[U-Boot] [PATCH] net: e1000: Allow to use e1000 SPI command with DM

Fix compile errors when enabling CONFIG_DM_ETH, CONFIG_CMD_E1000 and CONFIG_E1000_SPI.
Signed-off-by: Yaroslav K. yar444@gmail.com --- drivers/net/e1000.c | 6 ++++- drivers/net/e1000_spi.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000.c b/drivers/net/e1000.c index 196989b..09d6870 100644 --- a/drivers/net/e1000.c +++ b/drivers/net/e1000.c @@ -5513,7 +5513,8 @@ static int do_e1000(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, struct udevice *dev; char name[30]; int ret; -#else +#endif +#if !defined(CONFIG_DM_ETH) || defined(CONFIG_E1000_SPI) struct e1000_hw *hw; #endif int cardnum; @@ -5532,6 +5533,9 @@ static int do_e1000(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, plat = dev_get_platdata(dev); mac = plat->enetaddr; } +#ifdef CONFIG_E1000_SPI + hw = dev_get_priv(dev); +#endif #else hw = e1000_find_card(cardnum); if (hw) diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000_spi.c b/drivers/net/e1000_spi.c index 576ddb8..78f4f15 100644 --- a/drivers/net/e1000_spi.c +++ b/drivers/net/e1000_spi.c @@ -94,29 +94,29 @@ struct spi_slave *spi_setup_slave(unsigned int bus, unsigned int cs,
/* Make sure it has an SPI chip */ if (hw->eeprom.type != e1000_eeprom_spi) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "No attached SPI EEPROM found!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "No attached SPI EEPROM found!\n"); return NULL; }
/* Argument sanity checks */ if (cs != 0) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "No such SPI chip: %u\n", cs); + E1000_ERR(hw, "No such SPI chip: %u\n", cs); return NULL; } if (mode != SPI_MODE_0) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "Only SPI MODE-0 is supported!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "Only SPI MODE-0 is supported!\n"); return NULL; }
/* TODO: Use max_hz somehow */ - E1000_DBG(hw->nic, "EEPROM SPI access requested\n"); + E1000_DBG(hw, "EEPROM SPI access requested\n"); return &hw->spi; }
void spi_free_slave(struct spi_slave *spi) { __maybe_unused struct e1000_hw *hw = e1000_hw_from_spi(spi); - E1000_DBG(hw->nic, "EEPROM SPI access released\n"); + E1000_DBG(hw, "EEPROM SPI access released\n"); }
int spi_claim_bus(struct spi_slave *spi) @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ int spi_claim_bus(struct spi_slave *spi) struct e1000_hw *hw = e1000_hw_from_spi(spi);
if (e1000_acquire_eeprom(hw)) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "EEPROM SPI cannot be acquired!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "EEPROM SPI cannot be acquired!\n"); return -1; }
@@ -342,41 +342,41 @@ static int do_e1000_spi_show(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, struct e1000_hw *hw,
/* Extra sanity checks */ if (!length) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "Requested zero-sized dump!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "Requested zero-sized dump!\n"); return 1; } if ((0x10000 < length) || (0x10000 - length < offset)) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "Can't dump past 0xFFFF!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "Can't dump past 0xFFFF!\n"); return 1; }
/* Allocate a buffer to hold stuff */ buffer = malloc(length); if (!buffer) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "Out of Memory!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "Out of Memory!\n"); return 1; }
/* Acquire the EEPROM and perform the dump */ if (e1000_acquire_eeprom(hw)) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "EEPROM SPI cannot be acquired!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "EEPROM SPI cannot be acquired!\n"); free(buffer); return 1; } err = e1000_spi_eeprom_dump(hw, buffer, offset, length, true); e1000_release_eeprom(hw); if (err) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "Interrupted!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "Interrupted!\n"); free(buffer); return 1; }
/* Now hexdump the result */ printf("%s: ===== Intel e1000 EEPROM (0x%04hX - 0x%04hX) =====", - hw->nic->name, offset, offset + length - 1); + hw->name, offset, offset + length - 1); for (i = 0; i < length; i++) { if ((i & 0xF) == 0) - printf("\n%s: %04hX: ", hw->nic->name, offset + i); + printf("\n%s: %04hX: ", hw->name, offset + i); else if ((i & 0xF) == 0x8) printf(" "); printf(" %02hx", buffer[i]); @@ -407,29 +407,29 @@ static int do_e1000_spi_dump(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, struct e1000_hw *hw,
/* Extra sanity checks */ if (!length) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "Requested zero-sized dump!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "Requested zero-sized dump!\n"); return 1; } if ((0x10000 < length) || (0x10000 - length < offset)) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "Can't dump past 0xFFFF!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "Can't dump past 0xFFFF!\n"); return 1; }
/* Acquire the EEPROM */ if (e1000_acquire_eeprom(hw)) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "EEPROM SPI cannot be acquired!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "EEPROM SPI cannot be acquired!\n"); return 1; }
/* Perform the programming operation */ if (e1000_spi_eeprom_dump(hw, dest, offset, length, true) < 0) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "Interrupted!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "Interrupted!\n"); e1000_release_eeprom(hw); return 1; }
e1000_release_eeprom(hw); - printf("%s: ===== EEPROM DUMP COMPLETE =====\n", hw->nic->name); + printf("%s: ===== EEPROM DUMP COMPLETE =====\n", hw->name); return 0; }
@@ -452,19 +452,19 @@ static int do_e1000_spi_program(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, struct e1000_hw *hw,
/* Acquire the EEPROM */ if (e1000_acquire_eeprom(hw)) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "EEPROM SPI cannot be acquired!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "EEPROM SPI cannot be acquired!\n"); return 1; }
/* Perform the programming operation */ if (e1000_spi_eeprom_program(hw, source, offset, length, true) < 0) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "Interrupted!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "Interrupted!\n"); e1000_release_eeprom(hw); return 1; }
e1000_release_eeprom(hw); - printf("%s: ===== EEPROM PROGRAMMED =====\n", hw->nic->name); + printf("%s: ===== EEPROM PROGRAMMED =====\n", hw->name); return 0; }
@@ -488,19 +488,19 @@ static int do_e1000_spi_checksum(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, struct e1000_hw *hw, length = sizeof(uint16_t) * (EEPROM_CHECKSUM_REG + 1); buffer = malloc(length); if (!buffer) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "Unable to allocate EEPROM buffer!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "Unable to allocate EEPROM buffer!\n"); return 1; }
/* Acquire the EEPROM */ if (e1000_acquire_eeprom(hw)) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "EEPROM SPI cannot be acquired!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "EEPROM SPI cannot be acquired!\n"); return 1; }
/* Read the EEPROM */ if (e1000_spi_eeprom_dump(hw, buffer, 0, length, true) < 0) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "Interrupted!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "Interrupted!\n"); e1000_release_eeprom(hw); return 1; } @@ -514,14 +514,14 @@ static int do_e1000_spi_checksum(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, struct e1000_hw *hw, /* Verify it! */ if (checksum_reg == checksum) { printf("%s: INFO: EEPROM checksum is correct! (0x%04hx)\n", - hw->nic->name, checksum); + hw->name, checksum); e1000_release_eeprom(hw); return 0; }
/* Hrm, verification failed, print an error */ - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "EEPROM checksum is incorrect!\n"); - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, " ...register was 0x%04hx, calculated 0x%04hx\n", + E1000_ERR(hw, "EEPROM checksum is incorrect!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, " ...register was 0x%04hx, calculated 0x%04hx\n", checksum_reg, checksum);
/* If they didn't ask us to update it, just return an error */ @@ -531,11 +531,11 @@ static int do_e1000_spi_checksum(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, struct e1000_hw *hw, }
/* Ok, correct it! */ - printf("%s: Reprogramming the EEPROM checksum...\n", hw->nic->name); + printf("%s: Reprogramming the EEPROM checksum...\n", hw->name); buffer[i] = cpu_to_le16(checksum); if (e1000_spi_eeprom_program(hw, &buffer[i], i * sizeof(uint16_t), sizeof(uint16_t), true)) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "Interrupted!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "Interrupted!\n"); e1000_release_eeprom(hw); return 1; } @@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ int do_e1000_spi(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, struct e1000_hw *hw,
/* Make sure it has an SPI chip */ if (hw->eeprom.type != e1000_eeprom_spi) { - E1000_ERR(hw->nic, "No attached SPI EEPROM found!\n"); + E1000_ERR(hw, "No attached SPI EEPROM found!\n"); return 1; }

On 2 August 2016 at 20:42, Yaroslav K. yar444@gmail.com wrote:
Fix compile errors when enabling CONFIG_DM_ETH, CONFIG_CMD_E1000 and CONFIG_E1000_SPI.
Signed-off-by: Yaroslav K. yar444@gmail.com
drivers/net/e1000.c | 6 ++++- drivers/net/e1000_spi.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Yaroslav K. yar444@gmail.com wrote:
Fix compile errors when enabling CONFIG_DM_ETH, CONFIG_CMD_E1000 and CONFIG_E1000_SPI.
Signed-off-by: Yaroslav K. yar444@gmail.com
Something about this patch email is malformed and not parsed by patchwork properly.
Another patch with the same intent was also sent just after this one: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/655311/
With permission of you and Alban Bedel I'll add both of your SOB to Alban's patch.
Cheers, -Joe

On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 11:39:49 -0500 Joe Hershberger joe.hershberger@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Yaroslav K. yar444@gmail.com wrote:
Fix compile errors when enabling CONFIG_DM_ETH, CONFIG_CMD_E1000 and CONFIG_E1000_SPI.
Signed-off-by: Yaroslav K. yar444@gmail.com
Something about this patch email is malformed and not parsed by patchwork properly.
Another patch with the same intent was also sent just after this one: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/655311/
With permission of you and Alban Bedel I'll add both of your SOB to Alban's patch.
Please do.
Alban

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Yaroslav K. yar444@gmail.com wrote:
Fix compile errors when enabling CONFIG_DM_ETH, CONFIG_CMD_E1000 and CONFIG_E1000_SPI.
Signed-off-by: Yaroslav K. yar444@gmail.com
In the future please Cc me when sending network patches. scripts/patman/patman can help you with this.
Also, please do not abbreviate your name in your SOB line.
Thanks, -Joe
participants (4)
-
Alban Bedel
-
Joe Hershberger
-
Simon Glass
-
Yaroslav K.