[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ubi

The following changes since commit a350d0d37d7c113afbd9b0d2cf60ac542007f9e6: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ubi.git master
Simon Kagstrom (1): Handle VID header offset in ubi part command
common/cmd_ubi.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++----- 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:59:56 +0200 Stefan Roese sr@denx.de wrote:
The following changes since commit a350d0d37d7c113afbd9b0d2cf60ac542007f9e6: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ubi.git master
Simon Kagstrom (1): Handle VID header offset in ubi part command
Thanks for applying this! However, I think the "[PATCH 8/8]: Command improvements for ubifs" patch should also be uncontroversial:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055602.html
It's basically just a check for the number of arguments passed and a description of what the command does.
To use ubifs on ARM, I also need the rest of the patch series
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055594.html
but I haven't seen any comments on that so far.
// Simon

On Thursday 09 July 2009 10:16:11 Simon Kagstrom wrote:
The following changes since commit a350d0d37d7c113afbd9b0d2cf60ac542007f9e6: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ubi.git master
Simon Kagstrom (1): Handle VID header offset in ubi part command
Thanks for applying this! However, I think the "[PATCH 8/8]: Command improvements for ubifs" patch should also be uncontroversial:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055602.html
It's basically just a check for the number of arguments passed and a description of what the command does.
Yes. And I already acked it on the list. Please note that I'm "only" the co- custodian for the UBI repository. We have no UBIFS custodian. So it needs to get into mainline via Wolfgang.
To use ubifs on ARM, I also need the rest of the patch series
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055594.html
but I haven't seen any comments on that so far.
No comments doesn't have to be a bad sign. So nobody has something to complain about them. In fact I think your patches are good. So I'll probably send a few acked-by's soon.
Thanks.
Best regards, Stefan
===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office@denx.de =====================================================================

On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:24:42 +0200 Stefan Roese sr@denx.de wrote:
Thanks for applying this! However, I think the "[PATCH 8/8]: Command improvements for ubifs" patch should also be uncontroversial:
Yes. And I already acked it on the list. Please note that I'm "only" the co- custodian for the UBI repository. We have no UBIFS custodian. So it needs to get into mainline via Wolfgang.
Ah, OK! I simply assumed UBI/UBIFS maintenance went together and that it simply got missed.
To use ubifs on ARM, I also need the rest of the patch series
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055594.html
but I haven't seen any comments on that so far.
No comments doesn't have to be a bad sign. So nobody has something to complain about them. In fact I think your patches are good. So I'll probably send a few acked-by's soon.
Well my worry with the series is that it touches pretty much all architectures, which I haven't been able to test. So that is basically where I'd like some feedback.
// Simon

On Thursday 09 July 2009 10:32:02 Simon Kagstrom wrote:
To use ubifs on ARM, I also need the rest of the patch series
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055594.html
but I haven't seen any comments on that so far.
No comments doesn't have to be a bad sign. So nobody has something to complain about them. In fact I think your patches are good. So I'll probably send a few acked-by's soon.
Well my worry with the series is that it touches pretty much all architectures, which I haven't been able to test. So that is basically where I'd like some feedback.
Unfortunately we don't have many boards in mainline U-Boot yet that include UBI/UBIFS till now. So problems in this area might get unnoticed right now.
Did you at least compile-test your patchset on some of the other architectures (PPC, MIPS...)?
Thanks.
Best regards, Stefan
===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office@denx.de =====================================================================

On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:36:58 +0200 Stefan Roese sr@denx.de wrote:
Unfortunately we don't have many boards in mainline U-Boot yet that include UBI/UBIFS till now. So problems in this area might get unnoticed right now.
Did you at least compile-test your patchset on some of the other architectures (PPC, MIPS...)?
Well, the only other cross-compiler I had around is for powerpc. I built for the MPC8349ITX board, and that compiled just fine. But then again PPC already had ffs/fls.
// Simon

On Thursday 09 July 2009 10:49:47 Simon Kagstrom wrote:
Did you at least compile-test your patchset on some of the other architectures (PPC, MIPS...)?
Well, the only other cross-compiler I had around is for powerpc. I built for the MPC8349ITX board, and that compiled just fine. But then again PPC already had ffs/fls.
Well, that's a good sign then. You didn't break the PPC implementation with your patch. ;)
Best regards, Stefan
===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office@denx.de =====================================================================

Dear Stefan Roese,
In message 200907091024.42759.sr@denx.de you wrote:
Yes. And I already acked it on the list. Please note that I'm "only" the co- custodian for the UBI repository. We have no UBIFS custodian. So it needs to get into mainline via Wolfgang.
I see UBIFS and UBI as one topic. Please run it through your UBI repo. Thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk

On Thursday 09 July 2009 12:05:31 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Yes. And I already acked it on the list. Please note that I'm "only" the co- custodian for the UBI repository. We have no UBIFS custodian. So it needs to get into mainline via Wolfgang.
I see UBIFS and UBI as one topic. Please run it through your UBI repo. Thanks.
So I'm promoted from UBI co-custodian to UBIFS custodian? ;)
OK, I'll try to take care of UBIFS related patches for now. Will send an updated ubi/ubifs pull request soon.
Thanks.
Best regards, Stefan
===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office@denx.de =====================================================================
participants (3)
-
Simon Kagstrom
-
Stefan Roese
-
Wolfgang Denk