Mike Frysinger vapier@gentoo.org
From: Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de Fcc: +U-Boot Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/8] sandbox: fdt: Add support for CONFIG_OF_CONTROL MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit In-reply-to: 1329349878-16664-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org References: 1329349878-16664-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org Comments: In-reply-to Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org message dated "Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:51:11 -0800."
Dear Simon,
In message 1329349878-16664-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org you wrote:
This adds support for a controlling fdt, mirroring the ARM implementation.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Changes in v3:
- Use #if defined()..#elif defined, instead of #ifdef..#elif defined
arch/sandbox/include/asm/global_data.h | 1 + arch/sandbox/lib/board.c | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
I have nearly 50 sandbox related patches in my queue, many based on stuff that was posted before close of the merge window, and I have to admit that I lost track which of these are supposed to be applied, which were merely for RFC, or which have abandonded.
Could you please summarize what is supposed to go in for this release, and what should go into the "next" branch?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 16:29:12 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
I have nearly 50 sandbox related patches in my queue, many based on stuff that was posted before close of the merge window, and I have to admit that I lost track which of these are supposed to be applied, which were merely for RFC, or which have abandonded.
Could you please summarize what is supposed to go in for this release, and what should go into the "next" branch?
i've been maintaining things in my blackfin repo in the sandbox branch. all the patches in patchwork should be labeled appropriately. i don't think there's anything that needs to be merged directly by you as i'll be sending a pull request in the next merge window.
where is your queue ? your inbox ? -mike
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201203061702.56436.vapier@gentoo.org you wrote:
i've been maintaining things in my blackfin repo in the sandbox branch. all the patches in patchwork should be labeled appropriately. i don't think there's anything that needs to be merged directly by you as i'll be sending a pull request in the next merge window.
This V2 series was well in the merge window:
01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/8] sandbox: fdt: Add support for CONFIG_OF_CONTROL http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122317 01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/8] sandbox: config: Enable fdt and snprintf() options http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122318 01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/8] sandbox: gpio: Add basic driver for simulating GPIOs http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122321 01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/8] sandbox: Enable GPIO driver http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122319 01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/8] sandbox: Add concept of sandbox state http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122320 01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 6/8] sandbox: Allow processing instead of or before main loop http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122323 01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/8] sandbox: Add flags for open() call http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122322 01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 8/8] sandbox: Add basic command line parsing http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122324
So should this not go into the upcoming release? I would expect it should.
where is your queue ? your inbox ?
Yes - I find this still to be way more efficient that working with the slow web interface of PW, and JK still has not incoreporated the (long available) mail interface patches.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201203061702.56436.vapier@gentoo.org you wrote:
i've been maintaining things in my blackfin repo in the sandbox branch. all the patches in patchwork should be labeled appropriately. i don't think there's anything that needs to be merged directly by you as i'll be sending a pull request in the next merge window.
This V2 series was well in the merge window:
01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/8] sandbox: fdt: Add support for CONFIG_OF_CONTROL http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122317 01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/8] sandbox: config: Enable fdt and snprintf() options http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122318 01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/8] sandbox: gpio: Add basic driver for simulating GPIOs http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122321 01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/8] sandbox: Enable GPIO driver http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122319 01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/8] sandbox: Add concept of sandbox state http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122320 01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 6/8] sandbox: Allow processing instead of or before main loop http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122323 01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/8] sandbox: Add flags for open() call http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122322
The above patches should be in Mike's tree.
01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 8/8] sandbox: Add basic command line parsing http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122324
Mike expanded this one significantly - I just acked it. Might stretch the definition of 'inside merge window'?
Mike can you please send a pull for these?
So should this not go into the upcoming release? I would expect it should.
where is your queue ? your inbox ?
Yes - I find this still to be way more efficient that working with the slow web interface of PW, and JK still has not incoreporated the (long available) mail interface patches.
Yes I just cleaned up mine...it would be nice if you could select multiple patches at the top level and perform actions on them.
Regards, Simon
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
-- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de "Any excuse will serve a tyrant." - Aesop
Dear Simon Glass,
In message CAPnjgZ2tGqTRfFOaKyySUrQxMO3_4qfX7ewg-XFUcuqZtP=6Ew@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 8/8] sandbox: Add > basic command line parsing http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122324
Mike expanded this one significantly - I just acked it. Might stretch the definition of 'inside merge window'?
Initial patch was within merge window; we usually accapt updates, so why not here.
Yes I just cleaned up mine...it would be nice if you could select multiple patches at the top level and perform actions on them.
See the "Create bundle" function - eventually this is what you are looking for?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
Dear Simon Glass,
In message CAPnjgZ2tGqTRfFOaKyySUrQxMO3_4qfX7ewg-XFUcuqZtP=6Ew@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
01/10 Simon Glass [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 8/8] sandbox: Add > basic command line parsing http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122324
Mike expanded this one significantly - I just acked it. Might stretch the definition of 'inside merge window'?
Initial patch was within merge window; we usually accapt updates, so why not here.
OK. It will be good to have this in.
Yes I just cleaned up mine...it would be nice if you could select multiple patches at the top level and perform actions on them.
See the "Create bundle" function - eventually this is what you are looking for?
Yes I can create a bundle, just not sure how I can then mark everything in the bundle as 'archived' or change its state.
Regards, Simon
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
-- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de A modem is a baudy house.
On Thursday 08 March 2012 01:37:08 Simon Glass wrote:
Yes I just cleaned up mine...it would be nice if you could select multiple patches at the top level and perform actions on them.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ldopaogbegnhconlboidfjcmidndkbeg -mike
On Wednesday 07 March 2012 06:25:15 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
So should this not go into the upcoming release? I would expect it should.
ok, i can put together a branch for you to pull
Yes - I find this still to be way more efficient that working with the slow web interface of PW, and JK still has not incoreporated the (long available) mail interface patches.
for the sandbox ones, you can just mark them all "handled" as i've done that. if something has been missed, Simon can bug me. -mike
participants (3)
-
Mike Frysinger -
Simon Glass -
Wolfgang Denk