[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] omap4: Use a smaller M,N couple for IVA DPLL

This reduced M,N couple corresponds to the advised value from TI HW team.
Tested on 4460 Pandaboard, it also provides peripheral clocks closer to the advised values.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Jan s-jan@ti.com --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/clocks.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/clocks.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/clocks.c index c568951..1d92e66 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/clocks.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/clocks.c @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static const struct dpll_params iva_dpll_params_1862mhz[NUM_SYS_CLKS] = { {727, 14, -1, -1, 4, 7, -1, -1}, /* 19.2 MHz */ {931, 25, -1, -1, 4, 7, -1, -1}, /* 26 MHz */ {931, 26, -1, -1, 4, 7, -1, -1}, /* 27 MHz */ - {412, 16, -1, -1, 4, 7, -1, -1} /* 38.4 MHz */ + {291, 11, -1, -1, 4, 7, -1, -1} /* 38.4 MHz */ };
/* ABE M & N values with sys_clk as source */

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 05:16:40PM +0200, Sebastien Jan wrote:
This reduced M,N couple corresponds to the advised value from TI HW team.
Tested on 4460 Pandaboard, it also provides peripheral clocks closer to the advised values.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Jan s-jan@ti.com
Queued up for u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
participants (2)
-
Sebastien Jan
-
Tom Rini