[U-Boot-Users] [PPC4xx] Please pull git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git
The following changes since commit fa1aef15bcd47736687be1af544506e90fba545d: Stefan Roese (1): Use dynamic SDRAM TLB setup on AMCC Ocotea eval board
are found in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git
Stefan Roese (5): ppc4xx: Update 440SP/440SPe DDR SPD setup code to support 440SP ppc4xx: Small AMCC Katmai 440SPe update Update AMCC Yucca 440SPe eval board support Update AMCC Luan 440SP eval board support Merge with /home/stefan/git/u-boot/yucca-ddr2
board/amcc/katmai/init.S | 10 ++ board/amcc/luan/init.S | 170 ++++++++---------------- board/amcc/luan/luan.c | 99 -------------- board/amcc/luan/u-boot.lds | 13 -- board/amcc/yucca/init.S | 83 ++++-------- board/amcc/yucca/yucca.c | 316 +------------------------------------------- cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c | 64 ++++++---- cpu/ppc4xx/start.S | 2 +- include/configs/katmai.h | 1 + include/configs/luan.h | 18 +-- include/configs/yucca.h | 14 +- include/ppc440.h | 25 ++++- 12 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 644 deletions(-)
In message 200703081035.51792.sr@denx.de you wrote:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git
Stefan Roese (5): ppc4xx: Update 440SP/440SPe DDR SPD setup code to support 440SP ppc4xx: Small AMCC Katmai 440SPe update Update AMCC Yucca 440SPe eval board support Update AMCC Luan 440SP eval board support Merge with /home/stefan/git/u-boot/yucca-ddr2
Merged. Thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Stefan Roese sr@denx.de wrote:
The following changes since commit fa1aef15bcd47736687be1af544506e90fba545d: Stefan Roese (1): Use dynamic SDRAM TLB setup on AMCC Ocotea eval board
are found in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git
Could it be possible to paste the change on this list? It would be better for change tracking by maillist.
Thanks,
Sam
Best regards,
Sam
___________________________________________________________ 抢注雅虎免费邮箱-3.5G容量，20M附件！ http://cn.mail.yahoo.com
On Thursday 08 March 2007 15:50, Sam Song wrote:
Stefan Roese sr@denx.de wrote:
The following changes since commit fa1aef15bcd47736687be1af544506e90fba545d: Stefan Roese (1): Use dynamic SDRAM TLB setup on AMCC Ocotea eval board
are found in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git
Could it be possible to paste the change on this list? It would be better for change tracking by maillist.
The patch summary is posted. So I assume you are talking about the complete patch itself, right? I'm not sure if we want to do this. In this example it would have been no problem, but normally these pull requests will generate a quite big patch, that will collide with the max mail-size of the mailing-list.
Best regards, Stefan
===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich, CEO: Wolfgang Denk Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany =====================================================================
Stefan Roese sr@denx.de wrote:
On Thursday 08 March 2007 15:50, Sam Song wrote:
Could it be possible to paste the change on this list? It would be better for change tracking by maillist.
The patch summary is posted. So I assume you are talking about the complete patch itself, right? I'm not sure if we want to do this. In
Yes. Well, I found the details on your gitweb. It is clear there.
http://www.denx.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=u-boot-ppc4xx.git;a=summary
Thanks,
Sam
___________________________________________________________ Mp3疯狂搜-新歌热歌高速下 http://music.yahoo.com.cn/?source=mail_mailbox_footer
In message 200703081601.00260.sr@denx.de you wrote:
Could it be possible to paste the change on this list? It would be better for change tracking by maillist.
The patch summary is posted. So I assume you are talking about the complete patch itself, right? I'm not sure if we want to do this. In this example it
We have a special situation here insofar, as Stefan as the Custodian added patches himself.
would have been no problem, but normally these pull requests will generate a quite big patch, that will collide with the max mail-size of the mailing-list.
It makes no sense to post patches for such custodians pull requests.
I also check in patches without posting them first... It's kind of common law... Is this a problem to anybody?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
participants (3)
-
Sam Song -
Stefan Roese -
Wolfgang Denk