[PATCH] bootstd: sata: bootdev scanning for ahci sata with no drive attached
It's normal to have no SATA drive attached to the controller, so return a successful status when there is no block device found after probing.
Note: this patch depends on the previous patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20230917230649.30357-1-mibo...
Signed-off-by: Tony Dinh mibodhi@gmail.com ---
drivers/ata/sata.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata.c b/drivers/ata/sata.c index f126b84e05..59c40a829f 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/sata.c +++ b/drivers/ata/sata.c @@ -79,6 +79,11 @@ int sata_rescan(bool verbose)
ret = uclass_probe_all(UCLASS_AHCI);
+ if (verbose && ret == -ENODEV) { + printf("No SATA block device found\n"); + return 0; + } + return ret; }
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 5:49 PM Tony Dinh mibodhi@gmail.com wrote:
It's normal to have no SATA drive attached to the controller, so return a successful status when there is no block device found after probing.
Note: this patch depends on the previous patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20230917230649.30357-1-mibo...
Signed-off-by: Tony Dinh mibodhi@gmail.com
drivers/ata/sata.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata.c b/drivers/ata/sata.c index f126b84e05..59c40a829f 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/sata.c +++ b/drivers/ata/sata.c @@ -79,6 +79,11 @@ int sata_rescan(bool verbose)
ret = uclass_probe_all(UCLASS_AHCI);
if (verbose && ret == -ENODEV) {printf("No SATA block device found\n");return 0;}return ret;}
-- 2.39.2
Sorry, I need to resend this patch (fat finger).
All the best, Tony
participants (1)
-
Tony Dinh