Commit b5b004ad8a0ac6f98bd5708ec8b22fbddd1c1042 caused the sector_size to be calculated incorrectly when the part size was not hardcoded. This is because the new code relied on part->size but tried to do the calculation before it was initialized properly, and it did not take into consideration the magic SIZE_REMAINING define.

Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vapier@gentoo.org --- common/cmd_jffs2.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/cmd_jffs2.c b/common/cmd_jffs2.c index 372ccb2..6799cca 100644 --- a/common/cmd_jffs2.c +++ b/common/cmd_jffs2.c @@ -406,8 +406,6 @@ int mtdparts_init(void) part->offset = 0x00000000; #endif

- part->sector_size = get_part_sector_size(id, part); - part->dev = current_mtd_dev; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&part->link);

@@ -415,6 +413,8 @@ int mtdparts_init(void) if (part->size == SIZE_REMAINING) part->size = id->size - part->offset;

+ part->sector_size = get_part_sector_size(id, part); + DEBUGF("part : name = %s, size = 0x%08lx, offset = 0x%08lx\n", part->name, part->size, part->offset);