[U-Boot] aarch64-linux-gnu-objdump gives all zeros in init_sequence_f[]
Hi,
I need some help to understand aarch64-linux-gnu-objdump output in .data section as below. It's part of the dump of u-boot image with command 'aarch64-linux-gnu-objdump -D -z u-boot'.
Disassembly of section .data:
0000000035039898 <reserved_list>: <snip>
0000000035039948 <init_sequence_f>: 35039948: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 3503994c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039950: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039954: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039958: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 3503995c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039960: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039964: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039968: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 3503996c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039970: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039974: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039978: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 3503997c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039980: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039984: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039988: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 3503998c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039990: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039994: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039998: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 3503999c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399a0: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399a4: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399a8: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399ac: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399b0: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399b4: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399b8: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399bc: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399c0: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399c4: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399c8: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399cc: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399d0: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399d4: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399d8: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399dc: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399e0: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399e4: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399e8: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399ec: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399f0: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399f4: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399f8: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399fc: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a00: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a04: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a08: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a0c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a10: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a14: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a18: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a1c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a20: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a24: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a28: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a2c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a30: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a34: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a38: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a3c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a40: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a44: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a48: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a4c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000
The init_sequence_f[] is an array defined in U-Boot v2015.04 source common/board_f.c, which holds a bunch of pointers to critical initialization functions that have to be called during boot. Obviously, the array cannot be all zeros like what objdump tells. And I confirmed that by printing the pointers at run-time as below.
init_sequence_f[0]: 0000000035004280 init_sequence_f[1]: 00000000350042a8 init_sequence_f[2]: 0000000035004380 init_sequence_f[3]: 00000000350042a0 init_sequence_f[4]: 00000000350044b8 init_sequence_f[5]: 0000000035004388 init_sequence_f[6]: 0000000035029538 init_sequence_f[7]: 000000003500675c init_sequence_f[8]: 000000003500447c init_sequence_f[9]: 000000003501d864 init_sequence_f[10]: 0000000035013778 init_sequence_f[11]: 0000000035004398 init_sequence_f[12]: 0000000035028ab8 init_sequence_f[13]: 0000000035004278 init_sequence_f[14]: 0000000035004270 init_sequence_f[15]: 000000003500445c init_sequence_f[16]: 0000000035001f20 init_sequence_f[17]: 0000000035004574 init_sequence_f[18]: 00000000350042b0 init_sequence_f[19]: 00000000350042c4 init_sequence_f[20]: 00000000350042cc init_sequence_f[21]: 00000000350042f8 init_sequence_f[22]: 00000000350044d4 init_sequence_f[23]: 000000003500430c init_sequence_f[24]: 0000000035004314 init_sequence_f[25]: 0000000035004330 init_sequence_f[26]: 0000000035004390 init_sequence_f[27]: 00000000350045bc init_sequence_f[28]: 0000000035004550 init_sequence_f[29]: 0000000035004518 init_sequence_f[30]: 0000000035004378 init_sequence_f[31]: 0000000035004428 init_sequence_f[32]: 00000000350043f0
Dumping an u-boot image built for 32-bit platform with arm-linux-gnueabi-objdump gives correct pointer values for the same array.
17853c7c <init_sequence_f>: 17853c7c: 17805600 strne r5, [r0, r0, lsl #12] 17853c80: 17805620 strne r5, [r0, r0, lsr #12] 17853c84: 1780574c strne r5, [r0, ip, asr #14] 17853c88: 178007ec strne r0, [r0, ip, ror #15] 17853c8c: 1780583c ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x1780583c 17853c90: 17805834 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17805834 17853c94: 1780315c ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x1780315c 17853c98: 178015f4 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x178015f4 17853c9c: 17800890 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17800890 17853ca0: 17801c0c strne r1, [r0, ip, lsl #24] 17853ca4: 178078f8 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x178078f8 17853ca8: 17805808 strne r5, [r0, r8, lsl #16] 17853cac: 17829564 strne r9, [r2, r4, ror #10] 17853cb0: 17816104 strne r6, [r1, r4, lsl #2] 17853cb4: 1783dea4 strne sp, [r3, r4, lsr #29] 17853cb8: 178055f8 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x178055f8 17853cbc: 17801a54 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17801a54 17853cc0: 17805b4c strne r5, [r0, ip, asr #22] 17853cc4: 178057e0 strne r5, [r0, r0, ror #15] 17853cc8: 178057c8 strne r5, [r0, r8, asr #15] 17853ccc: 17802e20 strne r2, [r0, r0, lsr #28] 17853cd0: 17805910 usada8ne r0, r0, r9, r5 17853cd4: 17805628 strne r5, [r0, r8, lsr #12] 17853cd8: 17805640 strne r5, [r0, r0, asr #12] 17853cdc: 17805678 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17805678 17853ce0: 17805680 strne r5, [r0, r0, lsl #13] 17853ce4: 178056b0 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x178056b0 17853ce8: 17805850 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17805850 17853cec: 178056c8 strne r5, [r0, r8, asr #13] 17853cf0: 178056dc ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x178056dc 17853cf4: 178056f8 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x178056f8 17853cf8: 17805768 strne r5, [r0, r8, ror #14] 17853cfc: 17805950 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17805950 17853d00: 178058ec strne r5, [r0, ip, ror #17] 17853d04: 17805894 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17805894 17853d08: 17805744 strne r5, [r0, r4, asr #14] 17853d0c: 17805798 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17805798 17853d10: 17805770 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17805770 17853d14: 00000000 andeq r0, r0, r0
Here are my questions:
- Is this only because that ARM 64-bit toolchain doesn't show the real value of the pointers, or there are some linking or run-time magics to get these pointers correct when the binary is actually running?
- Is this different behavior between ARM 32-bit and 64-bit toolchain expected? Or did I miss anything on 64-bit toolchain usage?
Any hints or comments are much appreciated.
Thanks, Shawn
On 12 November 2015 at 06:43, Shawn Guo shawn.guo@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
I need some help to understand aarch64-linux-gnu-objdump output in .data section as below. It's part of the dump of u-boot image with command 'aarch64-linux-gnu-objdump -D -z u-boot'.
Disassembly of section .data:
0000000035039898 <reserved_list>: <snip>
0000000035039948 <init_sequence_f>: 35039948: 00000000 .word 0x00000000
[...]
35039a48: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a4c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000The init_sequence_f[] is an array defined in U-Boot v2015.04 source common/board_f.c, which holds a bunch of pointers to critical initialization functions that have to be called during boot. Obviously, the array cannot be all zeros like what objdump tells. And I confirmed that by printing the pointers at run-time as below.
[..]
Here are my questions:
- Is this only because that ARM 64-bit toolchain doesn't show the real value of the pointers, or there are some linking or run-time magics to get these pointers correct when the binary is actually running?
AArch64 uses the ELF RELA relocation format, where the target location of the relocation is not used to hold the addend. In contrast, ARM uses the REL format, where the addend is stored in the same place where the result of the relocation computation needs to be stored.
Since U-Boot is a PIE executable, it makes heavy use of R_ARM_RELATIVE/R_AARCH64_RELATIVE relocations, which are not symbol based, but simply point to places in the binary such as your init array) where the offset between the link time and load time addresses needs to be taken into account. For this type of relocation (and since the u-boot link time base address is 0x0), the addends happen to coincide with the actual addresses of the functions. These relocations are applied at runtime by u-boot itself, since it moves itself to the top of DRAM right after boot.
In the AArch64 case, these addends are stored in the relocation entries themselves. If you dump the relocations form the u-boot binary using readelf, you will probably find the values you are looking for.
- Is this different behavior between ARM 32-bit and 64-bit toolchain expected? Or did I miss anything on 64-bit toolchain usage?
This is expected, although a bit unfortunate, since you may need a post-build step to apply the relocations in case you need them applied in the static image (i.e., a ROM image).
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 07:36:02AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 12 November 2015 at 06:43, Shawn Guo shawn.guo@linaro.org wrote:
Here are my questions:
- Is this only because that ARM 64-bit toolchain doesn't show the real value of the pointers, or there are some linking or run-time magics to get these pointers correct when the binary is actually running?
AArch64 uses the ELF RELA relocation format, where the target location of the relocation is not used to hold the addend. In contrast, ARM uses the REL format, where the addend is stored in the same place where the result of the relocation computation needs to be stored.
Since U-Boot is a PIE executable, it makes heavy use of R_ARM_RELATIVE/R_AARCH64_RELATIVE relocations, which are not symbol based, but simply point to places in the binary such as your init array) where the offset between the link time and load time addresses needs to be taken into account. For this type of relocation (and since the u-boot link time base address is 0x0), the addends happen to coincide with the actual addresses of the functions. These relocations are applied at runtime by u-boot itself, since it moves itself to the top of DRAM right after boot.
In the AArch64 case, these addends are stored in the relocation entries themselves. If you dump the relocations form the u-boot binary using readelf, you will probably find the values you are looking for.
Thanks a lot for the pointer, Ard. With your hints, I'm looking at U-Boot commit 8137af19e75a (arm64: Add tool to statically apply RELA relocations) and getting the idea how this thing works on arm64.
Thanks again.
Shawn
Hello Shawn,
On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:43:18 +0800, Shawn Guo shawn.guo@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
I need some help to understand aarch64-linux-gnu-objdump output in .data section as below. It's part of the dump of u-boot image with command 'aarch64-linux-gnu-objdump -D -z u-boot'.
Disassembly of section .data:
0000000035039898 <reserved_list>:
<snip>
0000000035039948 <init_sequence_f>: 35039948: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 3503994c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039950: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039954: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039958: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 3503995c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039960: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039964: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039968: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 3503996c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039970: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039974: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039978: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 3503997c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039980: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039984: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039988: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 3503998c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039990: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039994: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039998: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 3503999c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399a0: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399a4: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399a8: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399ac: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399b0: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399b4: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399b8: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399bc: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399c0: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399c4: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399c8: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399cc: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399d0: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399d4: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399d8: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399dc: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399e0: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399e4: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399e8: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399ec: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399f0: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399f4: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399f8: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 350399fc: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a00: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a04: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a08: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a0c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a10: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a14: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a18: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a1c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a20: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a24: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a28: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a2c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a30: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a34: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a38: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a3c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a40: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a44: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a48: 00000000 .word 0x00000000 35039a4c: 00000000 .word 0x00000000
The init_sequence_f[] is an array defined in U-Boot v2015.04 source common/board_f.c, which holds a bunch of pointers to critical initialization functions that have to be called during boot. Obviously, the array cannot be all zeros like what objdump tells. And I confirmed that by printing the pointers at run-time as below.
init_sequence_f[0]: 0000000035004280 init_sequence_f[1]: 00000000350042a8 init_sequence_f[2]: 0000000035004380 init_sequence_f[3]: 00000000350042a0 init_sequence_f[4]: 00000000350044b8 init_sequence_f[5]: 0000000035004388 init_sequence_f[6]: 0000000035029538 init_sequence_f[7]: 000000003500675c init_sequence_f[8]: 000000003500447c init_sequence_f[9]: 000000003501d864 init_sequence_f[10]: 0000000035013778 init_sequence_f[11]: 0000000035004398 init_sequence_f[12]: 0000000035028ab8 init_sequence_f[13]: 0000000035004278 init_sequence_f[14]: 0000000035004270 init_sequence_f[15]: 000000003500445c init_sequence_f[16]: 0000000035001f20 init_sequence_f[17]: 0000000035004574 init_sequence_f[18]: 00000000350042b0 init_sequence_f[19]: 00000000350042c4 init_sequence_f[20]: 00000000350042cc init_sequence_f[21]: 00000000350042f8 init_sequence_f[22]: 00000000350044d4 init_sequence_f[23]: 000000003500430c init_sequence_f[24]: 0000000035004314 init_sequence_f[25]: 0000000035004330 init_sequence_f[26]: 0000000035004390 init_sequence_f[27]: 00000000350045bc init_sequence_f[28]: 0000000035004550 init_sequence_f[29]: 0000000035004518 init_sequence_f[30]: 0000000035004378 init_sequence_f[31]: 0000000035004428 init_sequence_f[32]: 00000000350043f0
Dumping an u-boot image built for 32-bit platform with arm-linux-gnueabi-objdump gives correct pointer values for the same array.
17853c7c <init_sequence_f>: 17853c7c: 17805600 strne r5, [r0, r0, lsl #12] 17853c80: 17805620 strne r5, [r0, r0, lsr #12] 17853c84: 1780574c strne r5, [r0, ip, asr #14] 17853c88: 178007ec strne r0, [r0, ip, ror #15] 17853c8c: 1780583c ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x1780583c 17853c90: 17805834 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17805834 17853c94: 1780315c ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x1780315c 17853c98: 178015f4 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x178015f4 17853c9c: 17800890 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17800890 17853ca0: 17801c0c strne r1, [r0, ip, lsl #24] 17853ca4: 178078f8 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x178078f8 17853ca8: 17805808 strne r5, [r0, r8, lsl #16] 17853cac: 17829564 strne r9, [r2, r4, ror #10] 17853cb0: 17816104 strne r6, [r1, r4, lsl #2] 17853cb4: 1783dea4 strne sp, [r3, r4, lsr #29] 17853cb8: 178055f8 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x178055f8 17853cbc: 17801a54 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17801a54 17853cc0: 17805b4c strne r5, [r0, ip, asr #22] 17853cc4: 178057e0 strne r5, [r0, r0, ror #15] 17853cc8: 178057c8 strne r5, [r0, r8, asr #15] 17853ccc: 17802e20 strne r2, [r0, r0, lsr #28] 17853cd0: 17805910 usada8ne r0, r0, r9, r5 17853cd4: 17805628 strne r5, [r0, r8, lsr #12] 17853cd8: 17805640 strne r5, [r0, r0, asr #12] 17853cdc: 17805678 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17805678 17853ce0: 17805680 strne r5, [r0, r0, lsl #13] 17853ce4: 178056b0 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x178056b0 17853ce8: 17805850 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17805850 17853cec: 178056c8 strne r5, [r0, r8, asr #13] 17853cf0: 178056dc ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x178056dc 17853cf4: 178056f8 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x178056f8 17853cf8: 17805768 strne r5, [r0, r8, ror #14] 17853cfc: 17805950 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17805950 17853d00: 178058ec strne r5, [r0, ip, ror #17] 17853d04: 17805894 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17805894 17853d08: 17805744 strne r5, [r0, r4, asr #14] 17853d0c: 17805798 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17805798 17853d10: 17805770 ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0x17805770 17853d14: 00000000 andeq r0, r0, r0
Here are my questions:
Is this only because that ARM 64-bit toolchain doesn't show the real value of the pointers, or there are some linking or run-time magics to get these pointers correct when the binary is actually running?
Is this different behavior between ARM 32-bit and 64-bit toolchain expected? Or did I miss anything on 64-bit toolchain usage?
Any hints or comments are much appreciated.
Can you provide the target name and commit ID that you are building, s well as the version of the toolchain that you are building with? Without being able to reproduce your issue, it's kind of hard to diagnose it.
Thanks, Shawn
Amicalement,
Hi Albert,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:20:18AM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Can you provide the target name and commit ID that you are building, s well as the version of the toolchain that you are building with? Without being able to reproduce your issue, it's kind of hard to diagnose it.
With the explanation from Ard, I understand the thing now. But thanks for the reply anyway.
Shawn
participants (3)
-
Albert ARIBAUD -
Ard Biesheuvel -
Shawn Guo