[U-Boot] [STATUS] Ready for -rc2?
Hello everybody,
are we ready for a -rc2 (so we don;t have to shift the release date any further), or are there any important fixes still missing?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 16:17:34 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
are we ready for a -rc2 (so we don;t have to shift the release date any further), or are there any important fixes still missing?
i wouldnt call them important, but they do fix build warnings: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/114291/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/114292/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/114293/ -mike
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201109201639.50467.vapier@gentoo.org you wrote:
--nextPart1405010.QQafST4r1z Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 16:17:34 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
are we ready for a -rc2 (so we don;t have to shift the release date any further), or are there any important fixes still missing?
i wouldnt call them important, but they do fix build warnings: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/114291/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/114292/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/114293/
Thanks for pointing out.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Hi Wolfgang,
Le 20/09/2011 22:17, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Hello everybody,
are we ready for a -rc2 (so we don;t have to shift the release date any further), or are there any important fixes still missing?
None on ARM side I think, apart from dropping ixdp425 and possibly also ixdpg425. That could be done between rc2 and actual release I guess.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Amicalement,
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4E78FA66.1050900@aribaud.net you wrote:
are we ready for a -rc2 (so we don;t have to shift the release date any further), or are there any important fixes still missing?
None on ARM side I think, apart from dropping ixdp425 and possibly also ixdpg425. That could be done between rc2 and actual release I guess.
Yes, that would be fine with me.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Hi Albert,
2011/9/21 Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.net
Hi Wolfgang,
Le 20/09/2011 22:17, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Hello everybody,
are we ready for a -rc2 (so we don;t have to shift the release date any further), or are there any important fixes still missing?
None on ARM side I think, apart from dropping ixdp425 and possibly also ixdpg425. That could be done between rc2 and actual release I guess.
I've noticed some of the patches send by Po-Yu for several months ago. Would you help checking if these bug fix should be merged into rc2 or should be into next version?
arm: a320: fix broken timer http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/109515/
arm: a320: fix multiline comment style http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/95847/
arm: a320: enable tagged list support http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/105375/
Thanks!
-- Best regards, Macpaul Lin
Wolfgang,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:17:34PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hello everybody,
are we ready for a -rc2 (so we don;t have to shift the release date any further), or are there any important fixes still missing?
Not a bugfix, but since it had been originally submitted before the merge window, you had mentioned it might be possible [1] to get it in:
[PATCH v8] dreamplug: initial board support. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/115270/
The main reason for the lateness was hammering out how to use a MACH_TYPE_XXX that isn't in mainline Linux yet. We didn't get it settled until 18 Sept. [2]. Otherwise, it would've been in sooner...
Please? :-)
thx,
Jason.
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg61627.html [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg61622.html
Dear Jason,
In message 20110920215703.GB7734@titan.lakedaemon.net you wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:17:34PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hello everybody,
are we ready for a -rc2 (so we don;t have to shift the release date any further), or are there any important fixes still missing?
Not a bugfix, but since it had been originally submitted before the merge window, you had mentioned it might be possible [1] to get it in:
[PATCH v8] dreamplug: initial board support. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/115270/
The main reason for the lateness was hammering out how to use a MACH_TYPE_XXX that isn't in mainline Linux yet. We didn't get it settled until 18 Sept. [2]. Otherwise, it would've been in sooner...
Please? :-)
It is up to the respective custodians in the chain (Prafulla, Albert) to apply and send pull requests.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Albert, Prafulla,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:00:42PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message 20110920215703.GB7734@titan.lakedaemon.net you wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:17:34PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hello everybody,
are we ready for a -rc2 (so we don;t have to shift the release date any further), or are there any important fixes still missing?
Not a bugfix, but since it had been originally submitted before the merge window, you had mentioned it might be possible [1] to get it in:
[PATCH v8] dreamplug: initial board support. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/115270/
The main reason for the lateness was hammering out how to use a MACH_TYPE_XXX that isn't in mainline Linux yet. We didn't get it settled until 18 Sept. [2]. Otherwise, it would've been in sooner...
Please? :-)
It is up to the respective custodians in the chain (Prafulla, Albert) to apply and send pull requests.
Any hope of making 2011.09?
thx,
Jason.
Hi all,
On 21/09/2011 23:34, Jason wrote:
Albert, Prafulla,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:00:42PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message20110920215703.GB7734@titan.lakedaemon.net you wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:17:34PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hello everybody,
are we ready for a -rc2 (so we don;t have to shift the release date any further), or are there any important fixes still missing?
Not a bugfix, but since it had been originally submitted before the merge window, you had mentioned it might be possible [1] to get it in:
[PATCH v8] dreamplug: initial board support. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/115270/
The main reason for the lateness was hammering out how to use a MACH_TYPE_XXX that isn't in mainline Linux yet. We didn't get it settled until 18 Sept. [2]. Otherwise, it would've been in sooner...
Please? :-)
It is up to the respective custodians in the chain (Prafulla, Albert) to apply and send pull requests.
Any hope of making 2011.09?
thx,
Jason.
Pinging this up for my information: this does not appear to be in u-boot-marvell ATM.
Prafulla, do you intend to pick this up? If not, then I can pick it up directly in u-boot-arm today (or Wolfgang can pick it up if he prefers).
Amicalement,
Albert, Prafulla,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:42:42AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
On 21/09/2011 23:34, Jason wrote:
Albert, Prafulla,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:00:42PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message20110920215703.GB7734@titan.lakedaemon.net you wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:17:34PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hello everybody,
are we ready for a -rc2 (so we don;t have to shift the release date any further), or are there any important fixes still missing?
Not a bugfix, but since it had been originally submitted before the merge window, you had mentioned it might be possible [1] to get it in:
[PATCH v8] dreamplug: initial board support. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/115270/
The main reason for the lateness was hammering out how to use a MACH_TYPE_XXX that isn't in mainline Linux yet. We didn't get it settled until 18 Sept. [2]. Otherwise, it would've been in sooner...
Please? :-)
It is up to the respective custodians in the chain (Prafulla, Albert) to apply and send pull requests.
Any hope of making 2011.09?
thx,
Jason.
Pinging this up for my information: this does not appear to be in u-boot-marvell ATM.
Prafulla, do you intend to pick this up? If not, then I can pick it up directly in u-boot-arm today (or Wolfgang can pick it up if he prefers).
Looks like it didn't make it. So, I've rebased it against v2011.09 and did a quick test. There's really no significant changes. Should I roll a v9 for the rebase? I'm inclined to think it's unnecessary...
thx,
Jason.
Hi Jason,
Le 29/09/2011 22:05, Jason a écrit :
Albert, Prafulla,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:42:42AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
On 21/09/2011 23:34, Jason wrote:
Albert, Prafulla,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:00:42PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message20110920215703.GB7734@titan.lakedaemon.net you wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:17:34PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hello everybody,
are we ready for a -rc2 (so we don;t have to shift the release date any further), or are there any important fixes still missing?
Not a bugfix, but since it had been originally submitted before the merge window, you had mentioned it might be possible [1] to get it in:
[PATCH v8] dreamplug: initial board support. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/115270/
The main reason for the lateness was hammering out how to use a MACH_TYPE_XXX that isn't in mainline Linux yet. We didn't get it settled until 18 Sept. [2]. Otherwise, it would've been in sooner...
Please? :-)
It is up to the respective custodians in the chain (Prafulla, Albert) to apply and send pull requests.
Any hope of making 2011.09?
thx,
Jason.
Pinging this up for my information: this does not appear to be in u-boot-marvell ATM.
Prafulla, do you intend to pick this up? If not, then I can pick it up directly in u-boot-arm today (or Wolfgang can pick it up if he prefers).
Looks like it didn't make it. So, I've rebased it against v2011.09 and did a quick test. There's really no significant changes. Should I roll a v9 for the rebase? I'm inclined to think it's unnecessary...
thx,
Jason.
It still applies cleanly onto the current u-boot-arm/master.
Prafulla, do you mind if I take it?
Amicalement,
Albert,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:54:14PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Jason,
Le 29/09/2011 22:05, Jason a écrit :
Albert, Prafulla,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:42:42AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
On 21/09/2011 23:34, Jason wrote:
Albert, Prafulla,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:00:42PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message20110920215703.GB7734@titan.lakedaemon.net you wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:17:34PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >Hello everybody, > >are we ready for a -rc2 (so we don;t have to shift the release date >any further), or are there any important fixes still missing?
Not a bugfix, but since it had been originally submitted before the merge window, you had mentioned it might be possible [1] to get it in:
[PATCH v8] dreamplug: initial board support. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/115270/
The main reason for the lateness was hammering out how to use a MACH_TYPE_XXX that isn't in mainline Linux yet. We didn't get it settled until 18 Sept. [2]. Otherwise, it would've been in sooner...
Please? :-)
It is up to the respective custodians in the chain (Prafulla, Albert) to apply and send pull requests.
Any hope of making 2011.09?
thx,
Jason.
Pinging this up for my information: this does not appear to be in u-boot-marvell ATM.
Prafulla, do you intend to pick this up? If not, then I can pick it up directly in u-boot-arm today (or Wolfgang can pick it up if he prefers).
Looks like it didn't make it. So, I've rebased it against v2011.09 and did a quick test. There's really no significant changes. Should I roll a v9 for the rebase? I'm inclined to think it's unnecessary...
thx,
Jason.
It still applies cleanly onto the current u-boot-arm/master.
Prafulla, do you mind if I take it?
Prafulla has already pulled it into his tree, I imagine it will be in his next pull request.
thx,
Jason.
Wolfgang,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
Hello everybody,
are we ready for a -rc2 (so we don;t have to shift the release date any further), or are there any important fixes still missing?
Just to let you know, x86 still builds @ HEAD, so I'm fine for an rc2
Regards,
Graeme
participants (6)
-
Albert ARIBAUD -
Graeme Russ -
Jason -
Mike Frysinger -
Wolfgang Denk -
馬克泡