[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] core: ofnode: Fix ofnode_get_addr_size_index function

Currently the else part of ofnode_get_addr_size_index function does not fetch addresses based on the index but rather just returns the base address. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com --- drivers/core/ofnode.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/core/ofnode.c b/drivers/core/ofnode.c index b7b7ad3..c80e1cb 100644 --- a/drivers/core/ofnode.c +++ b/drivers/core/ofnode.c @@ -253,12 +253,12 @@ int ofnode_read_size(ofnode node, const char *propname)
fdt_addr_t ofnode_get_addr_index(ofnode node, int index) { + int na, ns; + u64 size; + if (ofnode_is_np(node)) { const __be32 *prop_val; uint flags; - u64 size; - int na; - int ns;
prop_val = of_get_address(ofnode_to_np(node), index, &size, &flags); @@ -274,8 +274,11 @@ fdt_addr_t ofnode_get_addr_index(ofnode node, int index) return of_read_number(prop_val, na); } } else { - return fdt_get_base_address(gd->fdt_blob, - ofnode_to_offset(node)); + na = ofnode_read_simple_addr_cells(ofnode_get_parent(node)); + ns = ofnode_read_simple_size_cells(ofnode_get_parent(node)); + return fdtdec_get_addr_size_fixed(gd->fdt_blob, + ofnode_to_offset(node), "reg", + index, na, ns, &size, true); }
return FDT_ADDR_T_NONE;

Add ofnode_get_addr_size_index function to fetch the address and size of the reg space based on index.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com --- drivers/core/ofnode.c | 14 ++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/core/ofnode.c b/drivers/core/ofnode.c index c80e1cb..b98b0b9 100644 --- a/drivers/core/ofnode.c +++ b/drivers/core/ofnode.c @@ -251,16 +251,15 @@ int ofnode_read_size(ofnode node, const char *propname) return -EINVAL; }
-fdt_addr_t ofnode_get_addr_index(ofnode node, int index) +fdt_addr_t ofnode_get_addr_size_index(ofnode node, int index, u64 *size) { int na, ns; - u64 size;
if (ofnode_is_np(node)) { const __be32 *prop_val; uint flags;
- prop_val = of_get_address(ofnode_to_np(node), index, &size, + prop_val = of_get_address(ofnode_to_np(node), index, size, &flags); if (!prop_val) return FDT_ADDR_T_NONE; @@ -278,12 +277,19 @@ fdt_addr_t ofnode_get_addr_index(ofnode node, int index) ns = ofnode_read_simple_size_cells(ofnode_get_parent(node)); return fdtdec_get_addr_size_fixed(gd->fdt_blob, ofnode_to_offset(node), "reg", - index, na, ns, &size, true); + index, na, ns, size, true); }
return FDT_ADDR_T_NONE; }
+fdt_addr_t ofnode_get_addr_index(ofnode node, int index) +{ + u64 size; + + return ofnode_get_addr_size_index(node, index, &size); +} + fdt_addr_t ofnode_get_addr(ofnode node) { return ofnode_get_addr_index(node, 0);

On Monday 05 November 2018 11:17 AM, Keerthy wrote:
Add ofnode_get_addr_size_index function to fetch the address and size of the reg space based on index.
I missed the header file hunk. I will send v2 in a bit.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com
drivers/core/ofnode.c | 14 ++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/core/ofnode.c b/drivers/core/ofnode.c index c80e1cb..b98b0b9 100644 --- a/drivers/core/ofnode.c +++ b/drivers/core/ofnode.c @@ -251,16 +251,15 @@ int ofnode_read_size(ofnode node, const char *propname) return -EINVAL; }
-fdt_addr_t ofnode_get_addr_index(ofnode node, int index) +fdt_addr_t ofnode_get_addr_size_index(ofnode node, int index, u64 *size) { int na, ns;
u64 size;
if (ofnode_is_np(node)) { const __be32 *prop_val; uint flags;
prop_val = of_get_address(ofnode_to_np(node), index, &size,
if (!prop_val) return FDT_ADDR_T_NONE;prop_val = of_get_address(ofnode_to_np(node), index, size, &flags);
@@ -278,12 +277,19 @@ fdt_addr_t ofnode_get_addr_index(ofnode node, int index) ns = ofnode_read_simple_size_cells(ofnode_get_parent(node)); return fdtdec_get_addr_size_fixed(gd->fdt_blob, ofnode_to_offset(node), "reg",
index, na, ns, &size, true);
index, na, ns, size, true);
}
return FDT_ADDR_T_NONE;
}
+fdt_addr_t ofnode_get_addr_index(ofnode node, int index) +{
- u64 size;
- return ofnode_get_addr_size_index(node, index, &size);
+}
fdt_addr_t ofnode_get_addr(ofnode node) { return ofnode_get_addr_index(node, 0);

On 4 November 2018 at 22:47, Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com wrote:
Currently the else part of ofnode_get_addr_size_index function does not fetch addresses based on the index but rather just returns the base address. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com
drivers/core/ofnode.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
This should really have a sandbox test, e.g. see dm_test_fdt_remap_addr_flat,() for a test that relies on flagtree.

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 12:53, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
On 4 November 2018 at 22:47, Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com wrote:
Currently the else part of ofnode_get_addr_size_index function does not fetch addresses based on the index but rather just returns the base address. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com
drivers/core/ofnode.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
This should really have a sandbox test, e.g. see dm_test_fdt_remap_addr_flat,() for a test that relies on flagtree.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org

Hi Keerthy,
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 17:09, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 12:53, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
On 4 November 2018 at 22:47, Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com wrote:
Currently the else part of ofnode_get_addr_size_index function does not fetch addresses based on the index but rather just returns the base address. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com
drivers/core/ofnode.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
This should really have a sandbox test, e.g. see dm_test_fdt_remap_addr_flat,() for a test that relies on flagtree.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Unfortunately this patch causes build errors with sandbox. Can you please take a look? I skip the second patch in this series too, since it depends on this one.
Regards, Simon

On 11/19/2018 2:59 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Keerthy,
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 17:09, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 12:53, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
On 4 November 2018 at 22:47, Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com wrote:
Currently the else part of ofnode_get_addr_size_index function does not fetch addresses based on the index but rather just returns the base address. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com
drivers/core/ofnode.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
This should really have a sandbox test, e.g. see dm_test_fdt_remap_addr_flat,() for a test that relies on flagtree.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Unfortunately this patch causes build errors with sandbox. Can you please take a look? I skip the second patch in this series too, since it depends on this one.
Sure. Thanks for catching it.
Regards, Simon

On 11/19/2018 10:47 AM, J, KEERTHY wrote:
On 11/19/2018 2:59 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Keerthy,
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 17:09, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 12:53, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
On 4 November 2018 at 22:47, Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com wrote:
Currently the else part of ofnode_get_addr_size_index function does not fetch addresses based on the index but rather just returns the base address. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com
drivers/core/ofnode.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
This should really have a sandbox test, e.g. see dm_test_fdt_remap_addr_flat,() for a test that relies on flagtree.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Unfortunately this patch causes build errors with sandbox. Can you please take a look? I skip the second patch in this series too, since it depends on this one.
Sure. Thanks for catching it.
Simon,
Sent a v3 with sandbox_defconfig warnings fixed. Please let me know if they are fine.
Thanks, Keerthy
Regards, Simon
participants (3)
-
J, KEERTHY
-
Keerthy
-
Simon Glass