Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9 0/31] Create generic board init for ARM, x86, PPC
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
This series creates a generic board init implementation which contains the essential functions of the major arch/xxx/lib/board.c files. It is split into two parts: board_f.c for pre-relocation and board_r.c for post-relocation.
I forgot to mention that if anyone wants to try this out on their board, the tree is at
http://git.denx.de/u-boot-x86.git
branch 'us-board-v11'
Regards, Simon
Hi Simon,
On 03/13/2013 04:52 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
This series creates a generic board init implementation which contains the essential functions of the major arch/xxx/lib/board.c files. It is split into two parts: board_f.c for pre-relocation and board_r.c for post-relocation.
I tested the whole series on avr32. The minor changes there do not break runtime behaviour, therefore
Tested-by: Andreas Bießmann andreas.biessmann@googlemail.com
Will this series be applied for upcomming release? I'm asking cause of
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/225225/
vs
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/220413/
Best regards
Andreas Bießmann
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:16:23PM +0100, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 03/13/2013 04:52 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
This series creates a generic board init implementation which contains the essential functions of the major arch/xxx/lib/board.c files. It is split into two parts: board_f.c for pre-relocation and board_r.c for post-relocation.
I tested the whole series on avr32. The minor changes there do not break runtime behaviour, therefore
Tested-by: Andreas Bie?mann andreas.biessmann@googlemail.com
Will this series be applied for upcomming release? I'm asking cause of
Seeing as there's Wolfgang's tested/ack yes, this is quite likely to go in. Need to review it all again myself to be sure. Simon, can you please make a patchwork bundle out of it as well so I can be sure all of the patches are updated right (ie we have the old ones cleared out and the new ones assigned to me). Thanks!
Hi Tom,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:16:23PM +0100, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 03/13/2013 04:52 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
This series creates a generic board init implementation which contains the essential functions of the major arch/xxx/lib/board.c files. It is split into two parts: board_f.c for pre-relocation and board_r.c for post-relocation.
I tested the whole series on avr32. The minor changes there do not break runtime behaviour, therefore
Tested-by: Andreas Bie?mann andreas.biessmann@googlemail.com
Will this series be applied for upcomming release? I'm asking cause of
Seeing as there's Wolfgang's tested/ack yes, this is quite likely to go in. Need to review it all again myself to be sure. Simon, can you please make a patchwork bundle out of it as well so I can be sure all of the patches are updated right (ie we have the old ones cleared out and the new ones assigned to me). Thanks!
I found that one patch (2/31) needed a rev due to a recent change. I resent this so it should hit patchwork soon.
I did create a bundle but things were in the wrong order, so I will try again when that happens.
In the meantime there is a tree at u-boot-x86.git branch us-board-v11, and I can do a pull request if you like.
Regards, Simon
-- Tom
Hi Tom,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:16:23PM +0100, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 03/13/2013 04:52 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
This series creates a generic board init implementation which contains the essential functions of the major arch/xxx/lib/board.c files. It is split into two parts: board_f.c for pre-relocation and board_r.c for post-relocation.
I tested the whole series on avr32. The minor changes there do not break runtime behaviour, therefore
Tested-by: Andreas Bie?mann andreas.biessmann@googlemail.com
Will this series be applied for upcomming release? I'm asking cause of
Seeing as there's Wolfgang's tested/ack yes, this is quite likely to go in. Need to review it all again myself to be sure. Simon, can you please make a patchwork bundle out of it as well so I can be sure all of the patches are updated right (ie we have the old ones cleared out and the new ones assigned to me). Thanks!
I found that one patch (2/31) needed a rev due to a recent change. I resent this so it should hit patchwork soon.
I did create a bundle but things were in the wrong order, so I will try again when that happens.
In the meantime there is a tree at u-boot-x86.git branch us-board-v11, and I can do a pull request if you like.
Please see the patchwork bundle here:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/sjg/us-board/
I had to rebase one of the patches and resend to the mailing this. But I just tried this bundle and it applied cleanly to master for me.
Regards, Simon
Regards, Simon
-- Tom
participants (3)
-
Andreas Bießmann -
Simon Glass -
Tom Rini