Dear users,

I'm porting the u-boot 1.1.2 to our hardware which has two banks of AM29LV256 chips (32M, 512 sectors x 64K each). So I have the following #defines:

CFG_MAX_FLASH_BANKS 2 CFG_MAX_FLASH_SECT 512

Now I'm crashing in function flash_init() before calling flash_get_size(). My assumption is that the data structure flash_info[] has become too big, in disassembly I see the following:

0xfff38258 <flash_info+3664>: .long 0x0 0xfff3825c <flash_info+3668>: .long 0x0 0xfff38260 <flash_info+3672>: .long 0x0 0xfff38264 <flash_info+3676>: .long 0x0 0xfff38268 <flash_info+3680>: .long 0x0 0xfff3826c <flash_info+3684>: .long 0x0 0xfff38270 <flash_info+3688>: .long 0x0 0xfff38274 <flash_info+3692>: .long 0x0 0xfff38278 <flash_info+3696>: .long 0x0 0xfff3827c <flash_info+3700>: .long 0x0 0xfff38280 <flash_info+3704>: .long 0x0 0xfff38284 <_SDA_BASE_>: .long 0x0 0xfff38288 <_SDA_BASE_+4>: .long 0x0 0xfff3828c <_SDA_BASE_+8>: .long 0x0 0xfff38290 <_SDA_BASE_+12>: .long 0x0 0xfff38294 <_SDA_BASE_+16>: .long 0x0 0xfff38298 <_SDA_BASE_+20>: .long 0x0 0xfff3829c <_SDA_BASE_+24>: .long 0x0 0xfff382a0 <_SDA_BASE_+28>: .long 0x0 0xfff382a4 <_SDA_BASE_+32>: .long 0x0 0xfff382a8 <_SDA_BASE_+36>: .long 0x0 0xfff382ac <_SDA_BASE_+40>: .long 0x0 0xfff382b0 <_SDA_BASE_+44>: .long 0x0 0xfff382b4 <_SDA2_BASE_>: .long 0x0 0xfff382b8 <_SDA2_BASE_+4>: .long 0x0 0xfff382bc <_SDA2_BASE_+8>: .long 0x0

Does it look as an overlap? How can I overcome this?

Thanks in advance,

Alexander Perkalskite.

--------------------------------- Yahoo! for Good Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.