[PATCH] mmc: fsl_esdhc: remove 1ms sleep in esdhc_send_cmd_common()

Since the beginning of this driver which was initially for the MPC8379 and MPC8536 SoCs, there is this spurious 1ms delay. According to the comment it should actually be only 8 clock cycles. Esp. during EFI block transfers, this 1ms add up to a significant delay and slows down EFI boot.
I couldn't find any mention in the MPC8536 that there should be a delay of 8 clock cycles between commands. The SD card specification mentions that the clock has to be left enabled for 8 cycles after a command or response. But I don't see how this delay will help with this.
Go ahead and just remove it. If there will ever be any regression we can introduce a compile time flag, but for now I'd like to keep it simple.
In the split off imx driver this delay was also removed in commit 9098682200e6 ("mmc: fsl_esdhc_imx: remove the 1ms delay before sending command").
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle michael@walle.cc --- drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c index 1d98fa65c4..ebb307e950 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c @@ -361,13 +361,6 @@ static int esdhc_send_cmd_common(struct fsl_esdhc_priv *priv, struct mmc *mmc, while (esdhc_read32(®s->prsstat) & PRSSTAT_DLA) ;
- /* Wait at least 8 SD clock cycles before the next command */ - /* - * Note: This is way more than 8 cycles, but 1ms seems to - * resolve timing issues with some cards - */ - udelay(1000); - /* Set up for a data transfer if we have one */ if (data) { err = esdhc_setup_data(priv, mmc, data);

Hi,
On 9/10/21 6:20 PM, Michael Walle wrote:
Since the beginning of this driver which was initially for the MPC8379 and MPC8536 SoCs, there is this spurious 1ms delay. According to the comment it should actually be only 8 clock cycles. Esp. during EFI block transfers, this 1ms add up to a significant delay and slows down EFI boot.
I couldn't find any mention in the MPC8536 that there should be a delay of 8 clock cycles between commands. The SD card specification mentions that the clock has to be left enabled for 8 cycles after a command or response. But I don't see how this delay will help with this.
Go ahead and just remove it. If there will ever be any regression we can introduce a compile time flag, but for now I'd like to keep it simple.
In the split off imx driver this delay was also removed in commit 9098682200e6 ("mmc: fsl_esdhc_imx: remove the 1ms delay before sending command").
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle michael@walle.cc
If someone can test with this patch, I think that it's more better. But i don't have any objection to apply this patch.
Reviewed-by: Jaehoon Chung jh80.chung@samsung.com
Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung
drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c index 1d98fa65c4..ebb307e950 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c @@ -361,13 +361,6 @@ static int esdhc_send_cmd_common(struct fsl_esdhc_priv *priv, struct mmc *mmc, while (esdhc_read32(®s->prsstat) & PRSSTAT_DLA) ;
- /* Wait at least 8 SD clock cycles before the next command */
- /*
* Note: This is way more than 8 cycles, but 1ms seems to
* resolve timing issues with some cards
*/
- udelay(1000);
- /* Set up for a data transfer if we have one */ if (data) { err = esdhc_setup_data(priv, mmc, data);
participants (2)
-
Jaehoon Chung
-
Michael Walle