[PATCH v2] pinctrl: Check pinconfig nodes pre-reloc status recursively

Pinconfig nodes normally bind recursively with PINCTRL_FULL and PINCONF_RECURSIVE enabled. However, during U-Boot proper pre-relocation any node marked with e.g. bootph-all will not bind unless its parent is also marked for pre-reloc.
group1 { pinconf1 { bootph-all; }; };
This cause the following warning message to be shown during U-Boot proper pre-reloc stage on Rockchip devices, e.g on RK3568:
ns16550_serial serial@fe660000: pinctrl_select_state_full: uclass_get_device_by_phandle_id: err=-19
and on RK3328:
ns16550_serial serial@ff130000: pinctrl_select_state_full: uclass_get_device_by_phandle_id: err=-19
Check pinconfig nodes pre-reloc status recursively to fix this and to make pinconfig_post_bind work same at both U-Boot proper pre-reloc and at TPL/SPL stage.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman jonas@kwiboo.se --- v2: - No change
A recent change to fdtgrep was believed to solve this however, fdtgrep is only applied to control fdt for xPL so this issue still exist at U-Boot proper pre-reloc stage.
Link to v1: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1817296/ --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-uclass.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-uclass.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-uclass.c index 73dd7b1038bb..fe2ba5021a78 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-uclass.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-uclass.c @@ -100,6 +100,22 @@ static int pinctrl_select_state_full(struct udevice *dev, const char *statename) return 0; }
+static bool ofnode_pre_reloc_recursive(ofnode parent) +{ + ofnode child; + + if (ofnode_pre_reloc(parent)) + return true; + + if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(PINCONF_RECURSIVE)) { + ofnode_for_each_subnode(child, parent) + if (ofnode_pre_reloc_recursive(child)) + return true; + } + + return false; +} + /** * pinconfig_post_bind() - post binding for PINCONFIG uclass * Recursively bind its children as pinconfig devices. @@ -119,7 +135,7 @@ static int pinconfig_post_bind(struct udevice *dev)
dev_for_each_subnode(node, dev) { if (pre_reloc_only && - !ofnode_pre_reloc(node)) + !ofnode_pre_reloc_recursive(node)) continue; /* * If this node has "compatible" property, this is not

Hi Jonas,
On 2/17/24 13:08, Jonas Karlman wrote:
Pinconfig nodes normally bind recursively with PINCTRL_FULL and PINCONF_RECURSIVE enabled. However, during U-Boot proper pre-relocation any node marked with e.g. bootph-all will not bind unless its parent is also marked for pre-reloc.
group1 { pinconf1 { bootph-all; }; };
This cause the following warning message to be shown during U-Boot proper pre-reloc stage on Rockchip devices, e.g on RK3568:
ns16550_serial serial@fe660000: pinctrl_select_state_full: uclass_get_device_by_phandle_id: err=-19
and on RK3328:
ns16550_serial serial@ff130000: pinctrl_select_state_full: uclass_get_device_by_phandle_id: err=-19
Check pinconfig nodes pre-reloc status recursively to fix this and to make pinconfig_post_bind work same at both U-Boot proper pre-reloc and at TPL/SPL stage.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman jonas@kwiboo.se
v2:
- No change
A recent change to fdtgrep was believed to solve this however, fdtgrep is only applied to control fdt for xPL so this issue still exist at U-Boot proper pre-reloc stage.
Link to v1: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1817296/
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-uclass.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-uclass.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-uclass.c index 73dd7b1038bb..fe2ba5021a78 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-uclass.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-uclass.c @@ -100,6 +100,22 @@ static int pinctrl_select_state_full(struct udevice *dev, const char *statename) return 0; }
+static bool ofnode_pre_reloc_recursive(ofnode parent) +{
- ofnode child;
- if (ofnode_pre_reloc(parent))
return true;
- if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(PINCONF_RECURSIVE)) {
You could move the ofnode child declaration here for limiting the scope.
I also got confused by "parent" name, as it isn't actually the parent we're looking at right now, but the node itself, so it was a bit misleading. I would have kept "node" and the "child" one is explicit enough.
In any case,
Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com
Thanks, Quentin

On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 12:08:40PM +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote:
Pinconfig nodes normally bind recursively with PINCTRL_FULL and PINCONF_RECURSIVE enabled. However, during U-Boot proper pre-relocation any node marked with e.g. bootph-all will not bind unless its parent is also marked for pre-reloc.
group1 { pinconf1 { bootph-all; }; };
This cause the following warning message to be shown during U-Boot proper pre-reloc stage on Rockchip devices, e.g on RK3568:
ns16550_serial serial@fe660000: pinctrl_select_state_full: uclass_get_device_by_phandle_id: err=-19
and on RK3328:
ns16550_serial serial@ff130000: pinctrl_select_state_full: uclass_get_device_by_phandle_id: err=-19
Check pinconfig nodes pre-reloc status recursively to fix this and to make pinconfig_post_bind work same at both U-Boot proper pre-reloc and at TPL/SPL stage.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman jonas@kwiboo.se
Applied to u-boot/next, thanks!
participants (3)
-
Jonas Karlman
-
Quentin Schulz
-
Tom Rini