[U-Boot] [STATUS] u-boot-arm/master branch complete wrt merge window?
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
So apologies in advance to the sender, and please re-send me requests for any patch that should be in u-boot-arm/master at this point but is not.
Amicalement,
Hello Albert,
Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
So apologies in advance to the sender, and please re-send me requests for any patch that should be in u-boot-arm/master at this point but is not.
I miss the following patch:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/98531/
bye, Heiko
Le 12/08/2011 15:59, Heiko Schocher a écrit :
Hello Albert,
Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
So apologies in advance to the sender, and please re-send me requests for any patch that should be in u-boot-arm/master at this point but is not.
I miss the following patch:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/98531/
bye, Heiko
Done, thanks for the reminder.
Amicalement,
Hi Albert,
OMAP3 SPL - would be great: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/102112/focus=105261
Matter was discussed in this thread: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/103578
Haven't heard anything after sending in V9.
Regards Simon
On 08/12/2011 03:23 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
So apologies in advance to the sender, and please re-send me requests for any patch that should be in u-boot-arm/master at this point but is not.
Amicalement,
Hi Simon,
Le 12/08/2011 16:02, Simon Schwarz a écrit :
Hi Albert,
OMAP3 SPL - would be great: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/102112/focus=105261
Matter was discussed in this thread: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/103578
Haven't heard anything after sending in V9.
Regards Simon
Hmm, that's OMAP3, so I filed it away as going through Sandeep's tree.
Sandeep?
Amicalement,
Hi Albert,
On Friday 12 August 2011 06:53 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
Maybe, that was me. I had sent you a mail yesterday requesting to pull the following:
1. http://marc.info/?l=u-boot&m=131307370323792&w=2 2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/107678/ 3. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108865/
In addition, I have this series for consideration: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/105329 But this one was submitted after the merge window closed and is not that critical.
best regards, Aneesh
Hi Aneesh,
Le 12/08/2011 16:06, Aneesh V a écrit :
Hi Albert,
On Friday 12 August 2011 06:53 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
Maybe, that was me. I had sent you a mail yesterday requesting to pull the following:
Formally, of these four patches initially submitted on aug 1st, after the merge window close,
arm: do not force d-cache enable on all boards omap: enable caches at system start-up armv7: stronger barrier for cache-maintenance operations armv7: cache: remove flush on un-aligned invalidate
... the second is not a fix and shall be applied on next, then moved to master after the september release.
Those are fixes, so they'll go in.
In addition, I have this series for consideration: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/105329 But this one was submitted after the merge window closed and is not that critical.
Is
omap4: make SDRAM init work for ES1.0 silicon
to be considered a fix, and can it be applied alone? If yes to both questions, then I might take it in for master. The rest would go to next.
best regards, Aneesh
Thanks again!
Amicalement,
Le 12/08/2011 20:09, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
Hi Aneesh,
Le 12/08/2011 16:06, Aneesh V a écrit :
Hi Albert,
On Friday 12 August 2011 06:53 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
Maybe, that was me. I had sent you a mail yesterday requesting to pull the following:
Formally, of these four patches initially submitted on aug 1st, after the merge window close,
arm: do not force d-cache enable on all boards omap: enable caches at system start-up armv7: stronger barrier for cache-maintenance operations armv7: cache: remove flush on un-aligned invalidate... the second is not a fix and shall be applied on next, then moved to master after the september release.
Those are fixes, so they'll go in.
... but OMAP, so maybe through Sandeep's tree?
Amicalement,
Hi Sandeep,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.net wrote:
Le 12/08/2011 20:09, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
Hi Aneesh,
Le 12/08/2011 16:06, Aneesh V a écrit :
Hi Albert,
On Friday 12 August 2011 06:53 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
Maybe, that was me. I had sent you a mail yesterday requesting to pull the following:
Formally, of these four patches initially submitted on aug 1st, after the merge window close,
arm: do not force d-cache enable on all boards omap: enable caches at system start-up armv7: stronger barrier for cache-maintenance operations armv7: cache: remove flush on un-aligned invalidate
... the second is not a fix and shall be applied on next, then moved to master after the september release.
Those are fixes, so they'll go in.
... but OMAP, so maybe through Sandeep's tree?
Hope you are considering the above for pull + the SDRAM fix in:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/105329
omap4: make SDRAM init work for ES1.0 silicon
best regards, Aneesh
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 3:30 AM, V, Aneesh aneesh@ti.com wrote:
Hi Sandeep,
I don't know about everyone, but I like being put in the To: list when being called out to respond (or Cc: list when expected to notice), so I've added him.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.net wrote:
Le 12/08/2011 20:09, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
Hi Aneesh,
Le 12/08/2011 16:06, Aneesh V a écrit :
Hi Albert,
On Friday 12 August 2011 06:53 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
Maybe, that was me. I had sent you a mail yesterday requesting to pull the following:
Formally, of these four patches initially submitted on aug 1st, after the merge window close,
arm: do not force d-cache enable on all boards omap: enable caches at system start-up armv7: stronger barrier for cache-maintenance operations armv7: cache: remove flush on un-aligned invalidate
... the second is not a fix and shall be applied on next, then moved to master after the september release.
Those are fixes, so they'll go in.
... but OMAP, so maybe through Sandeep's tree?
Hope you are considering the above for pull + the SDRAM fix in:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/105329
omap4: make SDRAM init work for ES1.0 silicon
best regards, Aneesh _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi Albert,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.net wrote:
Hi Aneesh,
Le 12/08/2011 16:06, Aneesh V a écrit :
Hi Albert,
On Friday 12 August 2011 06:53 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
Maybe, that was me. I had sent you a mail yesterday requesting to pull the following:
Formally, of these four patches initially submitted on aug 1st, after the merge window close,
arm: do not force d-cache enable on all boards omap: enable caches at system start-up armv7: stronger barrier for cache-maintenance operations armv7: cache: remove flush on un-aligned invalidate
... the second is not a fix and shall be applied on next, then moved to master after the september release.
That'll end up in a regression for OMAP. Caches were enabled in OMAP without any issues. This series was done to save trouble for other boards. In the process OMAP will end up losing the cache support temporarily unless patch 2/4 is taken.
Those are fixes, so they'll go in.
In addition, I have this series for consideration: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/105329 But this one was submitted after the merge window closed and is not that critical.
Is
omap4: make SDRAM init work for ES1.0 silicon
to be considered a fix, and can it be applied alone? If yes to both questions, then I might take it in for master. The rest would go to next.
Yes, that's a bug fix and can be applied alone.
best regards, Aneesh
Hi Albert,
On Monday 15 August 2011 12:52 PM, V, Aneesh wrote:
Hi Albert,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.net wrote:
Hi Aneesh,
Le 12/08/2011 16:06, Aneesh V a écrit :
Hi Albert,
On Friday 12 August 2011 06:53 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
Maybe, that was me. I had sent you a mail yesterday requesting to pull the following:
Formally, of these four patches initially submitted on aug 1st, after the merge window close,
arm: do not force d-cache enable on all boards omap: enable caches at system start-up armv7: stronger barrier for cache-maintenance operations armv7: cache: remove flush on un-aligned invalidate
... the second is not a fix and shall be applied on next, then moved to master after the september release.
That'll end up in a regression for OMAP. Caches were enabled in OMAP without any issues. This series was done to save trouble for other boards. In the process OMAP will end up losing the cache support temporarily unless patch 2/4 is taken.
I have submitted a V4 for the first patch in this series that fixes a typo. I have also created a bundle in patchworks hoping that it may help you to pull the patches correctly.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/user/bundle/2072/
I have added patch 2/4 in this bundle(omap: enable caches at system start-up). Let me know if you would like to have it removed.
best regards, Aneesh
Albert,
On 08/12/2011 08:23 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
So apologies in advance to the sender, and please re-send me requests for any patch that should be in u-boot-arm/master at this point but is not.
Amicalement,
Will you apply patch for Calxeda Highbank platform support?
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108564/
Regards, Rob
participants (7)
-
Albert ARIBAUD -
Aneesh V -
Heiko Schocher -
Jason Kridner -
Rob Herring -
Simon Schwarz -
V, Aneesh