[U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX31: Specify maintainers for i.MX31-based boards
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski lg@denx.de
---
This patch should be applied after SMDK6400 is merged, which will, probably, get in with the nand tree. Please comment any objections:-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 0cab77a..343393c 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -198,6 +198,11 @@ Joe Hamman joe.hamman@embeddedspecialties.com sbc8548 MPC8548 sbc8641d MPC8641D
+Sascha Hauer s.hauer@pengutronix.de + + imx31_phycore i.MX31 + imx31_litekit i.MX31 + Klaus Heydeck heydeck@kieback-peter.de
KUP4K MPC855 @@ -243,6 +248,7 @@ Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovetski@gmx.de
linkstation MPC8241 SMDK6400 S3C6400 + mx31ads i.MX31
Dave Liu daveliu@freescale.com
Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
In message Pine.LNX.4.64.0808131802390.6465@axis700.grange you wrote:
This patch should be applied after SMDK6400 is merged, which will, probably, get in with the nand tree. Please comment any objections:-)
SMD6400 is ARM code, so it must come from the ARM custodian.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
In message Pine.LNX.4.64.0808131802390.6465@axis700.grange you wrote:
This patch should be applied after SMDK6400 is merged, which will, probably, get in with the nand tree. Please comment any objections:-)
SMD6400 is ARM code, so it must come from the ARM custodian.
It is based on the nand/testing branch, so, they will not apply to the ARM tree, not without pulling the nand tree first. Or, even if they will apply, it won't work. Wouldn't it be enough if the ARM-custodian Acks them and they get pulled into the NAND-tree?
Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office@denx.de
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 06:48:18PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
SMD6400 is ARM code, so it must come from the ARM custodian.
It is based on the nand/testing branch, so, they will not apply to the ARM tree, not without pulling the nand tree first. Or, even if they will apply, it won't work. Wouldn't it be enough if the ARM-custodian Acks them and they get pulled into the NAND-tree?
Wolfgang has pulled nand-flash, so all the ARM custodian needs to pull is Wolfgang's tree.
-Scott
Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
In message Pine.LNX.4.64.0808131839430.7458@axis700.grange you wrote:
SMD6400 is ARM code, so it must come from the ARM custodian.
It is based on the nand/testing branch, so, they will not apply to the
NAND testing was merged into mainline yesterday, so ARM should be happy with that by now.
ARM tree, not without pulling the nand tree first. Or, even if they will apply, it won't work. Wouldn't it be enough if the ARM-custodian Acks them and they get pulled into the NAND-tree?
It makes no sense to squeeze a 95% ARM / 5% NAND bundle through the NAND repo.
Actually you should have split up your port into orthogonal patches that could go through both repos independently.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
In message Pine.LNX.4.64.0808131802390.6465@axis700.grange you wrote:
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski lg@denx.de
This patch should be applied after SMDK6400 is merged, which will, probably, get in with the nand tree. Please comment any objections:-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
Applied, after fixing the incorrect placement of the entries.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
participants (3)
-
Guennadi Liakhovetski -
Scott Wood -
Wolfgang Denk