[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] DW SPI: Allow to overload the management of the external CS
On some platforms, as the Ocelot ones, when wanting to control the CS through software, it is not possible to do it through the GPIO controller. Indeed, this signal is managed through a dedicated range of registers inside the SoC..
By declaring the external_cs_manage function as weak, it is possible to manage the CS at platform level and then using the appropriate registers.
Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT gregory.clement@bootlin.com --- Changelog: v1 -> v2 - Fix ocelot name
drivers/spi/designware_spi.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/designware_spi.c b/drivers/spi/designware_spi.c index d8b73ea326..1f47ea24c8 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/designware_spi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/designware_spi.c @@ -334,7 +334,13 @@ static int poll_transfer(struct dw_spi_priv *priv) return 0; }
-static void external_cs_manage(struct udevice *dev, bool on) +/* + * We define external_cs_manage function as 'weak' as some targets + * (like MSCC Ocelot) don't control the external CS pin using a GPIO + * controller. These SoCs use specific registers to control by + * software the SPI pins (and especially the CS). + */ +__weak void external_cs_manage(struct udevice *dev, bool on) { #if defined(CONFIG_DM_GPIO) && !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) struct dw_spi_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev->parent);
Hi Jagan,
On mar., oct. 09 2018, Gregory CLEMENT gregory.clement@bootlin.com wrote:
On some platforms, as the Ocelot ones, when wanting to control the CS through software, it is not possible to do it through the GPIO controller. Indeed, this signal is managed through a dedicated range of registers inside the SoC..
By declaring the external_cs_manage function as weak, it is possible to manage the CS at platform level and then using the appropriate registers.
I sent this v2 nearly 2 months ago and didn't have any objection about it. So, Could you merge this patch please?
Thanks!
Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT gregory.clement@bootlin.com
Changelog: v1 -> v2
- Fix ocelot name
drivers/spi/designware_spi.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/designware_spi.c b/drivers/spi/designware_spi.c index d8b73ea326..1f47ea24c8 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/designware_spi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/designware_spi.c @@ -334,7 +334,13 @@ static int poll_transfer(struct dw_spi_priv *priv) return 0; }
-static void external_cs_manage(struct udevice *dev, bool on) +/*
- We define external_cs_manage function as 'weak' as some targets
- (like MSCC Ocelot) don't control the external CS pin using a GPIO
- controller. These SoCs use specific registers to control by
- software the SPI pins (and especially the CS).
- */
+__weak void external_cs_manage(struct udevice *dev, bool on) { #if defined(CONFIG_DM_GPIO) && !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) struct dw_spi_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev->parent); -- 2.19.1
participants (1)
-
Gregory CLEMENT