RE: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
The 5910 for all practically purposes is the 1510. I have seen a doc somewhere, not sure if I captured it or not.
Basically, the difference is the way the parts are tested and sorted. The 1510 parts are speed rated, and you can get up to a 168MHx part. The 5910 parts are not and its only guaranteed up to 150MHz, but its likely many will run at 168. The 1510 also "claims" support for some functionality which the 5910 will not admit to having. The issue there is support and validation. 5910 parts will not be validated for everything a 1510 will be.
I use a mix of both types of chips on development boards. I use their u-boot images interchangeably....I have set my timings back to 150MHz as the thing I've been working on will get parts stamped as 5910 not 1510.
Regards,
Richard W.
-----Original Message----- From: u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Matthew S. McClintock Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:30 PM To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
Has anyone done any work for the omap5910 cpu for u-boot? I understand its extremely similar to the omap1510 cpu. Does anyone have any code or pointers to how the two cpu's are different?
Thanks, Matthew
-- Matthew S. McClintock mattsm@arlut.utexas.edu
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
Currently we are using the JTAG interface on our development board with Code Composer on Windows. I would like to switch to the BDI2000 I am used to debugging from with GNU tools on Linux. Based on information from Albatron's web page there is support for the ARM9TDMI cpu on the BDI2000, I am curious if anyone has a bdi2000 config for this cpu?
Thanks, Matthew
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 13:55, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
The 5910 for all practically purposes is the 1510. I have seen a doc somewhere, not sure if I captured it or not.
Basically, the difference is the way the parts are tested and sorted. The 1510 parts are speed rated, and you can get up to a 168MHx part. The 5910 parts are not and its only guaranteed up to 150MHz, but its likely many will run at 168. The 1510 also "claims" support for some functionality which the 5910 will not admit to having. The issue there is support and validation. 5910 parts will not be validated for everything a 1510 will be.
I use a mix of both types of chips on development boards. I use their u-boot images interchangeably....I have set my timings back to 150MHz as the thing I've been working on will get parts stamped as 5910 not 1510.
Regards,
Richard W.
-----Original Message----- From: u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Matthew S. McClintock Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:30 PM To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
Has anyone done any work for the omap5910 cpu for u-boot? I understand its extremely similar to the omap1510 cpu. Does anyone have any code or pointers to how the two cpu's are different?
Thanks, Matthew
-- Matthew S. McClintock mattsm@arlut.utexas.edu
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
In message 1067546224.26405.29.camel@chuck.arlut.utexas.edu you wrote:
Currently we are using the JTAG interface on our development board with Code Composer on Windows. I would like to switch to the BDI2000 I am used to debugging from with GNU tools on Linux. Based on information from Albatron's web page there is support for the ARM9TDMI cpu on the BDI2000, I am curious if anyone has a bdi2000 config for this cpu?
You get example config files with the software from Abatron.
Also, our collection of BDI2000 config files contains some ARM9TDMI examples; see for example ftp://ftp.denx.de/pub/BDI2000/smdk2400.cfg ftp://ftp.denx.de/pub/BDI2000/trab.cfg
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message 1067546224.26405.29.camel@chuck.arlut.utexas.edu you wrote:
Currently we are using the JTAG interface on our development board with Code Composer on Windows. I would like to switch to the BDI2000 I am used to debugging from with GNU tools on Linux. Based on information from Albatron's web page there is support for the ARM9TDMI cpu on the BDI2000, I am curious if anyone has a bdi2000 config for this cpu?
You get example config files with the software from Abatron.
True, in fact, it appears that inno925.cfg and reg925t.def are included in recent armGDB versions.
-- Regards, George
Also, our collection of BDI2000 config files contains some ARM9TDMI examples; see for example ftp://ftp.denx.de/pub/BDI2000/smdk2400.cfg ftp://ftp.denx.de/pub/BDI2000/trab.cfg
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
participants (4)
-
George G. Davis -
Matthew S. McClintock -
Wolfgang Denk -
Woodruff, Richard