-----Original Message----- From: Peter Pearse [mailto:peter.pearse@arm.com] Sent: 17 April 2008 15:25 To: 'Dirk Behme' Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] [GIT PULL] Please pull u-boot-arm

...

-----Original Message----- From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.behme@googlemail.com] Sent: 17 April 2008 15:22 To: Peter Pearse Cc: wd@denx.de; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [GIT PULL] Please pull u-boot-arm

Peter Pearse wrote:

...

...

-----Original Message----- From: wd@denx.de [mailto:wd@denx.de] Sent: 11 April 2008 14:18 To: Peter Pearse Cc: 'Guennadi Liakhovetski'; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [GIT PULL] Please pull u-boot-arm

In message 000301c89bd0$21749350$3a4d010a@Emea.Arm.com

you wrote:

...

...

...

...

...

Actually, I think, even Peter should not reset his tree,

but revert

...

...

just as well as you are going to do it: his tree is publically accessible too, and if he resets his tree, it will become

unclear,

...

...

where respective commits from the central tree come from.

Agreed.

I shall revert u-boot-arm commits in the order listed.

OK, I reverted the commits in the master branch now.

And I've reverted u-boot-arm

What's the status of re-applying the reverted patches?

I really like to see

[PATCH v2] ARM: Davinci: Fix DM644x timer overflow handling and cleanup

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/38505

in mainline.

Sorry if I missed anything,

Dirk Sorry, I'm still sorting my mail system.

Perhaps another ARM guardian could pick it up. Regards

Peter

...

Dirk