[U-Boot] [PATCH] mx27: rename fec_imx27 to fec_mxc

Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok yanok@emcraft.com --- cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c b/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c index b377fad..cbb6c85 100644 --- a/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c +++ b/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ int print_cpuinfo (void)
int cpu_eth_init(bd_t *bis) { -#if defined(CONFIG_FEC_IMX27) +#if defined(CONFIG_FEC_MXC) return fecimx27_initialize(bis); #else return 0;

Dear Ilya Yanok,
In message 1247828504-9806-1-git-send-email-yanok@emcraft.com you wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok yanok@emcraft.com
cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c b/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c index b377fad..cbb6c85 100644 --- a/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c +++ b/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ int print_cpuinfo (void)
int cpu_eth_init(bd_t *bis) { -#if defined(CONFIG_FEC_IMX27) +#if defined(CONFIG_FEC_MXC) return fecimx27_initialize(bis);
See Ben's comment - renaming the CONFIG_ variable but leaving fecimx27_initialize() makes no sense.
And this should be no separate patch, but squashed into the patch that adds the cpu_eth_init() code.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk

Hi Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok yanok@emcraft.com
cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c b/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c index b377fad..cbb6c85 100644 --- a/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c +++ b/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ int print_cpuinfo (void)
int cpu_eth_init(bd_t *bis) { -#if defined(CONFIG_FEC_IMX27) +#if defined(CONFIG_FEC_MXC) return fecimx27_initialize(bis);
See Ben's comment - renaming the CONFIG_ variable but leaving fecimx27_initialize() makes no sense.
Yes. That's my fault. I'll fix this and repost the patches.
And this should be no separate patch, but squashed into the patch that adds the cpu_eth_init() code.
Surely. I'll fix this too.
Regards, Ilya.
participants (2)
-
Ilya Yanok
-
Wolfgang Denk