Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 4/3] i.MX6DQ/DLS: remove unused pad declarations
[Re-sending to the list as the original address was incorrect]
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Fabio Estevam festevam@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Eric Nelson eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com wrote:
Personally, I think it is better to remove everything that is not used, and add it later when it is really needed.
It seems like we mostly have consensus here.
Fabio/Shawn/Tapani, can we get a head nod?
Sounds good for me as well.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:35:13PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
[Re-sending to the list as the original address was incorrect]
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Fabio Estevam festevam@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Eric Nelson eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com wrote:
Personally, I think it is better to remove everything that is not used, and add it later when it is really needed.
It seems like we mostly have consensus here.
Fabio/Shawn/Tapani, can we get a head nod?
Agree.
Shawn
On 10/10/2013 07:10 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:35:13PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
[Re-sending to the list as the original address was incorrect]
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Fabio Estevam festevam@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Eric Nelson eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com wrote:
Personally, I think it is better to remove everything that is not used, and add it later when it is really needed.
It seems like we mostly have consensus here.
Fabio/Shawn/Tapani, can we get a head nod?
Thanks Shawn (and Fabio).
I'll work up a cleaner patch-set without the RFC.
participants (3)
-
Eric Nelson -
Fabio Estevam -
Shawn Guo