[PATCH] Revert "riscv: cpu: fu740: clear feature disable CSR"
This reverts commit bc8bbb77f74f21582b3bfd790334397757f88575.
This commit breaks U-Boot booting on SiFive Unleashed board, as there is no such CSR on U54 core.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com ---
arch/riscv/cpu/fu540/spl.c | 15 --------------- 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/cpu/fu540/spl.c b/arch/riscv/cpu/fu540/spl.c index 1740ef98b6..45657b7909 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/cpu/fu540/spl.c +++ b/arch/riscv/cpu/fu540/spl.c @@ -6,9 +6,6 @@
#include <dm.h> #include <log.h> -#include <asm/csr.h> - -#define CSR_U74_FEATURE_DISABLE 0x7c1
int spl_soc_init(void) { @@ -24,15 +21,3 @@ int spl_soc_init(void)
return 0; } - -void harts_early_init(void) -{ - /* - * Feature Disable CSR - * - * Clear feature disable CSR to '0' to turn on all features for - * each core. This operation must be in M-mode. - */ - if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(RISCV_MMODE)) - csr_write(CSR_U74_FEATURE_DISABLE, 0); -}
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 05:08:16PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
This reverts commit bc8bbb77f74f21582b3bfd790334397757f88575.
This commit breaks U-Boot booting on SiFive Unleashed board, as there is no such CSR on U54 core.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com
arch/riscv/cpu/fu540/spl.c | 15 --------------- 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/cpu/fu540/spl.c b/arch/riscv/cpu/fu540/spl.c index 1740ef98b6..45657b7909 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/cpu/fu540/spl.c +++ b/arch/riscv/cpu/fu540/spl.c @@ -6,9 +6,6 @@
#include <dm.h> #include <log.h> -#include <asm/csr.h>
-#define CSR_U74_FEATURE_DISABLE 0x7c1
int spl_soc_init(void) { @@ -24,15 +21,3 @@ int spl_soc_init(void)
return 0; }
-void harts_early_init(void) -{
- /*
* Feature Disable CSR** Clear feature disable CSR to '0' to turn on all features for* each core. This operation must be in M-mode.*/- if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(RISCV_MMODE))
csr_write(CSR_U74_FEATURE_DISABLE, 0);-}
2.25.1
Reviewed-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang ycliang@andestech.com
Hi Green,
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 5:08 PM Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
This reverts commit bc8bbb77f74f21582b3bfd790334397757f88575.
This commit breaks U-Boot booting on SiFive Unleashed board, as there is no such CSR on U54 core.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com
arch/riscv/cpu/fu540/spl.c | 15 --------------- 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
Please note you need to add the changes in the arch/riscv/cpu/fu740 directory.
Regards, Bin
Yes, noted. This patch should be applied based on the fu740 port. Thanks for the reminder.
- Green
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 9:01 PM Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Green,
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 5:08 PM Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
This reverts commit bc8bbb77f74f21582b3bfd790334397757f88575.
This commit breaks U-Boot booting on SiFive Unleashed board, as there is no such CSR on U54 core.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com
arch/riscv/cpu/fu540/spl.c | 15 --------------- 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
Please note you need to add the changes in the arch/riscv/cpu/fu740 directory.
Regards, Bin
Hi Green,
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:13 PM Green Wan green.wan@sifive.com wrote:
Yes, noted. This patch should be applied based on the fu740 port. Thanks for the reminder.
Just to clarify, the reverted patch *content* should be in your fu740 support series.
@Rick, this revert patch itself should be applied in u-boot/master now, as the mainline U-Boot does not boot on the Unleashed board.
Regards, Bin
Hi Bin,
Thanks, I'll include that revert. Just traced back the git log. My original patch is based on fu740. I guess it was merged to fu540 since fu740 series wasn't present yet.
Hi Rick,
Not sure whether you'll pick fu740 series soon or if any parts need more revisement. Do you prefer that I append both this revert and "disable CSR" patch to fu740&unmatched patch series? If so, I will create v9 patch and include these 2 patches.
Or if you prefer to keep them separate from fu740 series, we can wait for fu740&unmatche patch merge and I'll create a separate patch for this revert and CSR disable.
What do you think? Many thanks.
Regards, - Green
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:28 PM Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Green,
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:13 PM Green Wan green.wan@sifive.com wrote:
Yes, noted. This patch should be applied based on the fu740 port. Thanks
for the reminder.
Just to clarify, the reverted patch *content* should be in your fu740 support series.
@Rick, this revert patch itself should be applied in u-boot/master now, as the mainline U-Boot does not boot on the Unleashed board.
Regards, Bin
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:45 AM Green Wan green.wan@sifive.com wrote:
Hi Bin,
Thanks, I'll include that revert. Just traced back the git log. My original patch is based on fu740. I guess it was merged to fu540 since fu740 series wasn't present yet.
Hi Rick,
Not sure whether you'll pick fu740 series soon or if any parts need more revisement. Do you prefer that I append both this revert and "disable CSR" patch to fu740&unmatched patch series? If so, I will create v9 patch and include these 2 patches.
Or if you prefer to keep them separate from fu740 series, we can wait for fu740&unmatche patch merge and I'll create a separate patch for this revert and CSR disable.
What do you think? Many thanks.
There are multiple breakages in current u-boot/master for SiFive Unleashed board.
We'd better apply them as soon as possible.
Regards, Bin
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:45:30AM +0800, Green Wan wrote:
Hi Bin,
Thanks, I'll include that revert. Just traced back the git log. My original patch is based on fu740. I guess it was merged to fu540 since fu740 series wasn't present yet.
Hi Rick,
Not sure whether you'll pick fu740 series soon or if any parts need more revisement. Do you prefer that I append both this revert and "disable CSR" patch to fu740&unmatched patch series? If so, I will create v9 patch and include these 2 patches.
Or if you prefer to keep them separate from fu740 series, we can wait for fu740&unmatche patch merge and I'll create a separate patch for this revert and CSR disable.
What do you think? Many thanks.
Regards,
- Green
Hi Green,
Could you please append the "disable CSR" patch to fu740 unmatched patch and send a v9 patch ? Thanks!
Best regards, Leo
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:28 PM Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Green,
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:13 PM Green Wan green.wan@sifive.com wrote:
Yes, noted. This patch should be applied based on the fu740 port. Thanks
for the reminder.
Just to clarify, the reverted patch *content* should be in your fu740 support series.
@Rick, this revert patch itself should be applied in u-boot/master now, as the mainline U-Boot does not boot on the Unleashed board.
Regards, Bin
Hi Green,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:38 PM Leo Liang ycliang@andestech.com wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:45:30AM +0800, Green Wan wrote:
Hi Bin,
Thanks, I'll include that revert. Just traced back the git log. My original patch is based on fu740. I guess it was merged to fu540 since fu740 series wasn't present yet.
Hi Rick,
Not sure whether you'll pick fu740 series soon or if any parts need more revisement. Do you prefer that I append both this revert and "disable CSR" patch to fu740&unmatched patch series? If so, I will create v9 patch and include these 2 patches.
Or if you prefer to keep them separate from fu740 series, we can wait for fu740&unmatche patch merge and I'll create a separate patch for this revert and CSR disable.
What do you think? Many thanks.
Regards,
- Green
Hi Green,
Could you please append the "disable CSR" patch to fu740 unmatched patch and send a v9 patch ? Thanks!
I think you will need some update per this patch as well: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20210511120412.25065-1-bmeng...
Hi Leo,
What's your plan for the binman patch series?
If the binman patch series go first, Green needs to update Unmatched to use binman as well.
Regards, Bin
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Green,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:38 PM Leo Liang ycliang@andestech.com wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:45:30AM +0800, Green Wan wrote:
Hi Bin,
Thanks, I'll include that revert. Just traced back the git log. My
original
patch is based on fu740. I guess it was merged to fu540 since fu740
series
wasn't present yet.
Hi Rick,
Not sure whether you'll pick fu740 series soon or if any parts need
more
revisement. Do you prefer that I append both this revert and "disable
CSR"
patch to fu740&unmatched patch series? If so, I will create v9 patch
and
include these 2 patches.
Or if you prefer to keep them separate from fu740 series, we can wait
for
fu740&unmatche patch merge and I'll create a separate patch for this
revert
and CSR disable.
What do you think? Many thanks.
Regards,
- Green
Hi Green,
Could you please append the "disable CSR" patch to fu740 unmatched patch and send a v9 patch ? Thanks!
I think you will need some update per this patch as well:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20210511120412.25065-1-bmeng...
Hi Bin I updated the change to [patch v9 1/8]. Thanks,
Hi Leo,
What's your plan for the binman patch series?
If the binman patch series go first, Green needs to update Unmatched to use binman as well.
Hi Leo/Bin,
Are we referring to https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-May/448885.html? I'd prefer to have a separated patch work to track binman changes. Thanks,
Regards, - Green
Regards, Bin
Hi Green,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:43 PM Green Wan green.wan@sifive.com wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Green,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:38 PM Leo Liang ycliang@andestech.com wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:45:30AM +0800, Green Wan wrote:
Hi Bin,
Thanks, I'll include that revert. Just traced back the git log. My original patch is based on fu740. I guess it was merged to fu540 since fu740 series wasn't present yet.
Hi Rick,
Not sure whether you'll pick fu740 series soon or if any parts need more revisement. Do you prefer that I append both this revert and "disable CSR" patch to fu740&unmatched patch series? If so, I will create v9 patch and include these 2 patches.
Or if you prefer to keep them separate from fu740 series, we can wait for fu740&unmatche patch merge and I'll create a separate patch for this revert and CSR disable.
What do you think? Many thanks.
Regards,
- Green
Hi Green,
Could you please append the "disable CSR" patch to fu740 unmatched patch and send a v9 patch ? Thanks!
I think you will need some update per this patch as well: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20210511120412.25065-1-bmeng...
Hi Bin I updated the change to [patch v9 1/8]. Thanks,
Hi Leo,
What's your plan for the binman patch series?
If the binman patch series go first, Green needs to update Unmatched to use binman as well.
Hi Leo/Bin,
Are we referring to https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-May/448885.html?
This one: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=242992
I'd prefer to have a separated patch work to track binman changes. Thanks,
Actually that's why I asked Leo the plan. If your patch go before my patch, then I will need to do an additional patch to convert unmatched.
But if mine go first before yours, you will have to respin another version to do the convert in the first place.
Leo, please let us know your plan.
Regards, Bin
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 05:56:08PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
Hi Green,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:43 PM Green Wan green.wan@sifive.com wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Green,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:38 PM Leo Liang ycliang@andestech.com wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:45:30AM +0800, Green Wan wrote:
Hi Bin,
Thanks, I'll include that revert. Just traced back the git log. My original patch is based on fu740. I guess it was merged to fu540 since fu740 series wasn't present yet.
Hi Rick,
Not sure whether you'll pick fu740 series soon or if any parts need more revisement. Do you prefer that I append both this revert and "disable CSR" patch to fu740&unmatched patch series? If so, I will create v9 patch and include these 2 patches.
Or if you prefer to keep them separate from fu740 series, we can wait for fu740&unmatche patch merge and I'll create a separate patch for this revert and CSR disable.
What do you think? Many thanks.
Regards,
- Green
Hi Green,
Could you please append the "disable CSR" patch to fu740 unmatched patch and send a v9 patch ? Thanks!
I think you will need some update per this patch as well: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20210511120412.25065-1-bmeng...
Hi Bin I updated the change to [patch v9 1/8]. Thanks,
Hi Leo,
What's your plan for the binman patch series?
If the binman patch series go first, Green needs to update Unmatched to use binman as well.
Hi Leo/Bin,
Are we referring to https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-May/448885.html?
This one: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=242992
I'd prefer to have a separated patch work to track binman changes. Thanks,
Actually that's why I asked Leo the plan. If your patch go before my patch, then I will need to do an additional patch to convert unmatched.
But if mine go first before yours, you will have to respin another version to do the convert in the first place.
Leo, please let us know your plan.
Hi Bin/Green,
I was thinking picking Bin's patch first, because Green's patch could not pass CI. (Due to some format warning being treated as error when compiling drivers/pci/pcie_dw_common.c)
At the meantime, we should come up with some fixes to pass CI. Then Green could send his patch with binman, or a seperate patch to track binman utility.
What do you guys think?
Best regards, Leo
Regards, Bin
As I mentioned before, pcie_dw_common.c is not part of fu740 patch. The error is actually nothing to do with fu740 patchset. Even I fix those warning message. It will not be in same patch series.
- Green
Leo Liang ycliang@andestech.com於 2021年5月18日 週二，下午8:00寫道：
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 05:56:08PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
Hi Green,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:43 PM Green Wan green.wan@sifive.com wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Green,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:38 PM Leo Liang ycliang@andestech.com
wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:45:30AM +0800, Green Wan wrote:
Hi Bin,
Thanks, I'll include that revert. Just traced back the git log.
My original
patch is based on fu740. I guess it was merged to fu540 since
fu740 series
wasn't present yet.
Hi Rick,
Not sure whether you'll pick fu740 series soon or if any parts
need more
revisement. Do you prefer that I append both this revert and
"disable CSR"
patch to fu740&unmatched patch series? If so, I will create v9
patch and
include these 2 patches.
Or if you prefer to keep them separate from fu740 series, we can
wait for
fu740&unmatche patch merge and I'll create a separate patch for
this revert
and CSR disable.
What do you think? Many thanks.
Regards,
- Green
Hi Green,
Could you please append the "disable CSR" patch to fu740 unmatched
patch
and send a v9 patch ? Thanks!
I think you will need some update per this patch as well:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20210511120412.25065-1-bmeng...
Hi Bin I updated the change to [patch v9 1/8]. Thanks,
Hi Leo,
What's your plan for the binman patch series?
If the binman patch series go first, Green needs to update Unmatched to use binman as well.
Hi Leo/Bin,
Are we referring to
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-May/448885.html?
This one: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=242992
I'd prefer to have a separated patch work to track binman changes.
Thanks,
Actually that's why I asked Leo the plan. If your patch go before my patch, then I will need to do an additional patch to convert unmatched.
But if mine go first before yours, you will have to respin another version to do the convert in the first place.
Leo, please let us know your plan.
Hi Bin/Green,
I was thinking picking Bin's patch first, because Green's patch could not pass CI. (Due to some format warning being treated as error when compiling drivers/pci/pcie_dw_common.c)
At the meantime, we should come up with some fixes to pass CI. Then Green could send his patch with binman, or a seperate patch to track binman utility.
What do you guys think?
Best regards, Leo
Regards, Bin
Hi Leo,
I just posted the patch for pcie_dw_common.c compilation error. Please check and see if it works. Thanks.
Hi Bin and Leo,
And I'll check the 'binman' patch series soon. See if we can have both binman and fu740 patchset ready.
Regards, Green
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:12 PM Green Wan green.wan@sifive.com wrote:
As I mentioned before, pcie_dw_common.c is not part of fu740 patch. The error is actually nothing to do with fu740 patchset. Even I fix those warning message. It will not be in same patch series.
- Green
Leo Liang ycliang@andestech.com於 2021年5月18日 週二，下午8:00寫道：
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 05:56:08PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
Hi Green,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:43 PM Green Wan green.wan@sifive.com wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Green,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:38 PM Leo Liang ycliang@andestech.com
wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:45:30AM +0800, Green Wan wrote: > Hi Bin, > > Thanks, I'll include that revert. Just traced back the git log.
My original
> patch is based on fu740. I guess it was merged to fu540 since
fu740 series
> wasn't present yet. > > Hi Rick, > > Not sure whether you'll pick fu740 series soon or if any parts
need more
> revisement. Do you prefer that I append both this revert and
"disable CSR"
> patch to fu740&unmatched patch series? If so, I will create v9
patch and
> include these 2 patches. > > Or if you prefer to keep them separate from fu740 series, we can
wait for
> fu740&unmatche patch merge and I'll create a separate patch for
this revert
> and CSR disable. > > What do you think? Many thanks. > > Regards, > - Green >
Hi Green,
Could you please append the "disable CSR" patch to fu740 unmatched
patch
and send a v9 patch ? Thanks!
I think you will need some update per this patch as well:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20210511120412.25065-1-bmeng...
Hi Bin I updated the change to [patch v9 1/8]. Thanks,
Hi Leo,
What's your plan for the binman patch series?
If the binman patch series go first, Green needs to update Unmatched to use binman as well.
Hi Leo/Bin,
Are we referring to
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-May/448885.html?
This one: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=242992
I'd prefer to have a separated patch work to track binman changes.
Thanks,
Actually that's why I asked Leo the plan. If your patch go before my patch, then I will need to do an additional patch to convert unmatched.
But if mine go first before yours, you will have to respin another version to do the convert in the first place.
Leo, please let us know your plan.
Hi Bin/Green,
I was thinking picking Bin's patch first, because Green's patch could not pass CI. (Due to some format warning being treated as error when compiling drivers/pci/pcie_dw_common.c)
At the meantime, we should come up with some fixes to pass CI. Then Green could send his patch with binman, or a seperate patch to track binman utility.
What do you guys think?
Best regards, Leo
Regards, Bin
Hi Leo and Bin,
I have the 'binman' patch for unmatched ready. So, we can pick up the 'binman' series first.
I plan to create a v10 patchset that includes the fu740 series on top of 'binman' patch and 'split CLINT' patchset and appends 'clear feature disable CSRs' and 'binman change for unmatched'. But I keep the pcie_dw_common.c compilation fixes in the separated patch. (already posted)
What do you think of it? If there is no further revisement needed, I can do the patch.
Many thanks, - Green
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:35 PM Green Wan green.wan@sifive.com wrote:
Hi Leo,
I just posted the patch for pcie_dw_common.c compilation error. Please check and see if it works. Thanks.
Hi Bin and Leo,
And I'll check the 'binman' patch series soon. See if we can have both binman and fu740 patchset ready.
Regards, Green
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:12 PM Green Wan green.wan@sifive.com wrote:
As I mentioned before, pcie_dw_common.c is not part of fu740 patch. The error is actually nothing to do with fu740 patchset. Even I fix those warning message. It will not be in same patch series.
- Green
Leo Liang ycliang@andestech.com於 2021年5月18日 週二，下午8:00寫道：
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 05:56:08PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
Hi Green,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:43 PM Green Wan green.wan@sifive.com
wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Green,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:38 PM Leo Liang ycliang@andestech.com
wrote:
> > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:45:30AM +0800, Green Wan wrote: > > Hi Bin, > > > > Thanks, I'll include that revert. Just traced back the git log.
My original
> > patch is based on fu740. I guess it was merged to fu540 since
fu740 series
> > wasn't present yet. > > > > Hi Rick, > > > > Not sure whether you'll pick fu740 series soon or if any parts
need more
> > revisement. Do you prefer that I append both this revert and
"disable CSR"
> > patch to fu740&unmatched patch series? If so, I will create v9
patch and
> > include these 2 patches. > > > > Or if you prefer to keep them separate from fu740 series, we
can wait for
> > fu740&unmatche patch merge and I'll create a separate patch for
this revert
> > and CSR disable. > > > > What do you think? Many thanks. > > > > Regards, > > - Green > > > > Hi Green, > > Could you please append the "disable CSR" patch to fu740
unmatched patch
> and send a v9 patch ? Thanks! >
I think you will need some update per this patch as well:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20210511120412.25065-1-bmeng...
Hi Bin I updated the change to [patch v9 1/8]. Thanks,
Hi Leo,
What's your plan for the binman patch series?
If the binman patch series go first, Green needs to update Unmatched to use binman as well.
Hi Leo/Bin,
Are we referring to
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-May/448885.html?
This one:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=242992
I'd prefer to have a separated patch work to track binman changes.
Thanks,
Actually that's why I asked Leo the plan. If your patch go before my patch, then I will need to do an additional patch to convert unmatched.
But if mine go first before yours, you will have to respin another version to do the convert in the first place.
Leo, please let us know your plan.
Hi Bin/Green,
I was thinking picking Bin's patch first, because Green's patch could not pass CI. (Due to some format warning being treated as error when compiling drivers/pci/pcie_dw_common.c)
At the meantime, we should come up with some fixes to pass CI. Then Green could send his patch with binman, or a seperate patch to track binman utility.
What do you guys think?
Best regards, Leo
Regards, Bin
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 03:52:39PM +0800, Green Wan wrote:
Hi Green,
Hi Leo and Bin,
I have the 'binman' patch for unmatched ready. So, we can pick up the 'binman' series first.
I plan to create a v10 patchset that includes the fu740 series on top of 'binman' patch and 'split CLINT' patchset and appends 'clear feature disable CSRs' and 'binman change for unmatched'. But I keep the pcie_dw_common.c compilation fixes in the separated patch. (already posted)
What do you think of it? If there is no further revisement needed, I can do the patch.
Many thanks,
- Green
Hi Green,
Unfortunately, the patch for compilation fixes still does not work. CI result: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-riscv/-/pipelines/7580
But other than that, sounds good to me. Thanks!
Best regards, Leo
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:35 PM Green Wan <green.wan@sifive.com> wrote:
Hi Leo,
I just posted the patch for pcie_dw_common.c compilation error. Please check and see if it works. Thanks.
Hi Bin and Leo,
And I'll check the 'binman' patch series soon. See if we can have both binman and fu740 patchset ready.
Regards, Green
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:12 PM Green Wan <green.wan@sifive.com> wrote:
As I mentioned before, pcie_dw_common.c is not part of fu740 patch. The error is actually nothing to do with fu740 patchset. Even I fix those warning message. It will not be in same patch series.
- Green
Leo Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>於 2021年5月18日 週二，下午8:00寫道：
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 05:56:08PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
Hi Green,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:43 PM Green Wan <green.wan@sifive.com> wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Green,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:38 PM Leo Liang <ycliang@andestech.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:45:30AM +0800, Green Wan wrote:
Hi Bin,
Thanks, I'll include that revert. Just traced back the git log. My original patch is based on fu740. I guess it was merged to fu540 since fu740 series wasn't present yet.
Hi Rick,
Not sure whether you'll pick fu740 series soon or if any parts need more revisement. Do you prefer that I append both this revert and "disable CSR" patch to fu740&unmatched patch series? If so, I will create v9 patch and include these 2 patches.
Or if you prefer to keep them separate from fu740 series, we can wait for fu740&unmatche patch merge and I'll create a separate patch for this revert and CSR disable.
What do you think? Many thanks.
Regards,
- Green
Hi Green,
Could you please append the "disable CSR" patch to fu740 unmatched patch and send a v9 patch ? Thanks!
I think you will need some update per this patch as well:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20210511120412.25065-1-bmeng...
Hi Bin I updated the change to [patch v9 1/8]. Thanks,
Hi Leo,
What's your plan for the binman patch series?
If the binman patch series go first, Green needs to update Unmatched to use binman as well.
Hi Leo/Bin,
Are we referring to
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-May/448885.html?
This one:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=242992
I'd prefer to have a separated patch work to track binman changes. Thanks,
Actually that's why I asked Leo the plan. If your patch go before my patch, then I will need to do an additional patch to convert unmatched.
But if mine go first before yours, you will have to respin another version to do the convert in the first place.
Leo, please let us know your plan.
Hi Bin/Green,
I was thinking picking Bin's patch first, because Green's patch could not pass CI. (Due to some format warning being treated as error when compiling drivers/pci/pcie_dw_common.c)
At the meantime, we should come up with some fixes to pass CI. Then Green could send his patch with binman, or a seperate patch to track binman utility.
What do you guys think?
Best regards, Leo
Regards, Bin
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 4:58 PM Leo Liang ycliang@andestech.com wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 03:52:39PM +0800, Green Wan wrote:
Hi Green,
Hi Leo and Bin,
I have the 'binman' patch for unmatched ready. So, we can pick up the
'binman' series first.
I plan to create a v10 patchset that includes the fu740 series on top of
'binman' patch and 'split CLINT' patchset and appends 'clear feature disable CSRs' and 'binman change for unmatched'. But I keep the pcie_dw_common.c compilation fixes in the separated
patch. (already posted)
What do you think of it? If there is no further revisement needed,
I can do the patch.
Many thanks,
- Green
Hi Green,
Unfortunately, the patch for compilation fixes still does not work. CI result: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-riscv/-/pipelines/7580
I might know what causes the difference. Some platforms in the CI use
'u64' as "pci_addr_t" and "pci_size_t" and others use 'unsigned long'. (check include/pci.h)
I will simply cast all variables to the bigger length to avoid compilation warning. will post the patch later.
But other than that, sounds good to me. Thanks!
will create the patchset. Thanks.
Best regards, Leo
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:35 PM Green Wan <green.wan@sifive.com>
wrote:
Hi Leo,
I just posted the patch for pcie_dw_common.c compilation error. Please
check and see if it works. Thanks.
Hi Bin and Leo,
And I'll check the 'binman' patch series soon. See if we can have both
binman and fu740 patchset ready.
Regards, Green
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:12 PM Green Wan <green.wan@sifive.com>
wrote:
As I mentioned before, pcie_dw_common.c is not part of fu740 patch. The
error is actually nothing to do with fu740 patchset. Even I fix those warning message. It will not be in same patch series.
- Green
Leo Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>於 2021年5月18日 週二，下午8:00寫道：
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 05:56:08PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
Hi Green,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:43 PM Green Wan <green.wan@sifive.com>
wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Green,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:38 PM Leo Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>
wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:45:30AM +0800, Green Wan wrote: > Hi Bin, > > Thanks, I'll include that revert. Just traced back the git log.
My original
> patch is based on fu740. I guess it was merged to fu540 since
fu740 series
> wasn't present yet. > > Hi Rick, > > Not sure whether you'll pick fu740 series soon or if any parts
need more
> revisement. Do you prefer that I append both this revert and
"disable CSR"
> patch to fu740&unmatched patch series? If so, I will create
v9 patch and
> include these 2 patches. > > Or if you prefer to keep them separate from fu740 series, we
can wait for
> fu740&unmatche patch merge and I'll create a separate patch
for this revert
> and CSR disable. > > What do you think? Many thanks. > > Regards, > - Green >
Hi Green,
Could you please append the "disable CSR" patch to
fu740 unmatched patch
and send a v9 patch ? Thanks!
I think you will need some update per this patch as well:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20210511120412.25065-1-bmeng...
Hi Bin I updated the change to [patch v9 1/8]. Thanks,
Hi Leo,
What's your plan for the binman patch series?
If the binman patch series go first, Green needs to update Unmatched to use binman as well.
Hi Leo/Bin,
Are we referring to
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-May/448885.html?
This one:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=242992
I'd prefer to have a separated patch work to track binman changes.
Thanks,
Actually that's why I asked Leo the plan. If your patch go before my patch, then I will need to do an additional patch to convert unmatched.
But if mine go first before yours, you will have to respin another version to do the convert in the first place.
Leo, please let us know your plan.
Hi Bin/Green,
I was thinking picking Bin's patch first, because Green's patch could not pass CI. (Due to some format warning being treated as error when compiling drivers/pci/pcie_dw_common.c)
At the meantime, we should come up with some fixes to pass CI. Then Green could send his patch with binman, or a seperate patch to track binman utility.
What do you guys think?
Best regards, Leo
Regards, Bin
Hi Green,
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 3:52 PM Green Wan green.wan@sifive.com wrote:
Hi Leo and Bin,
I have the 'binman' patch for unmatched ready. So, we can pick up the 'binman' series first.
I plan to create a v10 patchset that includes the fu740 series on top of 'binman' patch and 'split CLINT' patchset and appends 'clear feature disable CSRs' and 'binman change for unmatched'. But I keep the pcie_dw_common.c compilation fixes in the separated patch. (already posted)
Sounds good to me. Thanks!
What do you think of it? If there is no further revisement needed, I can do the patch.
Regards, Bin
Leo Liang ycliang@andestech.com於 2021年5月18日 週二，下午3:38寫道：
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:45:30AM +0800, Green Wan wrote:
Hi Bin,
Thanks, I'll include that revert. Just traced back the git log. My
original
patch is based on fu740. I guess it was merged to fu540 since fu740
series
wasn't present yet.
Hi Rick,
Not sure whether you'll pick fu740 series soon or if any parts need more revisement. Do you prefer that I append both this revert and "disable
CSR"
patch to fu740&unmatched patch series? If so, I will create v9 patch and include these 2 patches.
Or if you prefer to keep them separate from fu740 series, we can wait for fu740&unmatche patch merge and I'll create a separate patch for this
revert
and CSR disable.
What do you think? Many thanks.
Regards,
- Green
Hi Green,
Could you please append the "disable CSR" patch to fu740 unmatched patch and send a v9 patch ? Thanks!
Best regards, Leo
Sure, I think I can do it by today.
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:28 PM Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Green,
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:13 PM Green Wan green.wan@sifive.com
wrote:
Yes, noted. This patch should be applied based on the fu740 port.
Thanks
for the reminder.
Just to clarify, the reverted patch *content* should be in your fu740 support series.
@Rick, this revert patch itself should be applied in u-boot/master now, as the mainline U-Boot does not boot on the Unleashed board.
Regards, Bin
participants (3)
-
Bin Meng -
Green Wan -
Leo Liang