[U-Boot] [PATCH] 85xx: Always attempt ethernet device tree fixup

Its reasonable that we may have ethernet devices but dont have drivers or support enabled for them in u-boot and want the device tree fixed up. Unconditionally calling the ethernet fixup is fine since if we dont have ethernet nodes that match (or aliases) we will not attempt to do anything.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala galak@kernel.crashing.org --- cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c | 3 --- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c b/cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c index 26a8f48..a692529 100644 --- a/cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c +++ b/cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c @@ -278,12 +278,9 @@ void ft_cpu_setup(void *blob, bd_t *bd) if (!IS_E_PROCESSOR(get_svr())) fdt_fixup_crypto_node(blob, 0);
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAS_ETH0) || defined(CONFIG_HAS_ETH1) ||\ - defined(CONFIG_HAS_ETH2) || defined(CONFIG_HAS_ETH3) fdt_fixup_ethernet(blob);
fdt_add_enet_stashing(blob); -#endif
do_fixup_by_prop_u32(blob, "device_type", "cpu", 4, "timebase-frequency", bd->bi_busfreq / 8, 1);

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Kumar Gala galak@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
Its reasonable that we may have ethernet devices but dont have drivers or support enabled for them in u-boot and want the device tree fixed up. Unconditionally calling the ethernet fixup is fine since if we dont have ethernet nodes that match (or aliases) we will not attempt to do anything.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala galak@kernel.crashing.org
Acked-by: Timur Tabi timur@freescale.com
participants (2)
-
Kumar Gala
-
Timur Tabi