RE: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] CPM I/O port pin functions for MPC85xx
Murray Jensen wrote:
This patch adds the file "include/asm-ppc/iopin_85xx.h" which mirrors
the
functions in "include/asm-ppc/iopin_8260.h" for manipulating the CPM2
I/O
pins for MPC85xx processors (that have a CPM). Cheers!
I would better cast my vote for the "CPM2 Config" and "MPC85XX ioports" patches from Jon Loeliger.
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@fr...> To: u-boot-users <u-boot-users@li...> Subject: [U-Boot-Users] CPM2 Config Patches Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 11:58:50 -0600
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@fr...> To: u-boot-users <u-boot-users@li...> Subject: [U-Boot-Users] MPC85XX ioports patch Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 12:03:25 -0600
Talking about MPC85xx patches, it looks like they're filtered out in the U-Boot CVS while others patches still find their way. Besides the patches above, the MPC85xx platforms do need the CFI patch from Jon/Freescale. The TLB fix is a nice to have too, etc.
Thanks all for your efforts
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:08:11 +0200, "Fillod Stephane" writes:
I would better cast my vote for the "CPM2 Config" and "MPC85XX ioports" patches from Jon Loeliger.
I have no objection to the patches you mention above - I believe the patch I posted and the two you mention should be able to co-exist.
My patch is fairly benign - its purpose is to allow code that already exists in U-Boot for the 8260 platform to also work on the 8560 platform (since the two share the CPM2 in common).
I need this because we have a new Hymod board based on the 8560 which is almost identical to our old 8260-based board - and I re-use most of the old code for the new board.
In fact, both the old board port (now called hymod1) and the new board port (hymod2) use the same board directory ("board/hymod") when building. I will be posting the Hymod board port changes soon. Cheers! Murray...
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 05:08, Fillod Stephane wrote:
I would better cast my vote for the "CPM2 Config" and "MPC85XX ioports" patches from Jon Loeliger.
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@fr...> To: u-boot-users <u-boot-users@li...> Subject: [U-Boot-Users] CPM2 Config Patches Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 11:58:50 -0600 From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@fr...> To: u-boot-users <u-boot-users@li...> Subject: [U-Boot-Users] MPC85XX ioports patch Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 12:03:25 -0600
Good call.
Talking about MPC85xx patches, it looks like they're filtered out in the U-Boot CVS while others patches still find their way.
That's a good observation. What is happening here and can I do something to "fix" or help the situation?
Besides the patches above, the MPC85xx platforms do need the CFI patch from Jon/Freescale. The TLB fix is a nice to have too, etc.
Indeed. And in the meantime, it is causing me to have to hand-support multiple users as well.
Any chance we can help get some of this resolved? Do we need to convert to GIT or so? Would that help?
Thanks! jdl
In message 1121182110.17872.4.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com you wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 05:08, Fillod Stephane wrote:
I would better cast my vote for the "CPM2 Config" and "MPC85XX ioports" patches from Jon Loeliger.
...
Good call.
Thanks.
Talking about MPC85xx patches, it looks like they're filtered out in the U-Boot CVS while others patches still find their way.
That's a good observation. What is happening here and can I do something to "fix" or help the situation?
Nothing was filtered out, at least not intentionally. Actualkly all my patch processing came to a halt some time ago when I decided to spend some time on thinking about more efficient ways for the U-Boot development cycle first. I think we will have a git tree soon. I just need a little more exercise with all the new (and quickly changing) tools.
Indeed. And in the meantime, it is causing me to have to hand-support multiple users as well.
I cannot parse that. What have multiple users to do with U-Boot?
Any chance we can help get some of this resolved? Do we need to convert to GIT or so? Would that help?
If you want you can go ahead and create a git tree from the CVS server at SF, using something like
git cvsimport -d :pserver:anonymous@cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/u-boo -C u-boot u-boot
If you then provide an URL to pull from and indicate which patches in my queue this bsoletes this might indeed help. Note that all the other rules for patch submission are still in place, and I will definitely reject pulls for formal reasons.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
participants (4)
-
Fillod Stephane -
Jon Loeliger -
Murray.Jensen＠csiro.au -
Wolfgang Denk