Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 7/7] Exynos: Clock: Cleanup soc_get_periph_rate

Hi,
Hi Akshay,
On 02/03/2015 05:27 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote:
Cleaning up soc_get_periph_rate to make the logic easy to comprehend.
Could you give more detailed description?
We did just a cleanup here by removing I2C sepecific calculations because we can now have a generic div and pre-div calculation. Only intention of doing it is making code clean and easily understandable. I don't know what else to write for that. Please suggest. :)
Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat akshay.s@samsung.com
Changes since v4:
- New patch.
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c index 3884d4b..8724bc7 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c @@ -366,8 +366,8 @@ static struct clk_bit_info *get_clk_bit_info(int peripheral) static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral) { struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = get_clk_bit_info(peripheral);
- unsigned long sclk, sub_clk = 0;
- unsigned int src, div, sub_div = 0;
- unsigned long sclk = 0;
- unsigned int src = 0, div = 0, sub_div = 0; struct exynos5_clock *clk = (struct exynos5_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
@@ -389,30 +389,30 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral) break; case PERIPH_ID_I2S0: src = readl(&clk->src_mau);
div = readl(&clk->div_mau);
case PERIPH_ID_SPI0: case PERIPH_ID_SPI1: src = readl(&clk->src_peric1);div = sub_div = readl(&clk->div_mau);
div = readl(&clk->div_peric1);
break; case PERIPH_ID_SPI2: src = readl(&clk->src_peric1);div = sub_div = readl(&clk->div_peric1);
div = readl(&clk->div_peric2);
break; case PERIPH_ID_SPI3: case PERIPH_ID_SPI4: src = readl(&clk->sclk_src_isp);div = sub_div = readl(&clk->div_peric2);
div = readl(&clk->sclk_div_isp);
break; case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0: case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1: src = readl(&clk->src_fsys);div = sub_div = readl(&clk->sclk_div_isp);
div = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
break; case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2: case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC3: src = readl(&clk->src_fsys);div = sub_div = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
div = readl(&clk->div_fsys2);
break; case PERIPH_ID_I2C0: case PERIPH_ID_I2C1:div = sub_div = readl(&clk->div_fsys2);
@@ -422,12 +422,10 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral) case PERIPH_ID_I2C5: case PERIPH_ID_I2C6: case PERIPH_ID_I2C7:
sclk = exynos5_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
sub_div = ((readl(&clk->div_top1) >> bit_info->div_bit)
& bit_info->div_mask) + 1;
div = ((readl(&clk->div_top0) >> bit_info->prediv_bit)
& bit_info->prediv_mask) + 1;
return (sclk / sub_div) / div;
src = EXYNOS_SRC_MPLL;
div = readl(&clk->div_top0);
sub_div = readl(&clk->div_top1);
default: debug("%s: invalid peripheral %d", __func__, peripheral); return -1;break;
@@ -446,29 +444,26 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral) case EXYNOS_SRC_VPLL: sclk = exynos5_get_pll_clk(VPLL); break;
- default:
return 0;
Why remove? I think it's better to use default label and also how about add debug log?
Removing because anyways we are going to calculate & return 0 for non-existent src or sclk. I have initialized src and sclk above with value zero.
}
- /* Ratio clock division for this peripheral */
- if (bit_info->div_bit >= 0) {
sub_div = (div >> bit_info->div_bit) & bit_info->div_mask;
sub_clk = sclk / (sub_div + 1);
- }
- /* Clock divider ratio for this peripheral */
- if (bit_info->div_bit >= 0)
div = (div >> bit_info->div_bit) & bit_info->div_mask;
- if (bit_info->prediv_bit >= 0) {
div = (div >> bit_info->prediv_bit) & bit_info->prediv_mask;
return sub_clk / (div + 1);
- }
- /* Clock pre-divider ratio for this peripheral */
- if (bit_info->prediv_bit >= 0)
sub_div = (sub_div >> bit_info->prediv_bit)
& bit_info->prediv_mask;
- return sub_clk;
- /* Calculate and return required clock rate */
- return (sclk / (div + 1)) / (sub_div + 1);
}
static unsigned long exynos542x_get_periph_rate(int peripheral) { struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = get_clk_bit_info(peripheral);
- unsigned long sclk, sub_clk = 0;
- unsigned int src, div, sub_div = 0;
- unsigned long sclk = 0;
- unsigned int src = 0, div = 0, sub_div = 0; struct exynos5420_clock *clk = (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
@@ -516,10 +511,9 @@ static unsigned long exynos542x_get_periph_rate(int peripheral) case PERIPH_ID_I2C8: case PERIPH_ID_I2C9: case PERIPH_ID_I2C10:
sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
sub_div = ((readl(&clk->div_top1) >> bit_info->div_bit)
& bit_info->div_mask) + 1;
return sclk / sub_div;
src = EXYNOS542X_SRC_MPLL;
div = readl(&clk->div_top1);
default: debug("%s: invalid peripheral %d", __func__, peripheral); return -1;break;
@@ -541,23 +535,19 @@ static unsigned long exynos542x_get_periph_rate(int peripheral) case EXYNOS542X_SRC_RPLL: sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(RPLL); break;
- default:
return 0;
Ditto.
}
- /* Ratio clock division for this peripheral */
- if (bit_info->div_bit >= 0) {
- /* Clock divider ratio for this peripheral */
- if (bit_info->div_bit >= 0) div = (div >> bit_info->div_bit) & bit_info->div_mask;
sub_clk = sclk / (div + 1);
}
if (bit_info->prediv_bit >= 0) {
- /* Clock pre-divider ratio for this peripheral */
- if (bit_info->prediv_bit >= 0) sub_div = (sub_div >> bit_info->prediv_bit)
& bit_info->prediv_mask;
return sub_clk / (sub_div + 1);
- }
& bit_info->prediv_mask;
- return sub_clk;
- /* Calculate and return required clock rate */
- return (sclk / (div + 1)) / (sub_div + 1);
}
unsigned long clock_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
Thanks.
Regards, Akshay Saraswat

Hi,
On 02/04/2015 03:30 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote:
Hi,
Hi Akshay,
On 02/03/2015 05:27 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote:
Cleaning up soc_get_periph_rate to make the logic easy to comprehend.
Could you give more detailed description?
We did just a cleanup here by removing I2C sepecific calculations because we can now have a generic div and pre-div calculation. Only intention of doing it is making code clean and easily understandable. I don't know what else to write for that. Please suggest. :)
I mean you should write commit messages in detail about how is this more easier logic?
Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat akshay.s@samsung.com
Changes since v4:
- New patch.
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c index 3884d4b..8724bc7 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c @@ -366,8 +366,8 @@ static struct clk_bit_info *get_clk_bit_info(int peripheral) static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral) { struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = get_clk_bit_info(peripheral);
- unsigned long sclk, sub_clk = 0;
- unsigned int src, div, sub_div = 0;
- unsigned long sclk = 0;
- unsigned int src = 0, div = 0, sub_div = 0; struct exynos5_clock *clk = (struct exynos5_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
@@ -389,30 +389,30 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral) break; case PERIPH_ID_I2S0: src = readl(&clk->src_mau);
div = readl(&clk->div_mau);
case PERIPH_ID_SPI0: case PERIPH_ID_SPI1: src = readl(&clk->src_peric1);div = sub_div = readl(&clk->div_mau);
div = readl(&clk->div_peric1);
break; case PERIPH_ID_SPI2: src = readl(&clk->src_peric1);div = sub_div = readl(&clk->div_peric1);
div = readl(&clk->div_peric2);
break; case PERIPH_ID_SPI3: case PERIPH_ID_SPI4: src = readl(&clk->sclk_src_isp);div = sub_div = readl(&clk->div_peric2);
div = readl(&clk->sclk_div_isp);
break; case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0: case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1: src = readl(&clk->src_fsys);div = sub_div = readl(&clk->sclk_div_isp);
div = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
break; case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2: case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC3: src = readl(&clk->src_fsys);div = sub_div = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
div = readl(&clk->div_fsys2);
break; case PERIPH_ID_I2C0: case PERIPH_ID_I2C1:div = sub_div = readl(&clk->div_fsys2);
@@ -422,12 +422,10 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral) case PERIPH_ID_I2C5: case PERIPH_ID_I2C6: case PERIPH_ID_I2C7:
sclk = exynos5_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
sub_div = ((readl(&clk->div_top1) >> bit_info->div_bit)
& bit_info->div_mask) + 1;
div = ((readl(&clk->div_top0) >> bit_info->prediv_bit)
& bit_info->prediv_mask) + 1;
return (sclk / sub_div) / div;
src = EXYNOS_SRC_MPLL;
div = readl(&clk->div_top0);
sub_div = readl(&clk->div_top1);
default: debug("%s: invalid peripheral %d", __func__, peripheral); return -1;break;
@@ -446,29 +444,26 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral) case EXYNOS_SRC_VPLL: sclk = exynos5_get_pll_clk(VPLL); break;
- default:
return 0;
Why remove? I think it's better to use default label and also how about add debug log?
Removing because anyways we are going to calculate & return 0 for non-existent src or sclk. I have initialized src and sclk above with value zero.
I think it's good coding style to use default case, later we can detect wrong src cases when wrong any codes or read wrong values from register.
Thanks.
participants (2)
-
Akshay Saraswat
-
Joonyoung Shim