[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx
Wolfgang Denk,
Please pull:
The following changes since commit 1aada9cd643567d351667138851e9231ccfa245a: Wolfgang Denk (1): Fix all linker scripts for older binutils versions (pre-2.16)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc83xx.git master
Heiko Schocher (1): mpc83xx: add missing CSCONFIG_ODT_WR_CFG for 832x CPUs
Kim Phillips (3): mpc83xx: tqm8349 - remove pci & flash window conflict mpc83xx: mpc8377erdb - change DDR settings to those from latest bsp mpc83xx: accommodate larger kernel sizes by default
Paul Gortmaker (2): mpc83xx: sbc8349 - make enabling PCI more user friendly mpc83xx: mpc8349 - delete unused SYS_MID_FLASH_JUMP
Makefile | 19 ++++++++++++++- doc/README.sbc8349 | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- include/configs/MPC8313ERDB.h | 4 +- include/configs/MPC8315ERDB.h | 4 +- include/configs/MPC8323ERDB.h | 4 +- include/configs/MPC832XEMDS.h | 4 +- include/configs/MPC8349EMDS.h | 5 +-- include/configs/MPC8360EMDS.h | 4 +- include/configs/MPC837XEMDS.h | 4 +- include/configs/MPC837XERDB.h | 10 ++++---- include/configs/TQM834x.h | 2 +- include/configs/sbc8349.h | 27 ++++++++++++--------- include/configs/vme8349.h | 5 +-- include/mpc83xx.h | 3 ++ 14 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
Thanks,
Kim
Dear Kim Phillips,
In message 20090821171450.973ec854.kim.phillips@freescale.com you wrote:
Wolfgang Denk,
Please pull:
The following changes since commit 1aada9cd643567d351667138851e9231ccfa245a: Wolfgang Denk (1): Fix all linker scripts for older binutils versions (pre-2.16)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc83xx.git master
Heiko Schocher (1): mpc83xx: add missing CSCONFIG_ODT_WR_CFG for 832x CPUs
Umm.... please do not edit the Subject line of the commit messages. At least, please tell me explicitly if you do. The reason is that I cannot find any such patch anywhere - because the real Subject was "83xx: add..."
Kim Phillips (3): mpc83xx: tqm8349 - remove pci & flash window conflict mpc83xx: mpc8377erdb - change DDR settings to those from latest bsp mpc83xx: accommodate larger kernel sizes by default
Paul Gortmaker (2): mpc83xx: sbc8349 - make enabling PCI more user friendly mpc83xx: mpc8349 - delete unused SYS_MID_FLASH_JUMP
Makefile | 19 ++++++++++++++- doc/README.sbc8349 | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- include/configs/MPC8313ERDB.h | 4 +- include/configs/MPC8315ERDB.h | 4 +- include/configs/MPC8323ERDB.h | 4 +- include/configs/MPC832XEMDS.h | 4 +- include/configs/MPC8349EMDS.h | 5 +-- include/configs/MPC8360EMDS.h | 4 +- include/configs/MPC837XEMDS.h | 4 +- include/configs/MPC837XERDB.h | 10 ++++---- include/configs/TQM834x.h | 2 +- include/configs/sbc8349.h | 27 ++++++++++++--------- include/configs/vme8349.h | 5 +-- include/mpc83xx.h | 3 ++ 14 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:26:57 +0200 Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
Heiko Schocher (1): mpc83xx: add missing CSCONFIG_ODT_WR_CFG for 832x CPUs
Umm.... please do not edit the Subject line of the commit messages. At least, please tell me explicitly if you do. The reason is that I cannot find any such patch anywhere - because the real Subject was "83xx: add..."
sounds like I shouldn't be prefixing mpc83xx patch subjects with mpc83xx for consistency. I'd rather keep that habit myself, but if that's what you prefer..
Kim
Dear Kim Phillips,
In message 20090821174533.d26d421b.kim.phillips@freescale.com you wrote:
Heiko Schocher (1): mpc83xx: add missing CSCONFIG_ODT_WR_CFG for 832x CPUs
Umm.... please do not edit the Subject line of the commit messages. At least, please tell me explicitly if you do. The reason is that I cannot find any such patch anywhere - because the real Subject was "83xx: add..."
sounds like I shouldn't be prefixing mpc83xx patch subjects with mpc83xx for consistency. I'd rather keep that habit myself, but if that's what you prefer..
I like consistency, too. But for me it's also important to be able to associate commits to the actual postings on the mailing list. The best solution would be if the sumbitters could already use such Subject: lines.
Maybe we should formulate such a rule / requirement / wish ?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:00:36 +0200 Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
Dear Kim Phillips,
In message 20090821174533.d26d421b.kim.phillips@freescale.com you wrote:
Heiko Schocher (1): mpc83xx: add missing CSCONFIG_ODT_WR_CFG for 832x CPUs
Umm.... please do not edit the Subject line of the commit messages. At least, please tell me explicitly if you do. The reason is that I cannot find any such patch anywhere - because the real Subject was "83xx: add..."
sounds like I shouldn't be prefixing mpc83xx patch subjects with mpc83xx for consistency. I'd rather keep that habit myself, but if that's what you prefer..
I like consistency, too. But for me it's also important to be able to associate commits to the actual postings on the mailing list. The best solution would be if the sumbitters could already use such Subject: lines.
Maybe we should formulate such a rule / requirement / wish ?
you can try, but most of the patches that come in for 83xx are fine, just without that 'mpc83xx: ' up front (esp. the 'mpc' part).
Personally, I'm in favour of dynamic learning and adapting of our contributors, rather than establishing hard rules - I don't want to have to reject a patch for something so easy to fix.
Might I suggest we use a more sophisticated patch tracking tool than sorting inboxes, such as patchworks?
Kim
On Aug 24, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:00:36 +0200 Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
Dear Kim Phillips,
In message 20090821174533.d26d421b.kim.phillips@freescale.com you wrote:
Heiko Schocher (1): mpc83xx: add missing CSCONFIG_ODT_WR_CFG for 832x CPUs
Umm.... please do not edit the Subject line of the commit messages. At least, please tell me explicitly if you do. The reason is that I cannot find any such patch anywhere - because the real Subject was "83xx: add..."
sounds like I shouldn't be prefixing mpc83xx patch subjects with mpc83xx for consistency. I'd rather keep that habit myself, but if that's what you prefer..
I like consistency, too. But for me it's also important to be able to associate commits to the actual postings on the mailing list. The best solution would be if the sumbitters could already use such Subject: lines.
Maybe we should formulate such a rule / requirement / wish ?
you can try, but most of the patches that come in for 83xx are fine, just without that 'mpc83xx: ' up front (esp. the 'mpc' part).
Personally, I'm in favour of dynamic learning and adapting of our contributors, rather than establishing hard rules - I don't want to have to reject a patch for something so easy to fix.
Might I suggest we use a more sophisticated patch tracking tool than sorting inboxes, such as patchworks?
I'm in agreement w/Kim on this. I've been doing similar commit header editing and I've been doing on the kernel side for sometime. It seems easier to look at using patchworks (we can probably use the setup that the ozlabs.org guys have already if we want).
- k
participants (3)
-
Kim Phillips -
Kumar Gala -
Wolfgang Denk