Dear Chander Kashyap,

On 14 March 2012 15:42, Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org wrote:

Exynos based SoC's have two different naming conventions. One is S5PC_XXXX and other is EXXX_XXXX. This patch adds generic code to handle EXXX_XXXX connvention.

Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org

arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/cpu.h |    5 ++++-  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/cpu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/cpu.h index 89f2c2e..da89ccf 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/cpu.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/cpu.h @@ -105,10 +105,13 @@ static inline void s5p_set_cpu_id(void)        }  }

+#define EXYNOS_ID      ((readl(EXYNOS4_PRO_ID) & (0xF << 24)) >> 24)  #define IS_SAMSUNG_TYPE(type, id)                      \  static inline int cpu_is_##type(void)                  \  {                                                      \

• return s5p_cpu_id == id ? 1 : 0;                \

• return ((s5p_cpu_id == id)                      \
• || (EXYNOS_ID == (#type[sizeof(#type) - 2] - '0'))) \
• ? 1 : 0;                                \

}

Sorry, I can't understand this patch. What is it for?

Thanks. Minkyu Kang.