[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] doc: README.mxs: Add instruction to install 'libssl-dev'
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@freescale.com
Since commit bce883707 (ARM: mxs: tools: Add mkimage support for MXS bootstream) the following build error is seen when doing a MAKEALL build:
$ ./MAKEALL mx28evk Configuring for mx28evk - Board: mx28evk, Options: ENV_IS_IN_MMC mxsimage.c:18:25: fatal error: openssl/evp.h: No such file or directory
Add an entry about the need of installing the 'libssl-dev' package.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@freescale.com --- Changes since v1: - Do not remove the 'elftosb' text.
doc/README.mxs | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/README.mxs b/doc/README.mxs index 5d9e72f..1e5bc5c 100644 --- a/doc/README.mxs +++ b/doc/README.mxs @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ copy the binary by hand: Make sure the "elftosb" binary can be found in your $PATH, in this case this means "/usr/local/bin/" has to be in your $PATH.
+Install the 'libssl-dev' package as well. On a Ubuntu-based distribution, this +package can be installed as follows: + + $ sudo apt-get install libssl-dev + 2) Compiling U-Boot for a MXS based board -------------------------------------------
Dear Fabio Estevam,
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@freescale.com
Since commit bce883707 (ARM: mxs: tools: Add mkimage support for MXS bootstream) the following build error is seen when doing a MAKEALL build:
$ ./MAKEALL mx28evk Configuring for mx28evk - Board: mx28evk, Options: ENV_IS_IN_MMC mxsimage.c:18:25: fatal error: openssl/evp.h: No such file or directory
Add an entry about the need of installing the 'libssl-dev' package.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@freescale.com
Changes since v1:
- Do not remove the 'elftosb' text.
doc/README.mxs | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/README.mxs b/doc/README.mxs index 5d9e72f..1e5bc5c 100644 --- a/doc/README.mxs +++ b/doc/README.mxs @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ copy the binary by hand: Make sure the "elftosb" binary can be found in your $PATH, in this case this means "/usr/local/bin/" has to be in your $PATH.
+Install the 'libssl-dev' package as well. On a Ubuntu-based distribution, this +package can be installed as follows:
- $ sudo apt-get install libssl-dev
Since when is Ubuntu not a Debian based distro ? :-( I think you should stick with the roots here, use Debian.
- Compiling U-Boot for a MXS based board
Best regards, Marek Vasut
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
Since when is Ubuntu not a Debian based distro ? :-( I think you should stick with the roots here, use Debian.
Yes, I wrote "Debian-based" in v1. The change here was not on purpose, so I can fix it in v3.
Actually, I have been thinking about this fix: wouldn't it be better to copy the 'openssl/evp.h' header into U-boot tool directory to avoid people getting failures with MAKEALL if they do not have libssl-dev installed?
Dear Fabio Estevam,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
Since when is Ubuntu not a Debian based distro ? :-( I think you should stick with the roots here, use Debian.
Yes, I wrote "Debian-based" in v1. The change here was not on purpose, so I can fix it in v3.
Actually, I have been thinking about this fix: wouldn't it be better to copy the 'openssl/evp.h' header into U-boot tool directory to avoid people getting failures with MAKEALL if they do not have libssl-dev installed?
No, because they won't be able to link without the dev package anyway.
Best regards, Marek Vasut
On 16/09/2013 16:19, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
Since when is Ubuntu not a Debian based distro ? :-( I think you should stick with the roots here, use Debian.
Yes, I wrote "Debian-based" in v1. The change here was not on purpose, so I can fix it in v3.
Actually, I have been thinking about this fix: wouldn't it be better to copy the 'openssl/evp.h' header into U-boot tool directory to avoid people getting failures with MAKEALL if they do not have libssl-dev installed?
I disagree : it is not different if another include file is missing, or the host is not installed. Then the hint is to install build-essential (Ubuntu) or all packages, not to move them inside u-boot.
Regards, Stefano
Dear Stefano Babic,
On 16/09/2013 16:19, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
Since when is Ubuntu not a Debian based distro ? :-( I think you should stick with the roots here, use Debian.
Yes, I wrote "Debian-based" in v1. The change here was not on purpose, so I can fix it in v3.
Actually, I have been thinking about this fix: wouldn't it be better to copy the 'openssl/evp.h' header into U-boot tool directory to avoid people getting failures with MAKEALL if they do not have libssl-dev installed?
I disagree : it is not different if another include file is missing, or the host is not installed. Then the hint is to install build-essential (Ubuntu) or all packages, not to move them inside u-boot.
Hey, build-essential is also Debian (lol) ! ;-)
Best regards, Marek Vasut
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
Dear Stefano Babic,
On 16/09/2013 16:19, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
Since when is Ubuntu not a Debian based distro ? :-( I think you should stick with the roots here, use Debian.
Yes, I wrote "Debian-based" in v1. The change here was not on purpose, so I can fix it in v3.
Actually, I have been thinking about this fix: wouldn't it be better to copy the 'openssl/evp.h' header into U-boot tool directory to avoid people getting failures with MAKEALL if they do not have libssl-dev installed?
I disagree : it is not different if another include file is missing, or the host is not installed. Then the hint is to install build-essential (Ubuntu) or all packages, not to move them inside u-boot.
Hey, build-essential is also Debian (lol) ! ;-)
Debian +1 :-)
participants (4)
-
Fabio Estevam -
Marek Vasut -
Otavio Salvador -
Stefano Babic