[U-Boot] [PATCH] EXYNOS: Rename exynos5_tzpc structure to s5p_tzpc
TZPC IP is common across S5P and Exynos based SoC'c. Renaming exynos5_tzpc in arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h to s5p_tzpc will allow generic usase of tzpc.
Also modify board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c to use s5p_tzpc.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h | 2 +- board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h index 2c9a07b..63736ae 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ #define __TZPC_H_
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ -struct exynos5_tzpc { +struct s5p_tzpc { unsigned int r0size; char res1[0x7FC]; unsigned int decprot0stat; diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c b/board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c index c2ccef3..03e46bb 100644 --- a/board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c +++ b/board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ /* Setting TZPC[TrustZone Protection Controller] */ void tzpc_init(void) { - struct exynos5_tzpc *tzpc; + struct s5p_tzpc *tzpc; unsigned int addr;
for (addr = TZPC0_BASE; addr <= TZPC9_BASE; addr += TZPC_BASE_OFFSET) {
Hi Chander,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org wrote:
TZPC IP is common across S5P and Exynos based SoC'c. Renaming exynos5_tzpc in arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h to s5p_tzpc will allow generic usase of tzpc.
Also modify board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c to use s5p_tzpc.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h | 2 +- board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h index 2c9a07b..63736ae 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ #define __TZPC_H_
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ -struct exynos5_tzpc { +struct s5p_tzpc {
I think 'exynos' is preferable. Even though each SOC has different number of tzpc. It can be covered one exynos_tzpc. or we can define it for each SoC.
Thank you, Kyungmin Park
unsigned int r0size; char res1[0x7FC]; unsigned int decprot0stat; diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c b/board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c index c2ccef3..03e46bb 100644 --- a/board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c +++ b/board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ /* Setting TZPC[TrustZone Protection Controller] */ void tzpc_init(void) {
- struct exynos5_tzpc *tzpc;
- struct s5p_tzpc *tzpc;
unsigned int addr;
for (addr = TZPC0_BASE; addr <= TZPC9_BASE; addr += TZPC_BASE_OFFSET) {
1.7.5.4
linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Hi Kyungmin Park,
On 14 March 2012 19:02, Kyungmin Park kmpark@infradead.org wrote:
Hi Chander,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org wrote:
TZPC IP is common across S5P and Exynos based SoC'c. Renaming exynos5_tzpc in arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h to s5p_tzpc will allow generic usase of tzpc.
Also modify board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c to use s5p_tzpc.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h | 2 +- board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h index 2c9a07b..63736ae 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ #define __TZPC_H_
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ -struct exynos5_tzpc { +struct s5p_tzpc {
I think 'exynos' is preferable. Even though each SOC has different
I tried to carry forward old conventions as in case of watchdog. I will change it to exynos.
number of tzpc. It can be covered one exynos_tzpc. or we can define it for each SoC.
One structure is enough as fields are same.
Thank you, Kyungmin Park
unsigned int r0size; char res1[0x7FC]; unsigned int decprot0stat; diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c b/board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c index c2ccef3..03e46bb 100644 --- a/board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c +++ b/board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ /* Setting TZPC[TrustZone Protection Controller] */ void tzpc_init(void) {
- struct exynos5_tzpc *tzpc;
- struct s5p_tzpc *tzpc;
unsigned int addr;
for (addr = TZPC0_BASE; addr <= TZPC9_BASE; addr += TZPC_BASE_OFFSET) {
1.7.5.4
linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Dear Chander Kashyap,
On 14 March 2012 22:38, Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Kyungmin Park,
On 14 March 2012 19:02, Kyungmin Park kmpark@infradead.org wrote:
Hi Chander,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org wrote:
TZPC IP is common across S5P and Exynos based SoC'c. Renaming exynos5_tzpc in arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h to s5p_tzpc will allow generic usase of tzpc.
Also modify board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c to use s5p_tzpc.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h | 2 +- board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h index 2c9a07b..63736ae 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ #define __TZPC_H_
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ -struct exynos5_tzpc { +struct s5p_tzpc {
I think 'exynos' is preferable. Even though each SOC has different
I tried to carry forward old conventions as in case of watchdog. I will change it to exynos.
I agreed with Kyungmin.
From now, let's called "exynos" for common name including s5pc1xx and
s5pc2xx and exynos4 and exynos5.. etc.
number of tzpc. It can be covered one exynos_tzpc. or we can define it for each SoC.
One structure is enough as fields are same.
Thanks Minkyu Kang.
Dear Minkyu,
On 15 March 2012 06:53, Minkyu Kang promsoft@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Chander Kashyap,
On 14 March 2012 22:38, Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Kyungmin Park,
On 14 March 2012 19:02, Kyungmin Park kmpark@infradead.org wrote:
Hi Chander,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org wrote:
TZPC IP is common across S5P and Exynos based SoC'c. Renaming exynos5_tzpc in arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h to s5p_tzpc will allow generic usase of tzpc.
Also modify board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c to use s5p_tzpc.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h | 2 +- board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h index 2c9a07b..63736ae 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ #define __TZPC_H_
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ -struct exynos5_tzpc { +struct s5p_tzpc {
I think 'exynos' is preferable. Even though each SOC has different
I tried to carry forward old conventions as in case of watchdog. I will change it to exynos.
I agreed with Kyungmin. From now, let's called "exynos" for common name including s5pc1xx and s5pc2xx and exynos4 and exynos5.. etc.
Thanks for the inputs. Let us follow the convention. I will resubmit the patch.
number of tzpc. It can be covered one exynos_tzpc. or we can define it for each SoC.
One structure is enough as fields are same.
Thanks Minkyu Kang. -- from. prom. www.promsoft.net
On 03/15/2012 06:53 AM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
Dear Chander Kashyap,
On 14 March 2012 22:38, Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Kyungmin Park,
On 14 March 2012 19:02, Kyungmin Park kmpark@infradead.org wrote:
Hi Chander,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org wrote:
TZPC IP is common across S5P and Exynos based SoC'c. Renaming exynos5_tzpc in arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h to s5p_tzpc will allow generic usase of tzpc.
Also modify board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c to use s5p_tzpc.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h | 2 +- board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h index 2c9a07b..63736ae 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ #define __TZPC_H_
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ -struct exynos5_tzpc { +struct s5p_tzpc {
I think 'exynos' is preferable. Even though each SOC has different
I tried to carry forward old conventions as in case of watchdog. I will change it to exynos.
I agreed with Kyungmin. From now, let's called "exynos" for common name including s5pc1xx and s5pc2xx and exynos4 and exynos5.. etc.
From the above list, only s5pc1xx series was not named EXYNOS.
number of tzpc. It can be covered one exynos_tzpc. or we can define it for each SoC.
One structure is enough as fields are same.
Thanks Minkyu Kang.
participants (4)
-
Chander Kashyap -
Kyungmin Park -
Minkyu Kang -
Tushar Behera