cpu.c: In function 'cpu_eth_init': cpu.c:371: warning: implicit declaration of function 'uec_standard_init'
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala galak@kernel.crashing.org --- include/netdev.h | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/netdev.h b/include/netdev.h index aed5c4c..92eceb1 100644 --- a/include/netdev.h +++ b/include/netdev.h @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ int e1000_initialize(bd_t *bis); int eepro100_initialize(bd_t *bis); int eth_3com_initialize (bd_t * bis); int fec_initialize (bd_t *bis); +int uec_standard_init(bd_t *bis); int greth_initialize(bd_t *bis); void gt6426x_eth_initialize(bd_t *bis); int inca_switch_initialize(bd_t *bis);
On Jun 17, 2009, at 8:22 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
cpu.c: In function 'cpu_eth_init': cpu.c:371: warning: implicit declaration of function 'uec_standard_init'
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala galak@kernel.crashing.org
include/netdev.h | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/netdev.h b/include/netdev.h index aed5c4c..92eceb1 100644 --- a/include/netdev.h +++ b/include/netdev.h @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ int e1000_initialize(bd_t *bis); int eepro100_initialize(bd_t *bis); int eth_3com_initialize (bd_t * bis); int fec_initialize (bd_t *bis); +int uec_standard_init(bd_t *bis); int greth_initialize(bd_t *bis); void gt6426x_eth_initialize(bd_t *bis); int inca_switch_initialize(bd_t *bis); -- 1.6.0.6
Ben,
This should address the warning that Richard reported. Feel free to pick this up via the net tree.
- k
Kumar Gala wrote:
cpu.c: In function 'cpu_eth_init': cpu.c:371: warning: implicit declaration of function 'uec_standard_init'
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala galak@kernel.crashing.org
include/netdev.h | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/netdev.h b/include/netdev.h index aed5c4c..92eceb1 100644 --- a/include/netdev.h +++ b/include/netdev.h @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ int e1000_initialize(bd_t *bis); int eepro100_initialize(bd_t *bis); int eth_3com_initialize (bd_t * bis); int fec_initialize (bd_t *bis); +int uec_standard_init(bd_t *bis); int greth_initialize(bd_t *bis); void gt6426x_eth_initialize(bd_t *bis); int inca_switch_initialize(bd_t *bis);
Applied to net repo.
thanks, Ben
Kumar Gala wrote:
cpu.c: In function 'cpu_eth_init': cpu.c:371: warning: implicit declaration of function 'uec_standard_init'
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala galak@kernel.crashing.org
include/netdev.h | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/netdev.h b/include/netdev.h index aed5c4c..92eceb1 100644 --- a/include/netdev.h +++ b/include/netdev.h @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ int e1000_initialize(bd_t *bis); int eepro100_initialize(bd_t *bis); int eth_3com_initialize (bd_t * bis); int fec_initialize (bd_t *bis); +int uec_standard_init(bd_t *bis); int greth_initialize(bd_t *bis); void gt6426x_eth_initialize(bd_t *bis); int inca_switch_initialize(bd_t *bis);
I'm not sure why I applied this - the prototype is already there and this is not sorted alphabetically.
Anyway, reverted and you shouldn't get the warning.
regards, Ben
On Jul 23, 2009, at 12:55 AM, Ben Warren wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
cpu.c: In function 'cpu_eth_init': cpu.c:371: warning: implicit declaration of function 'uec_standard_init'
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala galak@kernel.crashing.org
include/netdev.h | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/netdev.h b/include/netdev.h index aed5c4c..92eceb1 100644 --- a/include/netdev.h +++ b/include/netdev.h @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ int e1000_initialize(bd_t *bis); int eepro100_initialize(bd_t *bis); int eth_3com_initialize (bd_t * bis); int fec_initialize (bd_t *bis); +int uec_standard_init(bd_t *bis); int greth_initialize(bd_t *bis); void gt6426x_eth_initialize(bd_t *bis); int inca_switch_initialize(bd_t *bis);
I'm not sure why I applied this - the prototype is already there and this is not sorted alphabetically.
Anyway, reverted and you shouldn't get the warning.
I think part of that was because Wolfgang already applied a similar fix himself.
- k
participants (2)
-
Ben Warren -
Kumar Gala