[U-Boot] [PATCH] common, image: introduce new uimage types

- ubootimage U-Boot image - splimage SPL image - dfenvimage Default Environment image - ublheader TI davinci UBL header image
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher hs@denx.de --- common/image.c | 6 +++++- include/image.h | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/image.c b/common/image.c index 202c8a1..aca1318 100644 --- a/common/image.c +++ b/common/image.c @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ static const table_entry_t uimage_os[] = {
static const table_entry_t uimage_type[] = { { IH_TYPE_AISIMAGE, "aisimage", "Davinci AIS image",}, + { IH_TYPE_DFENVIMAGE, "dfenvimage", "default Env image", }, { IH_TYPE_FILESYSTEM, "filesystem", "Filesystem Image", }, { IH_TYPE_FIRMWARE, "firmware", "Firmware", }, { IH_TYPE_FLATDT, "flat_dt", "Flat Device Tree", }, @@ -145,8 +146,11 @@ static const table_entry_t uimage_type[] = { { IH_TYPE_OMAPIMAGE, "omapimage", "TI OMAP SPL With GP CH",}, { IH_TYPE_RAMDISK, "ramdisk", "RAMDisk Image", }, { IH_TYPE_SCRIPT, "script", "Script", }, + { IH_TYPE_SPLIMAGE, "splimage", "SPL image", }, { IH_TYPE_STANDALONE, "standalone", "Standalone Program", }, - { IH_TYPE_UBLIMAGE, "ublimage", "Davinci UBL image",}, + { IH_TYPE_UBOOTIMAGE, "ubootimage", "U-Boot image", }, + { IH_TYPE_UBLHEADER, "ublheader", "UBL header image", }, + { IH_TYPE_UBLIMAGE, "ublimage", "Davinci UBL image", }, { -1, "", "", }, };
diff --git a/include/image.h b/include/image.h index bbf80f0..3b5bd51 100644 --- a/include/image.h +++ b/include/image.h @@ -164,6 +164,10 @@ #define IH_TYPE_OMAPIMAGE 12 /* TI OMAP Config Header Image */ #define IH_TYPE_AISIMAGE 13 /* TI Davinci AIS Image */ #define IH_TYPE_KERNEL_NOLOAD 14 /* OS Kernel Image, can run from any load address */ +#define IH_TYPE_UBOOTIMAGE 15 /* U-Boot image */ +#define IH_TYPE_SPLIMAGE 16 /* SPL image */ +#define IH_TYPE_DFENVIMAGE 17 /* default Environment Image */ +#define IH_TYPE_UBLHEADER 18 /* UBL Header image */
/* * Compression Types

Hello Mike,
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 15 January 2012 02:45:49 Heiko Schocher wrote:
- ubootimage U-Boot image
- splimage SPL image
- dfenvimage Default Environment image
- ublheader TI davinci UBL header image
for ... ?
Oh, right, forgotten to add this in the commit message.
They are needed for cam_enc_4xx update:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/136165/
There, the UBL-header, SPL-image, U-Boot image and an default image are wrapped in one FIT image.
is it even possible to `bootm` these currently ?
No.
bye, Heiko

Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 4F13C325.3010200@denx.de you wrote:
- ubootimage U-Boot image
- splimage SPL image
- dfenvimage Default Environment image
- ublheader TI davinci UBL header image
for ... ?
Oh, right, forgotten to add this in the commit message.
They are needed for cam_enc_4xx update:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/136165/
There, the UBL-header, SPL-image, U-Boot image and an default image are wrapped in one FIT image.
But this is conceptually broken. The IH_TYPE_* definitions are actually only relevant for legacy images.
FIX images use an XML based, extendable data format. The whole idea of this is that we do NOT have to change to code when anybody needs a new (probably private) entry or type or whatever.
In your case, it should be possible to use an existing image type (say, IH_TYPE_FIRMWARE) for your code, and use other distinguishing marks to determine which parts you work on. Probably it makes sense to define your own entry for each of the parts. Then only your own code needs to understand this.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk

Hello Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 4F13C325.3010200@denx.de you wrote:
- ubootimage U-Boot image
- splimage SPL image
- dfenvimage Default Environment image
- ublheader TI davinci UBL header image
for ... ?
Oh, right, forgotten to add this in the commit message.
They are needed for cam_enc_4xx update:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/136165/
There, the UBL-header, SPL-image, U-Boot image and an default image are wrapped in one FIT image.
But this is conceptually broken. The IH_TYPE_* definitions are actually only relevant for legacy images.
FIX images use an XML based, extendable data format. The whole idea of this is that we do NOT have to change to code when anybody needs a new (probably private) entry or type or whatever.
In your case, it should be possible to use an existing image type (say, IH_TYPE_FIRMWARE) for your code, and use other distinguishing marks to determine which parts you work on. Probably it makes sense to define your own entry for each of the parts. Then only your own code needs to understand this.
Yep, you are right, rework this.
bye, Heiko
participants (3)
-
Heiko Schocher
-
Mike Frysinger
-
Wolfgang Denk