commit 39ac34473f3c96e77cbe03a49141771ed1639486 ("cmd_mtdparts: use 64 bits for flash size, partition size & offset") introduced warnings in a couple places due to printf formats or pointer casting.

This patch fixes the warnings pointed out here: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-October/164981.html

Signed-off-by: Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com Cc: York Sun yorksun@freescale.com Cc: Stefan Roese sr@denx.de Cc: Paul Burton paul.burton@imgtec.com Cc: Tom Rini trini@ti.com --- Alternatively, given the imminent release, perhaps all but the first patch of my recent NAND pull request should be reverted. The first patch was a regression fix, but on a second look the remaining patches look more like enabling a new feature (and I didn't look too closely at the ubi patches because Stefan had acked them and asked me to apply; patch 4 is clearly not a bugfix).

I'm not sure why I didn't catch these warnings as I did run a makeall on arm and ppc. The only thing I can guess is that I forgot to check the ppc results, or I missed them among other pre-existing warnings such as the "AltiVec not supported in this target" warnings I get from 86xx builds. --- common/fdt_support.c | 4 ++-- fs/cramfs/cramfs.c | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/fdt_support.c b/common/fdt_support.c index b034c98..1f0d8f5 100644 --- a/common/fdt_support.c +++ b/common/fdt_support.c @@ -766,11 +766,11 @@ int fdt_node_set_part_info(void *blob, int parent_offset,

part = list_entry(pentry, struct part_info, link);

- debug("%2d: %-20s0x%08x\t0x%08x\t%d\n", + debug("%2d: %-20s0x%08llx\t0x%08llx\t%d\n", part_num, part->name, part->size, part->offset, part->mask_flags);

- sprintf(buf, "partition@%x", part->offset); + sprintf(buf, "partition@%llx", part->offset); add_sub: ret = fdt_add_subnode(blob, parent_offset, buf); if (ret == -FDT_ERR_NOSPACE) { diff --git a/fs/cramfs/cramfs.c b/fs/cramfs/cramfs.c index e578a1e..fd8e4ef 100644 --- a/fs/cramfs/cramfs.c +++ b/fs/cramfs/cramfs.c @@ -43,9 +43,10 @@ struct cramfs_super super; * device address space offset, so we need to shift it by a device start address. */ #if !defined(CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH) extern flash_info_t flash_info[]; -#define PART_OFFSET(x) (x->offset + flash_info[x->dev->id->num].start[0]) +#define PART_OFFSET(x) ((ulong)x->offset + \ + flash_info[x->dev->id->num].start[0]) #else -#define PART_OFFSET(x) (x->offset) +#define PART_OFFSET(x) ((ulong)x->offset) #endif

static int cramfs_read_super (struct part_info *info)