asm/unaligned.h | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/sparc/include/asm/unaligned.h
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/unaligned.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/unaligned.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6cecbbb --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/unaligned.h @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +#include <asm-generic/unaligned.h>
Mike Frysinger wrote:
It isn't possible to build any sparc boards without this ...
I'm working on a new patch set with some of the patches going through the net repo instead, according to Wolfgangs comments. It is probably easier for me to make fewer commits every time submitting, and submitting multiple times.
Daniel
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vapier@gentoo.org
arch/sparc/include/asm/unaligned.h | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/sparc/include/asm/unaligned.h
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/unaligned.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/unaligned.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6cecbbb --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/unaligned.h @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +#include <asm-generic/unaligned.h>
Dear Daniel Hellstrom,
In message 4CC54D00.6040702@gaisler.com you wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
It isn't possible to build any sparc boards without this ...
I'm working on a new patch set with some of the patches going through the net repo instead, according to Wolfgangs comments. It is probably easier for me to make fewer commits every time submitting, and submitting multiple times.
But it looks like a serious bug fix, so it should go in _now_, should it not?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Daniel Hellstrom,
In message 4CC54D00.6040702@gaisler.com you wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
It isn't possible to build any sparc boards without this ...
I'm working on a new patch set with some of the patches going through the net repo instead, according to Wolfgangs comments. It is probably easier for me to make fewer commits every time submitting, and submitting multiple times.
But it looks like a serious bug fix, so it should go in _now_, should it not?
True, I will send a pull request since this patch have already been sent on the list two or three times.
Daniel
participants (3)
-
Daniel Hellstrom -
Mike Frysinger -
Wolfgang Denk