[U-Boot] [PATCH] Remove CONFIG_MVGBE from config_whitelist.txt
Now that there are more boards defining this it can be removed from the whitelist.
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham judge.packham@gmail.com ---
scripts/config_whitelist.txt | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/config_whitelist.txt b/scripts/config_whitelist.txt index 71df6dbebde6..19b573c3d3f3 100644 --- a/scripts/config_whitelist.txt +++ b/scripts/config_whitelist.txt @@ -1334,7 +1334,6 @@ CONFIG_MTD_UBI_MODULE CONFIG_MULTI_CS CONFIG_MUSB_HOST CONFIG_MVEBU_MMC -CONFIG_MVGBE CONFIG_MVGBE_PORTS CONFIG_MVMFP_V2 CONFIG_MVS
On 16 May 2018 at 02:34, Chris Packham judge.packham@gmail.com wrote:
Now that there are more boards defining this it can be removed from the whitelist.
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham judge.packham@gmail.com
scripts/config_whitelist.txt | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 08:34:14PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
Now that there are more boards defining this it can be removed from the whitelist.
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham judge.packham@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
Hi Tom, On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:12 AM Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 08:34:14PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
Now that there are more boards defining this it can be removed from the whitelist.
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham judge.packham@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
Not a big deal but it appears you picked up v1 when there was a v2 posted http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/921018/ the only change was fixing a typo in the commit message so no harm done. Just wondering if there is something I should be doing to make this more obvious? Specifically does patman need to grow support for dealing with In-reply-to:?
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:12:22AM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
Hi Tom, On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:12 AM Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 08:34:14PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
Now that there are more boards defining this it can be removed from the whitelist.
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham judge.packham@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
Not a big deal but it appears you picked up v1 when there was a v2 posted http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/921018/ the only change was fixing a typo in the commit message so no harm done. Just wondering if there is something I should be doing to make this more obvious? Specifically does patman need to grow support for dealing with In-reply-to:?
Unfortunate timing. I grabbed v1 on Friday before you posted v2 and actually had this ready to go Saturday or so, but some back-end stuff wasn't resolved until today.
participants (3)
-
Chris Packham -
Simon Glass -
Tom Rini