[U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: omap: ulpi: fix ulpi reading/writing functions

Fix ulpi reading and writing function. * Both functions need to have the bit31 setted. * Right now uboot use 0 to enumerate port 1 and 1 to enumerate port 2 and so on. Omap code use 1 for port 1 and 2 for port 2. Add a +1 fix the problem
Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi michael@amarulasolutions.com --- drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c b/drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c index 2a42033..4db7fa4 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c +++ b/drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int ulpi_request(struct ulpi_viewport *ulpi_vp, u32 value)
int ulpi_write(struct ulpi_viewport *ulpi_vp, u8 *reg, u32 value) { - u32 val = (OMAP_ULPI_START | (ulpi_vp->port_num & 0xf) << 24) | + u32 val = OMAP_ULPI_START | (((ulpi_vp->port_num + 1) & 0xf) << 24) | OMAP_ULPI_WR_OPSEL | ((u32)reg << 16) | (value & 0xff);
return ulpi_request(ulpi_vp, val); @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ int ulpi_write(struct ulpi_viewport *ulpi_vp, u8 *reg, u32 value) u32 ulpi_read(struct ulpi_viewport *ulpi_vp, u8 *reg) { int err; - u32 val = ((ulpi_vp->port_num & 0xf) << 24) | + u32 val = OMAP_ULPI_START | (((ulpi_vp->port_num + 1) & 0xf) << 24) | OMAP_ULPI_RD_OPSEL | ((u32)reg << 16);
err = ulpi_request(ulpi_vp, val);

Hi Michael,
A minor suggestion to clarify the explanation (its HW that requires +1):
On 10/06/13 17:23, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
Fix ulpi reading and writing function.
- Both functions need to have the bit31 setted.
- Right now uboot use 0 to enumerate port 1 and 1 to enumerate port 2 and so on. Omap code use 1 for port 1 and 2 for port 2.
---------------------------------^ The OMAP INSNREG05_ULPI register expects a value of 1 for Port 1 and of 2 for Port 2 in the PORTSEL field.
Add a +1 fix the problem
Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi michael@amarulasolutions.com
drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c b/drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c index 2a42033..4db7fa4 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c +++ b/drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int ulpi_request(struct ulpi_viewport *ulpi_vp, u32 value)
int ulpi_write(struct ulpi_viewport *ulpi_vp, u8 *reg, u32 value) {
- u32 val = (OMAP_ULPI_START | (ulpi_vp->port_num & 0xf) << 24) |
u32 val = OMAP_ULPI_START | (((ulpi_vp->port_num + 1) & 0xf) << 24) | OMAP_ULPI_WR_OPSEL | ((u32)reg << 16) | (value & 0xff);
return ulpi_request(ulpi_vp, val);
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ int ulpi_write(struct ulpi_viewport *ulpi_vp, u8 *reg, u32 value) u32 ulpi_read(struct ulpi_viewport *ulpi_vp, u8 *reg) { int err;
- u32 val = ((ulpi_vp->port_num & 0xf) << 24) |
u32 val = OMAP_ULPI_START | (((ulpi_vp->port_num + 1) & 0xf) << 24) | OMAP_ULPI_RD_OPSEL | ((u32)reg << 16);
err = ulpi_request(ulpi_vp, val);
As for the patch itself, tested on a custom OMAP5430 board with a TUSB1210 ULPI PHY on USBB1:
Tested-by: Lubomir Popov lpopov@mm-sol.com

Hi Michael,
On 10/06/13 17:23, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
Fix ulpi reading and writing function.
- Both functions need to have the bit31 setted.
- Right now uboot use 0 to enumerate port 1 and 1 to enumerate port 2 and so on. Omap code use 1 for port 1 and 2 for port 2. Add a +1 fix the problem
Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi michael@amarulasolutions.com
drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c b/drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c index 2a42033..4db7fa4 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c +++ b/drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int ulpi_request(struct ulpi_viewport *ulpi_vp, u32 value)
I now see that you have not rebased on a clean u-boot-ti/master. This patch is incremental to your older version, but without any notification about this, and without version info in the subject. I guess you shall have to repost.
Best regards, Lubomir

On 06/10/13 17:23, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
Fix ulpi reading and writing function.
- Both functions need to have the bit31 setted.
- Right now uboot use 0 to enumerate port 1 and 1 to enumerate port 2 and so on. Omap code use 1 for port 1 and 2 for port 2. Add a +1 fix the problem
Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi michael@amarulasolutions.com
Acked-by: Igor Grinberg grinberg@compulab.co.il
drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c b/drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c index 2a42033..4db7fa4 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c +++ b/drivers/usb/ulpi/omap-ulpi-viewport.c @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int ulpi_request(struct ulpi_viewport *ulpi_vp, u32 value)
int ulpi_write(struct ulpi_viewport *ulpi_vp, u8 *reg, u32 value) {
- u32 val = (OMAP_ULPI_START | (ulpi_vp->port_num & 0xf) << 24) |
u32 val = OMAP_ULPI_START | (((ulpi_vp->port_num + 1) & 0xf) << 24) | OMAP_ULPI_WR_OPSEL | ((u32)reg << 16) | (value & 0xff);
return ulpi_request(ulpi_vp, val);
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ int ulpi_write(struct ulpi_viewport *ulpi_vp, u8 *reg, u32 value) u32 ulpi_read(struct ulpi_viewport *ulpi_vp, u8 *reg) { int err;
- u32 val = ((ulpi_vp->port_num & 0xf) << 24) |
u32 val = OMAP_ULPI_START | (((ulpi_vp->port_num + 1) & 0xf) << 24) | OMAP_ULPI_RD_OPSEL | ((u32)reg << 16);
err = ulpi_request(ulpi_vp, val);

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 04:23:33PM +0200, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
Fix ulpi reading and writing function.
- Both functions need to have the bit31 setted.
- Right now uboot use 0 to enumerate port 1 and 1 to enumerate port 2 and so on. Omap code use 1 for port 1 and 2 for port 2. Add a +1 fix the problem
Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi michael@amarulasolutions.com Tested-by: Lubomir Popov lpopov@mm-sol.com Acked-by: Igor Grinberg grinberg@compulab.co.il
Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
participants (4)
-
Igor Grinberg
-
Lubomir Popov
-
Michael Trimarchi
-
Tom Rini