Wolfgang,

...

This patch:

• Adds flash_write_cfibuffer support for AMD/Spansion Flashes.

This was splitted from previous patch.

I am confused. I have two messages from you (sent from different addresses, but both on Tue, 30 Aug 2005, with two different patches:

Yeah, this is quite confusing. First one was submitted which my proposed changes. But after sending it I read some comments from Yuli Barcohen, so I send the second one with the changes for those comments (mainly, not using different command defines, but shifting the actual command).

...

Signed-off-by: Thomas Schaefer thomas.schaefer@kontron.com Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bastos alebas@televes.com

CHANGELOG:

• Add support for AMD/Spansion Flashes in flash_write_cfibuffer Patch by Alex Bastos and Thomas Schaefer, 2005-08-29

...

...

Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="20050830_cfi_flash_A.diff"

and

[no CHANGELOG entry]

The CHANGELOG should be the same than in thefirst patch

...

It may be enough shifting the address each time it is needed (in fact, only two times).

Suggestions?

...

...

Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="20050830_cfi_flash_B.diff"

Are these two patches in alternative? Or additional? Or just for disussion? Or what?

So, Should I say alternative?. Maybe the second is most a RFC. Sorry about the confusing stuff. Working with mixed environments (OS, email clients, hours, etc)

Best regards,

Alex BASTOS