Re: [U-Boot-Users] skipping bad blocks when erasing nand
On Friday, July 14th, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
I tend to agree here, which was the reason that I said I was willing to accept the patch, but that at least the printf() shoould be kept so that the user gets the warning.
Sorry for the delay. Here's a patch that lets the erase continue, but does print a message.
-DB
David Byron wrote:
On Friday, July 14th, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
I tend to agree here, which was the reason that I said I was willing to accept the patch, but that at least the printf() shoould be kept so that the user gets the warning.
Sorry for the delay. Here's a patch that lets the erase continue, but does print a message.
Instead of printing a message for each block, I think it would be neater to give a summary at the end like:
x blocks erased successfully. y blocks ignored.
nand bad command gives the list anyway if someone is more inclined to find out what blocks.
What do you (and Wolfgang) think about my proposal?
Tolunay
Hi Tolunay,
On Friday 21 July 2006 01:22, Tolunay Orkun wrote:
Instead of printing a message for each block, I think it would be neater to give a summary at the end like:
x blocks erased successfully. y blocks ignored.
Good idea.
nand bad command gives the list anyway if someone is more inclined to find out what blocks.
What do you (and Wolfgang) think about my proposal?
I would also prefer this kind of implementation. Just my $0.02.
Best regards, Stefan
participants (3)
-
David Byron -
Stefan Roese -
Tolunay Orkun