[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] arm: stm32f4: fix a bug when only first sector gets erased
flash_lock call is inside a for loop, so after the first iteration flash is locked and no more sectors can be erased. Move flash_lock out of the loop.
Signed-off-by: Vadzim Dambrouski pftbest@gmail.com ---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/stm32f4/flash.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/stm32f4/flash.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/stm32f4/flash.c index e5c6111..ae63790 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/stm32f4/flash.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/stm32f4/flash.c @@ -114,9 +114,9 @@ int flash_erase(flash_info_t *info, int first, int last) ;
clrbits_le32(&STM32_FLASH->cr, STM32_FLASH_CR_SER); - stm32f4_flash_lock(1); }
+ stm32f4_flash_lock(1); return 0; }
Old sector number is not being cleared from FLASH_CR register. For example when first erased sector was 001 and then you want to erase sector 010, sector 011 gets erased instead. This patch clears old sector number from FLASH_CR register before a new one is written.
Signed-off-by: Vadzim Dambrouski pftbest@gmail.com ---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/stm32f4/flash.c | 3 +++ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-stm32f4/stm32.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/stm32f4/flash.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/stm32f4/flash.c index ae63790..dd058bd 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/stm32f4/flash.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/stm32f4/flash.c @@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ int flash_erase(flash_info_t *info, int first, int last) while (readl(&STM32_FLASH->sr) & STM32_FLASH_SR_BSY) ;
+ /* clear old sector number before writing a new one */ + clrbits_le32(&STM32_FLASH->cr, STM32_FLASH_CR_SNB_MASK); + if (bank == 0) { setbits_le32(&STM32_FLASH->cr, (i << STM32_FLASH_CR_SNB_OFFSET)); diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-stm32f4/stm32.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-stm32f4/stm32.h index 3ed3801..7ca6dc3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-stm32f4/stm32.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-stm32f4/stm32.h @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ struct stm32_flash_regs { #define STM32_FLASH_CR_STRT (1 << 16) #define STM32_FLASH_CR_LOCK (1 << 31) #define STM32_FLASH_CR_SNB_OFFSET 3 +#define STM32_FLASH_CR_SNB_MASK (15 << STM32_FLASH_CR_SNB_OFFSET)
enum clock { CLOCK_CORE,
Hello Vadzim,
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 21:14:06 +0300, Vadzim Dambrouski pftbest@gmail.com wrote:
flash_lock call is inside a for loop, so after the first iteration flash is locked and no more sectors can be erased. Move flash_lock out of the loop.
Signed-off-by: Vadzim Dambrouski pftbest@gmail.com
The history wrt v1 is missing in both patches.
Can you repost v2 with history?
In case you don't use it already, patman (see tools/patman/README) can ease the workload of managing the history of a patch or patch series.
Amicalement,
participants (2)
-
Albert ARIBAUD -
Vadzim Dambrouski