more pedantry ... as i was crawling through the env code, i noticed the common usage of "(ulong)&default_environment[0]" rather than what i thought was the more standard expression "(ulong)default_environment" to find the address of that array, so i did a quick grep:

$ grep -r "gd->env_addr.*default_environment" * board/freescale/ls1043ardb/ls1043ardb.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)&default_environment[0]; board/freescale/ls2080ardb/ls2080ardb.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)&default_environment[0]; board/freescale/ls2080a/ls2080a.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)&default_environment[0]; board/freescale/ls1043aqds/ls1043aqds.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)&default_environment[0]; board/freescale/ls2080aqds/ls2080aqds.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)&default_environment[0]; common/env_onenand.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)&default_environment[0]; common/env_sf.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)&default_environment[0]; common/env_dataflash.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)&default_environment[0]; common/env_nowhere.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)&default_environment[0]; common/env_nvram.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)&default_environment[0]; common/env_fat.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)&default_environment[0]; common/env_mmc.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)&default_environment[0]; common/env_flash.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)&default_environment[0]; common/env_remote.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)default_environment; <----- common/env_eeprom.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)&default_environment[0]; common/env_nand.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)&default_environment[0]; common/env_ubi.c: gd->env_addr = (ulong)&default_environment[0]; $

so everyone seems to be using one form of that calculation, except for that lonely expression in common/env_remote.c. :-( it all works, of course, it's just inconsistent.

rday